Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva,scotia,Anonymous,Cornytiv34, for Donating to support the site

Neil Woodford: Views on BP+Shell div sutainability

General discussions about equity high-yield income strategies
DiamondEcho
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3131
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:39 pm
Has thanked: 3060 times
Been thanked: 554 times

Neil Woodford: Views on BP+Shell div sutainability

#41662

Postby DiamondEcho » March 27th, 2017, 2:49 pm

Considering how respected his views are, I thought I'd post this for holders of the subject shares:

'Will BP and Shell be forced to cut their dividends? This is a question that has been keeping income investors, both private and professional, awake at night for some time. Now a new and authoritative voice has joined the debate. Neil Woodford, Britain’s most prominent income investor, has come down firmly on the side of those who think the oil giants’ dividends are unsustainable.
Moderator Message:
edited as more than an extract. Raptor.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/investing/sh ... quidating/

moorfield
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3523
Joined: November 7th, 2016, 1:56 pm
Has thanked: 1546 times
Been thanked: 1402 times

Re: Neil Woodford: Views on BP+Shell div sutainability

#41670

Postby moorfield » March 27th, 2017, 3:32 pm

Well now might be the time to hide a *slight* cut from UK shareholders, whilst £/$ works in Shell's favour ...

77ss
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1271
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:42 am
Has thanked: 233 times
Been thanked: 414 times

Re: Neil Woodford: Views on BP+Shell div sutainability

#41761

Postby 77ss » March 27th, 2017, 10:34 pm

DiamondEcho wrote:Considering how respected his views are, I thought I'd post this for holders of the subject shares:

'Will BP and Shell be forced to cut their dividends? This is a question that has been keeping income investors, both private and professional, awake at night for some time. Now a new and authoritative voice has joined the debate. Neil Woodford, Britain’s most prominent income investor, has come down firmly on the side of those who think the oil giants’ dividends are unsustainable.
Moderator Message:
edited as more than an extraxt. Raptor.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/investing/sh ... quidating/


Not his first comment on 'big oil'.

Neil Woodford: Why I have sold my entire stakes in BP and Shell

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/pers ... Shell.html

From October 2009!

For what it's worth, I recently halved my (overweight) holding in RDSB. Never sell Shell? Well, I'm not so sure. My intention was to rebuy some in next year's ISA, but there are other options.

richfool
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3492
Joined: November 19th, 2016, 2:02 pm
Has thanked: 1194 times
Been thanked: 1280 times

Re: Neil Woodford: Views on BP+Shell div sutainability

#41801

Postby richfool » March 28th, 2017, 9:12 am

Whilst I certainly share some of Woodford's scepticism, I note that Temple Bar, CTY, FCI and SCF still hold Shell in their top ten holdings. Holdings varying between 4% and 7%.

toofast2live
Lemon Slice
Posts: 494
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 2:24 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: Neil Woodford: Views on BP+Shell div sutainability

#41867

Postby toofast2live » March 28th, 2017, 12:28 pm

Woody, love him or loathe him, is a conviction stock picker. As well as avoiding oilies, miners, HSBC and other banks I also think he avoids Vodafone. And I don't think he'd buy Carillion with a twenty foot barge pole. Au contraire he still believes in Capita, for example

Very few managers have the guts to avoid quite a few of the top ten FTSE shares, as it means they may underperform the index.

Omitting these shares and including his rump holdings in innovative pharma means he will under or over perform accordingly. Last year was not good, for example, because he missed the surge in miners, oil and banks.

More worrying still is that the FTSE100 is paying out more in dividends than its earnings.

Lootman
The full Lemon
Posts: 18674
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
Has thanked: 628 times
Been thanked: 6559 times

Re: Neil Woodford: Views on BP+Shell div sutainability

#41911

Postby Lootman » March 28th, 2017, 3:52 pm

toofast2live wrote:More worrying still is that the FTSE100 is paying out more in dividends than its earnings.

Yes, I don't see how this can end well. It's also significant that the P/E ratio on higher yielders is actually higher than on lower yielders, which doesn't auger well for the "usual suspect" HY universe.

The problem in the UK is that we're all overly obsessed with dividends, which means companies do not cut them for fear of offending the shareholder base. At least, not until things get so bad that there is no choice.

In the US, one of the big three oil companies, Conoco Phillips, cut its dividend last year. Chevron looks like it cannot sustain its and only Exxon, which is run more conservatively and has a lower yield anyway, looks safe.

Unless the oil price shoots up and bails them out, I agree with Woodford that BP and Shell are feasting on their own entrails.

YeeWo
Lemon Slice
Posts: 424
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 10:12 am
Has thanked: 297 times
Been thanked: 118 times

Re: Neil Woodford: Views on BP+Shell div sutainability

#41941

Postby YeeWo » March 28th, 2017, 5:29 pm

BP is 6% and RDSB is 8% of my pot. Both businesses are undoubtedly nibbling themselves currently with such high dividends. However neither are static in their re-engineering i.e. BP is still rejigging post Deepwater Horizon, Shell has huge potential operating efficiencies from the integration of BG. Furthermore cable has made the task of dividend payment easier post referendum.

Sblake
Posts: 3
Joined: March 28th, 2017, 8:36 pm

Re: Neil Woodford: Views on BP+Shell div sutainability

#41976

Postby Sblake » March 28th, 2017, 8:44 pm

Nice views from Woodford - something I had no idea on about before.

Bouleversee
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4652
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:01 pm
Has thanked: 1195 times
Been thanked: 902 times

Re: Neil Woodford: Views on BP+Shell div sutainability

#41984

Postby Bouleversee » March 28th, 2017, 9:08 pm

I'm inclined to agree with him. In fact, I won't be buying any of the major FTSE shares in the foreseeable future.

I wonder what his new income fund will be buying, and whether any of you will be buying it.

Dod1010
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1058
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:18 am
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 164 times

Re: Neil Woodford: Views on BP+Shell div sutainability

#42994

Postby Dod1010 » April 2nd, 2017, 7:59 am

I hold Shell and HSBC, both unashamedly for the current yield. HSBC has said in its recent Annual Report that its dividend is sustainable and Shell is taking action to reconstruct its business. I need dividends to live off and so why would I not hold them? If they cut their dividend (either of them) I doubt that they will cancel them and so they will probably still have a decent yield. Neither is a Carillion or worse, a Cobham (famous last words)

Woodford is probably looking a decade on; I am looking at next year and so have no interest in Woodford's new income fund. Still, I do need to find a home for the cash from London & St Lawrence.

Dod

toofast2live
Lemon Slice
Posts: 494
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 2:24 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: Neil Woodford: Views on BP+Shell div sutainability

#43645

Postby toofast2live » April 4th, 2017, 7:43 pm

I'm not sure Woody expects a cut. I think what he is saying is that Shell is selling off businesses to meet dividend demands rather than investing in those businesses for long term growth. Woody would be happier if they cut the dividend and focused on long term growth. i think he has said much the same about GSK.

His focus is Total Return with a big nod toward dividend and dividend growth. Our focus is primarily a high and growing income, with a nod to TR.


Return to “High Yield Shares & Strategies - General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests