Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to gpadsa,Steffers0,lansdown,Wasron,jfgw, for Donating to support the site
pot holes
Forum rules
Direct questions and answers, this room is not for general discussion please
Direct questions and answers, this room is not for general discussion please
-
- 2 Lemon pips
- Posts: 124
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 2:41 pm
- Has thanked: 206 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
pot holes
When I report health and safety issues I find that these matters are usually given urgent attention. DAK why pot holes, which are clearly a safety matter, are not treated with the same respect?
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 7221
- Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
- Has thanked: 1675 times
- Been thanked: 3859 times
Re: pot holes
dubre wrote:When I report health and safety issues I find that these matters are usually given urgent attention. DAK why pot holes, which are clearly a safety matter, are not treated with the same respect?
1) There are many millions of them
2) Not many people die from falling down pot holes (compared to say, mine shafts)
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 18989
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
- Has thanked: 641 times
- Been thanked: 6724 times
Re: pot holes
Potholes are a local authority responsibility. But since repairs to private vehicles as a result of damage from potholes are not paid by the LA, they do not care. And they would rather spend their (our) money on welfare or diversity and equity policies.
I would make LAs financially responsible for any and all damage to vehicles caused by potholes.
I would make LAs financially responsible for any and all damage to vehicles caused by potholes.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2484
- Joined: November 18th, 2021, 11:57 am
- Has thanked: 2003 times
- Been thanked: 1213 times
Re: pot holes
I'm at a loss to understand when and why it became acceptable for our main roads, including motorways to look like they are in a war zone? It must be a pretty recent development as I don’t remember a time in the 50 years I've been legally driving when our main roads were in such an appalling condition.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:12 am
- Has thanked: 3657 times
- Been thanked: 1526 times
Re: pot holes
Lootman wrote:Potholes are a local authority responsibility. But since repairs to private vehicles as a result of damage from potholes are not paid by the LA, they do not care. And they would rather spend their (our) money on welfare or diversity and equity policies.
I would make LAs financially responsible for any and all damage to vehicles caused by potholes.
I'm sure I've read about people successfully claiming against LAs because their vehicles have been damaged by potholes. That would only be for obvious damage that occurred by driving over a pothole, but even if potholes don't cause immediate and obvious damage, they must contribute significantly to the wear and tear on tyres, suspension etc. So it seems that all road users pay one way or another.
RC
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4442
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:14 pm
- Has thanked: 1615 times
- Been thanked: 1607 times
Re: pot holes
BullDog wrote:I'm at a loss to understand when and why it became acceptable for our main roads, including motorways to look like they are in a war zone? It must be a pretty recent development[...]
Probably happened around Jun 2010. Don't think I need explain why.
GS
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:12 am
- Has thanked: 3657 times
- Been thanked: 1526 times
Re: pot holes
GoSeigen wrote:BullDog wrote:I'm at a loss to understand when and why it became acceptable for our main roads, including motorways to look like they are in a war zone? It must be a pretty recent development[...]
Probably happened around Jun 2010. Don't think I need explain why.
GS
I seem to remember that the roads got pretty bad in the late 70's although probably not as bad as now.
RC
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 18989
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
- Has thanked: 641 times
- Been thanked: 6724 times
Re: pot holes
GoSeigen wrote:BullDog wrote:I'm at a loss to understand when and why it became acceptable for our main roads, including motorways to look like they are in a war zone? It must be a pretty recent development[...]
Probably happened around Jun 2010. Don't think I need explain why.
Your kneejerk anti-Tory comment made me notice that we have not heard from that other relentless Tory-hater BobbyG since April.
I do hope he is doing OK.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 7910
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 3053 times
Re: pot holes
Lootman wrote:Your kneejerk anti-Tory comment made me notice that we have not heard from that other relentless Tory-hater BobbyG since April.
I do hope he is doing OK.
Would that be the great grandson of BobbyD? The latter was last active two days ago....
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 18989
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
- Has thanked: 641 times
- Been thanked: 6724 times
Re: pot holes
mc2fool wrote:Lootman wrote:Your kneejerk anti-Tory comment made me notice that we have not heard from that other relentless Tory-hater BobbyG since April.
I do hope he is doing OK.
The latter was last active two days ago....
His last post was April 29th, was what I meant by "have not heard from him".
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5316
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
- Has thanked: 3299 times
- Been thanked: 1034 times
Re: pot holes
Im sure its many and varied reasons... but certainly part of that is the lack of funds to do so and a lack or resources to actually do the work.
Quite why there are insufficient funds is one question, but ultimately most revenue nationally ends up in the hands of the government and not LAs, whoi are stymied by what govt actually gives them and by laws limiting what they can raise themselves. As for a lack of actual resources to carry out the work (IF the funds were there in the first place etc) Im sure we can all look to one area that has diminished the UK labour force - which if not directly involved in road maintenance has led to a vacuum elsewhere where potential RM crews now work instead.
Its a mess.
Quite why there are insufficient funds is one question, but ultimately most revenue nationally ends up in the hands of the government and not LAs, whoi are stymied by what govt actually gives them and by laws limiting what they can raise themselves. As for a lack of actual resources to carry out the work (IF the funds were there in the first place etc) Im sure we can all look to one area that has diminished the UK labour force - which if not directly involved in road maintenance has led to a vacuum elsewhere where potential RM crews now work instead.
Its a mess.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3502
- Joined: November 5th, 2016, 8:43 am
- Has thanked: 3888 times
- Been thanked: 1424 times
Re: pot holes
didds wrote:Im sure its many and varied reasons... but certainly part of that is the lack of funds to do so and a lack or resources to actually do the work.
Quite why there are insufficient funds is one question, but ultimately most revenue nationally ends up in the hands of the government and not LAs, whoi are stymied by what govt actually gives them and by laws limiting what they can raise themselves. As for a lack of actual resources to carry out the work (IF the funds were there in the first place etc) Im sure we can all look to one area that has diminished the UK labour force - which if not directly involved in road maintenance has led to a vacuum elsewhere where potential RM crews now work instead.
Its a mess.
And the LA gets quite embarrassed when locals solve the problem themselves!
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/thank-mystery ... 29242.html
Steve
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 4442
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:14 pm
- Has thanked: 1615 times
- Been thanked: 1607 times
Re: pot holes
Lootman wrote:Your kneejerk anti-Tory comment
It was not knee-jerk, I assure you, it is a view I have long and carefully considered.
GS
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 18989
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
- Has thanked: 641 times
- Been thanked: 6724 times
Re: pot holes
GoSeigen wrote:Lootman wrote:Your kneejerk anti-Tory comment
It was not knee-jerk, I assure you, it is a view I have long and carefully considered.
No doubt you have, although just because an opinion has been long and carefully considered does not mean that it is valid. I have a long and carefully considered opinion that is the exact opposite!
But my point was more about why Bobby has suddenly stopped his near daily rants about the Tories. Perhaps he is reconsidering his carefully considered biases?
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8977
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
- Has thanked: 1330 times
- Been thanked: 3711 times
Re: pot holes
Lootman wrote:Potholes are a local authority responsibility. But since repairs to private vehicles as a result of damage from potholes are not paid by the LA, they do not care. And they would rather spend their (our) money on welfare or diversity and equity policies.
I would make LAs financially responsible for any and all damage to vehicles caused by potholes.
They are financially liable already.
I successfully claimed several thousands from them a few years ago for damage to my car. They did try every trick in the book to avoid paying but paid up in full 24 hours before the small claims court case was due after asking me if I would give them an extra two weeks to consider the case (after several months already elapsed). My response to their request was a one word email (rather than the 2 word response I wanted to give).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests