servodude wrote:No argument that it could have been done better, and that it's the way it's been done that's made it unsustainable
Sounds like it's closer to water/trains in my opinion than yours though
there isn't a real competition of networks for the end customer (there's one cable to the house)
- there's an opaque market of firms to charge you usage on infrastructure they lease, share, or sometimes own for power that's traded in really volatile spot pricing
Middle men afford opportunity for middle men but rarely increase efficiency overall and I see them as a risk in something as critical
But yeah most of the immediate problem has been the wrong type of regulation
-sd
The problem is that the customer is divorced from the cost of the product they are consuming, believes they have a right to attain it at a 'fair' price regardless of that cost, and is insulated from the more serious consequences of picking an unsustainable supplier, while suppliers are forced to compete in a broken market which perpetuates illogical behaviour while no attention is paid to their ability to deliver a highly volatile product at a set price for the next 2 years without going bankrupt, and then the government decide to instigate a price cap...