Arborbridge wrote:kempiejon wrote:That's a bit better then, it's fallen back a few percent, perhaps this trend will continue and it'll be a high yielder by Christmas. I don't believe any of the vaccine hype it's all a long way away. You might have called the peak, shame not to have acted on it. Next week the sp could be anywhere.
You might have called the peak, shame not to have acted on it. Quite possibly! I went on a walk to finish the South Downs Way, having now walked all the way from Eastbourne to Winchester - ending there yesterday for lunch in a pub. Consequently, all other thoughts were put on the back burner.
This morning, I notice AZN has dipped below x2 median (x1.93) so whether it was "persistently" above x2 is isn't now - though the thought still remains about whether I should act or not.
The most important word in "You might have called the peak" is "might" - whenever you see that word, consider the alternative "might not" as well!
Looking at a share price chart such as
https://www.investegate.co.uk/CompData.aspx?AZN and setting the period to 3 years to get a bigger sample, I reckon I can count at least 5 and probably 7 similar 'peaks' in those 3 years, in the sense that they were new all-time-high (*) share prices followed by a similar-sized percentage drop to the one that has happened here. So any sort of attempt to spot such 'peaks' and sell on them is liable to be selling every 6 months or less on average - not at all consistent with an LTB&H strategy!
I'm not accusing anyone here of not running a HYP strategy - just pointing out that regretting such 'missed opportunities' is a step on the broad path that leads one away from running a HYP. Only a step and it will take quite a few more to get away from running a HYP - but why take that step? Save yourself a lot of agonising by having a tinkering policy
and sticking to it. If your tinkering policy says to sell a proportion of your holding if and when a share goes over twice median weight in your HYP, do such a sale when it goes over twice median weight; if it doesn't say that, don't. Either way, don't waste your time on useless regrets afterwards -
any tinkering policy (including the policy of not tinkering at all) will have occasions when it fails, either by telling you to sell all or part of a holding that then continues to rise, or by telling you not to do so for a holding that then collapses.
By the way, I'm not arguing against
reviewing one's tinkering policy. The difference is that a tinkering policy review looks at many cases where one tinkered or would have tinkered under an alternative policy being considered, and is preferably done when one doesn't have any recent case of tinkering / not tinkering that could dominate one's thinking, whereas regretting a decision to tinker or not to tinker considers one (typically recent) case that is dominating one's thinking.
(*) All-time-highness checked against a much longer-period chart.
Gengulphus