Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva,scotia,Anonymous,Cornytiv34, for Donating to support the site
Who is responsible if an incorrect material is used in construction?
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3852
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:04 pm
- Has thanked: 681 times
- Been thanked: 1489 times
Who is responsible if an incorrect material is used in construction?
We have a situation where stainless steel balconies were installed in some sea front properties. Because of the location, marine (A4) grade stainless steel was specified. However, lower quality (A2) steel was supplied and installed and is now suffering from corrosion. There is no way the installers could reasonably have known the wrong material was supplied as when new the steel looks identical and is not marked with A4/A2 quality indicators.
I would assume that the only legal action we could take would be against the installers and it is up to the installers to take action against the suppliers. Is this correct?
There is a risk that the building company puts itself out of business. In that case, would we have any recourse against the suppliers?
Any suggestions for the best way to resolve this mess?
I would assume that the only legal action we could take would be against the installers and it is up to the installers to take action against the suppliers. Is this correct?
There is a risk that the building company puts itself out of business. In that case, would we have any recourse against the suppliers?
Any suggestions for the best way to resolve this mess?
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
- Has thanked: 441 times
- Been thanked: 2324 times
Re: Who is responsible if an incorrect material is used in construction?
Who ordered it, was it the installer, quoting the spec of the customer? Or did the customer order directly, and the installer simply install? Or perhaps more simply who had a contract with whom and to do what? Who didn't fulfil the contract?
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3852
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:04 pm
- Has thanked: 681 times
- Been thanked: 1489 times
Re: Who is responsible if an incorrect material is used in construction?
dealtn wrote:Who ordered it, was it the installer, quoting the spec of the customer? Or did the customer order directly, and the installer simply install? Or perhaps more simply who had a contract with whom and to do what? Who didn't fulfil the contract?
We had a contract with the building company, which specified marine grade SS to be used. The building company had a contract with the supplier, specifying marine grade SS. The supplier supplied the wrong material and we have a letter from them admitting they did this.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 2:20 am
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 196 times
Re: Who is responsible if an incorrect material is used in construction?
hiriskpaul wrote:dealtn wrote:Who ordered it, was it the installer, quoting the spec of the customer? Or did the customer order directly, and the installer simply install? Or perhaps more simply who had a contract with whom and to do what? Who didn't fulfil the contract?
We had a contract with the building company, which specified marine grade SS to be used. The building company had a contract with the supplier, specifying marine grade SS. The supplier supplied the wrong material and we have a letter from them admitting they did this.
You action the building company and they or their insurers will recover the rectification costs from the supplier.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3852
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:04 pm
- Has thanked: 681 times
- Been thanked: 1489 times
Re: Who is responsible if an incorrect material is used in construction?
supremetwo wrote:hiriskpaul wrote:dealtn wrote:Who ordered it, was it the installer, quoting the spec of the customer? Or did the customer order directly, and the installer simply install? Or perhaps more simply who had a contract with whom and to do what? Who didn't fulfil the contract?
We had a contract with the building company, which specified marine grade SS to be used. The building company had a contract with the supplier, specifying marine grade SS. The supplier supplied the wrong material and we have a letter from them admitting they did this.
You action the building company and they or their insurers will recover the rectification costs from the supplier.
I thought that was the case thanks, but what happens if the building company winds itself up? Is there any legal action we could take against the supplier?
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 2:20 am
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 196 times
Re: Who is responsible if an incorrect material is used in construction?
hiriskpaul wrote:supremetwo wrote:hiriskpaul wrote:We had a contract with the building company, which specified marine grade SS to be used. The building company had a contract with the supplier, specifying marine grade SS. The supplier supplied the wrong material and we have a letter from them admitting they did this.
You action the building company and they or their insurers will recover the rectification costs from the supplier.
I thought that was the case thanks, but what happens if the building company winds itself up? Is there any legal action we could take against the supplier?
Insurers are still liable if a company that has taken out insurance for the period in question subsequently liquidates.
https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/g ... t-insurers
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3852
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:04 pm
- Has thanked: 681 times
- Been thanked: 1489 times
Re: Who is responsible if an incorrect material is used in construction?
supremetwo wrote:hiriskpaul wrote:supremetwo wrote:You action the building company and they or their insurers will recover the rectification costs from the supplier.
I thought that was the case thanks, but what happens if the building company winds itself up? Is there any legal action we could take against the supplier?
Insurers are still liable if a company that has taken out insurance for the period in question subsequently liquidates.
https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/g ... t-insurers
Interesting. Is this likely to be something an insurer would pay out on?
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5243
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
- Has thanked: 3241 times
- Been thanked: 1018 times
Re: Who is responsible if an incorrect material is used in construction?
supremetwo wrote:Insurers are still liable if a company that has taken out insurance for the period in question subsequently liquidates.
https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/g ... t-insurers
the problem of course being identifyoing who the insurers were at the time. especially if the builder etc has themselves disapopeared or died etc and the knowledge is lost from the most obvious source. that doesnt make S2's advice incorrect of course.
didds
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 2:20 am
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 196 times
Re: Who is responsible if an incorrect material is used in construction?
didds wrote:supremetwo wrote:Insurers are still liable if a company that has taken out insurance for the period in question subsequently liquidates.
https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/g ... t-insurers
the problem of course being identifyoing who the insurers were at the time. especially if the builder etc has themselves disapopeared or died etc and the knowledge is lost from the most obvious source. that doesnt make S2's advice incorrect of course.
didds
The obvious advice is to require a copy of a contractors insurance and check that it is in place before placing the contract.
-
- 2 Lemon pips
- Posts: 154
- Joined: November 5th, 2016, 2:18 am
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Re: Who is responsible if an incorrect material is used in construction?
supremetwo wrote:The obvious advice is to require a copy of a contractors insurance and check that it is in place before placing the contract...
...that sounds like shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted (in this particular case!)
newlyretired
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 7383
- Joined: February 7th, 2017, 9:36 pm
- Has thanked: 10514 times
- Been thanked: 4659 times
Re: Who is responsible if an incorrect material is used in construction?
hiriskpaul wrote:We have a situation where stainless steel balconies were installed in some sea front properties. Because of the location, marine (A4) grade stainless steel was specified. However, lower quality (A2) steel was supplied and installed and is now suffering from corrosion. There is no way the installers could reasonably have known the wrong material was supplied as when new the steel looks identical and is not marked with A4/A2 quality indicators.
I would assume that the only legal action we could take would be against the installers and it is up to the installers to take action against the suppliers. Is this correct?
There is a risk that the building company puts itself out of business. In that case, would we have any recourse against the suppliers?
Any suggestions for the best way to resolve this mess?
I think this would be classed as a "latent defect". Do you have any written warranties relating to the materials used? If not do some reading on "latent defects"
AiYn'U
Return to “Legal Issues (Practical)”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests