didds wrote:dealtn wrote:
Just because it hasn't been mentioned doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
so its total supposition? It could be 80K. It could be 80p.
Oh...
Why is it total supposition?
What assets do you know where altering the financial cashflows don't have an affect on valuation?
I see you declined to answer which of the 2 investments I described earlier in the thread you would prefer.
Are you suggesting 2 properties in identical locations would be valued the same if one had a service charge of £100 pa and one had a service charge of £5,000 pa? That's not how property valuations and actual property transactions work.
So, without knowing the details of what the property is worth, or what the restriction actually is, it is difficult to know. I would expect it extremely likely its neither £80k or 80p though. Equally unlikely is your reputed "nothing".
This is a "practical" board, and someone asked how to remove a clause, and whether there was any benefit. All I am doing is pointing out there are potential benefits, perhaps to others, and perhaps to the property owner too. Denying that isn't practical or helpful to the OP in understanding how they can be removed, and at what cost.