AleisterCrowley wrote:re SWRswill453 wrote:Standing Wave Ratio, innit?
Scott.
Yep, that's what it probably means to me, after some reflection.
A bit old-school though. Return Loss is much nicer
--kiloran
Thanks to eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva, for Donating to support the site
AleisterCrowley wrote:re SWRswill453 wrote:Standing Wave Ratio, innit?
Scott.
Yep, that's what it probably means to me, after some reflection.
kiloran wrote:A bit old-school though. Return Loss is much nicer
PinkDalek wrote:kiloran wrote:A bit old-school though. Return Loss is much nicer
Is that the same as Total Return (but negative)?
PD - Not really understanding why this topic is in the Biscuit Bar.
Return to “Room 102 - Site Issues, Complaints & General Chat”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests