Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva, for Donating to support the site

Is HYS&S only about dividends?

Formerly "Lemon Fool - Improve the Recipe" repurposed as Room 102 (see above).
Alaric
Lemon Half
Posts: 6059
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 9:05 am
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 1413 times

Re: Is HYS&S only about dividends?

#328169

Postby Alaric » July 23rd, 2020, 1:08 pm

CryptoPlankton wrote:The revised guidelines certainly seem to have clarified that "capital gain harvesting" is indeed OT.


I would be inclined to think that investing in shares with lower than average dividend yields but long histories of dividend increases well above inflation was a dividend yield based strategy. If you wanted to draw down some of the return above the dividend for immediate income instead of it remaining invested, a bit of top slice selling would be needed. The usual examples of such shares are Unilever and Diageo.

CryptoPlankton
Lemon Slice
Posts: 789
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:12 pm
Has thanked: 1553 times
Been thanked: 876 times

Re: Is HYS&S only about dividends?

#328220

Postby CryptoPlankton » July 23rd, 2020, 3:16 pm

Alaric wrote:
CryptoPlankton wrote:The revised guidelines certainly seem to have clarified that "capital gain harvesting" is indeed OT.


I would be inclined to think that investing in shares with lower than average dividend yields but long histories of dividend increases well above inflation was a dividend yield based strategy.

I'd be inclined to agree with you, but I'd also be inclined to think that, by definition, "investing in shares with lower than average dividend yields" isn't a high yield strategy.

Alaric wrote: If you wanted to draw down some of the return above the dividend for immediate income instead of it remaining invested, a bit of top slice selling would be needed. The usual examples of such shares are Unilever and Diageo.


A very reasonable (but not high yield) strategy, perhaps better suited to the "Investment Strategie"s board?

Alaric
Lemon Half
Posts: 6059
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 9:05 am
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 1413 times

Re: Is HYS&S only about dividends?

#328251

Postby Alaric » July 23rd, 2020, 5:43 pm

CryptoPlankton wrote:I'd be inclined to agree with you, but I'd also be inclined to think that, by definition, "investing in shares with lower than average dividend yields" isn't a high yield strategy.


What's the reference point for "high"? I could suggest anything above cash or Gilts.

I could also suggest using the sum of current yield and dividend growth rate as a measuring rod.

CryptoPlankton
Lemon Slice
Posts: 789
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:12 pm
Has thanked: 1553 times
Been thanked: 876 times

Re: Is HYS&S only about dividends?

#328274

Postby CryptoPlankton » July 23rd, 2020, 7:14 pm

Alaric wrote:
CryptoPlankton wrote:I'd be inclined to agree with you, but I'd also be inclined to think that, by definition, "investing in shares with lower than average dividend yields" isn't a high yield strategy.


What's the reference point for "high"? I could suggest anything above cash or Gilts.

I could also suggest using the sum of current yield and dividend growth rate as a measuring rod.

I suspect not, but if this is truly troubling you and you are still genuinely struggling to interpret the guidelines after the recent clarification then I can only suggest you ask for further clarification from the site admin. I'm sure that if you pester long and hard enough you will finally get a watertight set of guidelines leaving you in no doubt. Fortunately for me, they are (and always have been) quite clear enough.

(Incidentally, I would be very interested in your strategy involving lower yielding shares with high dividend growth rates like Diageo and Unilever. - perhaps you could post more details on Investment Strategies for us all to discuss?)

Gengulphus
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4255
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:17 am
Been thanked: 2628 times

Re: Is HYS&S only about dividends?

#328275

Postby Gengulphus » July 23rd, 2020, 7:31 pm

Wizard wrote:
Clariman wrote:
Moderator Message:
The Moderation team have discussed the HYS&S board purpose and guidelines, and have unanimously agreed some small changes. Thanks for your patience. Clariman


Details here viewtopic.php?f=31&t=8652&p=98965

Thank you for the link to the updated guidelines. Sorry if I am being dumb, but can you clarify what you mean by "natural yield"? Is there more to that than the dividend or is "natural yield" the same as dividend yield?

Occasionally, a company returns capital by a "B share scheme", in which B shares are split off from the ordinary shares, and then the B shares are compulsorily redeemed. The redemption payment is technically a capital distribution rather than a dividend, and the shareholder doesn't need to take any active steps to receive it, so I would think it contributes to "natural yield" but not technically to "dividend yield". It is effectively equivalent for the investor to a dividend for all purposes other than tax (*) - usually a special dividend because it's one-off (**). For the company, there are other differences to do with company law and company taxation.

Carrying that principle to the extreme, cash takeover proceeds would also seem to be part of the "natural yield". They in particular, but also big "B share schemes" and big special dividends, can make the "natural yield" much higher than planned for... I assume that HYS&S guidance saying "use the natural yield arising from higher-yielding equities to generate an income" does not preclude reinvesting the surplus if the generated income turns out to be more than is needed! Rather, it precludes strategies that seek out shares with high natural yields with no particular intention to actually receive those yields. (E.g. a Value strategy ideally wants a good capital gain to be realised as soon as possible - so holding on to the shares long enough to receive dividends from them is a welcome bonus, but not what it's really aiming for.)

Incidentally, the phrase "total return strategy" that still appears in the guidance is still undefined, and nonsense as far as I am concerned: a "total return" is something that every strategy has, not a type of strategy. Rather than trying to come up with a definition, I think the second paragraph of the guidance would be better without it, e.g. "It is recognized that a higher yield can be a proxy for value characteristics, and that selecting higher-yielding equities on that basis can contribute capital gains to the returns of a strategy. It is emphasised that value strategies and other strategies that use high yields in that way are NOT the remit of this board, which is intended for discussions of higher-yielding equities for the purposes of generating an income through such equities' natural yield."

(*) Note that there used to be "B share schemes" and "B/C share schemes" that were more complicated and did involve an active step from the shareholder, in that they gave the shareholder a choice of tax treatments, between treating the returned cash as a dividend or as a capital distribution. Those schemes have fallen into disuse since a change in tax law was enacted some years ago to scupper them: the change says that if a shareholder is given a choice between receiving a payment as a dividend or a capital distribution, it is to be treated as a dividend for tax purposes regardless of the investor's choice. But it doesn't affect cases where the shareholder is given no such choice, such as the "B share schemes" that are still occasionally used.

(**) There are companies like Rolls-Royce that issue fixed-value redeemable shares as a substitute for ordinary dividends, i.e. ones that are normally (though not currently!) expected to be repeated each year. In Rolls-Royce's case, redeeming them is optional for the shareholder, not compulsorily done by the company, and so they're a particularly tricky case for being technically part of the "natural yield" of the company. I suspect though that such pedantry would be met with a "don't rules-lawyer, they closely mimic dividends and so are part of the natural yield for HYS&S purposes" type of response!

Gengulphus


Return to “Room 102 - Site Issues, Complaints & General Chat”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests