In England and Wales some double-barrelled surnames are much more common than their inverses, for example: Lloyd-Wright appears much more common than Wright-Lloyd (whether hyphenated or not). Further, it appears to be more common that the first of these names is single-syllabic whereas the second is more frequently multi-syllabic, and for the first (at least) being surprisingly often of Welsh origin (Lloyd in the above example was originally Llwyd). The obvious explanations such as the wife’s surname becoming attached as the first of the names, or one name being more intrinsically common than the other, or one name being ‘posher’ than the other seem not to apply.
Staying with the example of Lloyd, I can think of numerous double-barrels: some illustrious such as Lloyd-Mostyn (both Welsh) and Lloyd-Baker* (second is a trade name); some well-known such as Lloyd Wright; and some just ‘ordinary’ such as Lloyd-Hughes (both Welsh) and Lloyd-Jones (both Welsh). But Mostyn-Lloyd, Baker-Lloyd etc are very unusual.
+ often not hyphenated: for example the Lloyd-Baker family of Hardwicke Court (and formerly of Stouts Hill) in Gloucestershire were originally Lloyd Baker
Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva,scotia,Anonymous,Cornytiv34, for Donating to support the site
Names more common than their inverses
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8271
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
- Has thanked: 4434 times
- Been thanked: 3564 times
Re: Names more common than their inverses
I think it might be down to how English works.
Some stuff just sounds wrong.
This book: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Eloquence
- covers a lot of what you don't realise you know in a way that is very readable
Like it's never: tock tick, or flop flip!
- sd
Some stuff just sounds wrong.
This book: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Eloquence
- covers a lot of what you don't realise you know in a way that is very readable
Like it's never: tock tick, or flop flip!
- sd
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6381
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
- Has thanked: 1880 times
- Been thanked: 2026 times
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8271
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
- Has thanked: 4434 times
- Been thanked: 3564 times
Re: Names more common than their inverses
AleisterCrowley wrote:Or zag zig....
Euphony is the word..!
Yes it is! Kudos and rec for that
-sd
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3561
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:43 pm
- Has thanked: 2371 times
- Been thanked: 1943 times
Re: Names more common than their inverses
Slightly off topic - but it does cover the inclusion of a wife's name. I remember a lad who's surname was McGrotty. So rather than his wife-to-be becoming Mrs McGrotty, he took her surname, and dropped the McGrotty entirely (no hyphenated inclusion). A sensible fellow.
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:25 pm
- Has thanked: 101 times
- Been thanked: 374 times
Re: Names more common than their inverses
We have family friends whose children's surnames are Beartree-Butchers* and some others whose children's surnames are Macdonald-Grey. In each case the parents surnames have been joined and hyphenated
I dearly wish the two families to intermarry. The excitement of filing in forms when your surname is Beartree-Butchers-Macdonald-Grey.
DM
*In neither case are these the real names, although the number of characters in each name is accurate
I dearly wish the two families to intermarry. The excitement of filing in forms when your surname is Beartree-Butchers-Macdonald-Grey.
DM
*In neither case are these the real names, although the number of characters in each name is accurate
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: November 7th, 2016, 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 83 times
- Been thanked: 781 times
Re: Names more common than their inverses
servodude wrote:This book: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Eloquence covers a lot of what you don't realise you know in a way that is very readable
I bought a copy after a review in the Telegraph!
It doesn't explain the surname paradox but gives interesting insight [note the alliteration...] into the techniques of some writers.
The past master of this was Edgar Allan Poe; his poetry may not be Keats but his command of rhyme, rhythm and alliteration is extraordinary - predating Gerard Manley Hopkins and Dylan Thomas. Just read The Raven or The Bells out loud. Some of his verse forms go way back to the ancient Welsh cynghanedd and to the equally ancient English alliterative masterpieces such Langland's Piers Plowman.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests