Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva, for Donating to support the site

Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

The home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
Forum rules
This is the home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
Bouleversee
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4654
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:01 pm
Has thanked: 1195 times
Been thanked: 903 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326436

Postby Bouleversee » July 15th, 2020, 9:15 pm

Of course they don't care about me as an individual but if they want to avoid a 2nd wave, the best chance is to make everyone wear a mask. Their main concern is the economy and that will not recover unless people have the confidence to go shopping and resume activities without fear of infection. That is my opinion and it is as valid as yours. I have nothing else to say on the subject and will not be reading any more posts in this context.

servodude
Lemon Half
Posts: 8374
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
Has thanked: 4471 times
Been thanked: 3601 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326454

Postby servodude » July 15th, 2020, 11:12 pm

I found this an interesting read on masks
https://theconversation.com/amp/mask-re ... ers-141687

-sd

Nimrod103
Lemon Half
Posts: 6606
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:10 pm
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2317 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326482

Postby Nimrod103 » July 16th, 2020, 7:49 am

GoSeigen wrote:
tjh290633 wrote:I see that there is a spike in cases in Crawley. That includes Gatwick, so is there any connection? If arrivals are being tested, that could explain the spike. However Crawley also has an above average level of Asian families, many of whom work in the airport. There could be a connection. There seems to be a number in health related occupations, and the young woman who often does my eye inspections comes from Crawley, having a sub-continent heritage. On the other hand, my dentist in Crawley is Persian and the hygienist is of Indian descent.


It's white people spreading this disease, didn't you know? Look at all the early people who had it. Whites who feel it their right to travel the world spreading their germs, pack themselves into ski resort bars, or consort with underage Thais, then bring home the stuff they've caught.

GS
P.S. Don't be offended, just stating scientific facts.


I don’t believe Thailand was a significant source, nor in fact a source at all of infection. Do you have a thing about underage Thais? Most UK infections came from Spain and Italy according to genetic studies. Via any colour of person.
However, we are now at the stage of trying to understand and eradicate more localised outbreaks, and reports in the BBC and DM about Leicester, Blackburn and other such towns show that most misbehaving vectors are in the ‘South Asian’ ethnic group.

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6091
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 442 times
Been thanked: 2338 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326511

Postby dealtn » July 16th, 2020, 9:36 am

Bouleversee wrote:Of course they don't care about me as an individual but if they want to avoid a 2nd wave, the best chance is to make everyone wear a mask. Their main concern is the economy and that will not recover unless people have the confidence to go shopping and resume activities without fear of infection. That is my opinion and it is as valid as yours. I have nothing else to say on the subject and will not be reading any more posts in this context.


I'm not a big shopper, but I am less likely to be shopping if I have to wear a mask (and the same with other "activities"), so it works both ways as far as economic confidence is concerned.

redsturgeon
Lemon Half
Posts: 8948
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 3688 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326553

Postby redsturgeon » July 16th, 2020, 11:03 am

Moderator Message:
Please keep the discussion here away from Polite Discussion territory.

ursaminortaur
Lemon Half
Posts: 7040
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:26 pm
Has thanked: 456 times
Been thanked: 1748 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326572

Postby ursaminortaur » July 16th, 2020, 11:46 am

Itsallaguess wrote:
MrFoolish wrote:
My question is why Matt Hancock thinks they are effective in shops but not in schools and workplaces?


It's difficult to judge without him explicitly explaining himself, but I suspect there's an element of 'bubbles' to the different approaches.

In workplaces and in schools, there is going to naturally be an element of repetitive 'bubbles', which in and of themselves will limit the extent of any potential cross-infection at the borders of those bubbles.


Only if you consider the whole organisation to be a bubble or restrict everybody to virtual meetings. Staff and managers will generally be having multiple meetings each week with people from other departments and some managers may well be using the old strategy of Management by Walking Around. Hence it would be relatively easy for an infection to pass from one department to another.
https://medium.com/leading-and-managing/management-by-walking-around-motivating-and-developing-staff-9bac6258f544

Itsallaguess
Lemon Half
Posts: 9129
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:16 pm
Has thanked: 4140 times
Been thanked: 10025 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326574

Postby Itsallaguess » July 16th, 2020, 11:54 am

ursaminortaur wrote:
Itsallaguess wrote:
MrFoolish wrote:
My question is why Matt Hancock thinks they are effective in shops but not in schools and workplaces?


It's difficult to judge without him explicitly explaining himself, but I suspect there's an element of 'bubbles' to the different approaches.

In workplaces and in schools, there is going to naturally be an element of repetitive 'bubbles', which in and of themselves will limit the extent of any potential cross-infection at the borders of those bubbles.


Only if you consider the whole organisation to be a bubble or restrict everybody to virtual meetings.

Staff and managers will generally be having multiple meetings each week with people from other departments and some managers may well be using the old strategy of Management by Walking Around.

Hence it would be relatively easy for an infection to pass from one department to another.


Well, it depends on how able or serious each setting is able to be regarding this issue...

I know of one large organisation that has split their large site into sub-zones and are very stringently managing inter-zone risk..

Cheers,

Itsallaguess

Itsallaguess
Lemon Half
Posts: 9129
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:16 pm
Has thanked: 4140 times
Been thanked: 10025 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326737

Postby Itsallaguess » July 17th, 2020, 7:01 am

Mike4 wrote:
I am trying to find a source of data that shows infection rates by area, so I can browse the town or city a potential customer is from before travelling to them.

This info seem to be withheld by the government now, unless someone knows otherwise!


Cross-post to a Health board post, giving a link to the new UK Covid-cases 'Postcode map' -

https://www.lemonfool.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=86&t=22298&p=326736#p326736

Cheers,

Itsallaguess

swill453
Lemon Half
Posts: 7982
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 987 times
Been thanked: 3656 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326745

Postby swill453 » July 17th, 2020, 7:41 am

Itsallaguess wrote:Cross-post to a Health board post, giving a link to the new UK Covid-cases 'Postcode map' -

https://www.lemonfool.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=86&t=22298&p=326736#p326736

Unless I've missed an option or something, it appears to not be the UK, but only England.

Scott.

Itsallaguess
Lemon Half
Posts: 9129
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:16 pm
Has thanked: 4140 times
Been thanked: 10025 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326752

Postby Itsallaguess » July 17th, 2020, 8:19 am

swill453 wrote:
Itsallaguess wrote:
Cross-post to a Health board post, giving a link to the new UK Covid-cases 'Postcode map' -

https://www.lemonfool.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=86&t=22298&p=326736#p326736


Unless I've missed an option or something, it appears to not be the UK, but only England.


Thanks - I think you're right.

Hopefully still a useful resource for those interested in this level of detail.

Cheers,

Itsallaguess

Leothebear
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1460
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:18 pm
Has thanked: 219 times
Been thanked: 830 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326759

Postby Leothebear » July 17th, 2020, 8:41 am

Has there been any progress determining whether surviving the virus gives the survivor immunity?

swill453
Lemon Half
Posts: 7982
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 987 times
Been thanked: 3656 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326760

Postby swill453 » July 17th, 2020, 8:45 am

Itsallaguess wrote:Hopefully still a useful resource for those interested in this level of detail.

Thinking about it, having Scotland entirely blank in the map isn't too far from the truth anyway :-)

Scott.

Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7181
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1658 times
Been thanked: 3817 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326795

Postby Mike4 » July 17th, 2020, 10:22 am

Itsallaguess wrote:
Mike4 wrote:
I am trying to find a source of data that shows infection rates by area, so I can browse the town or city a potential customer is from before travelling to them.

This info seem to be withheld by the government now, unless someone knows otherwise!


Cross-post to a Health board post, giving a link to the new UK Covid-cases 'Postcode map' -

https://www.lemonfool.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=86&t=22298&p=326736#p326736

Cheers,

Itsallaguess

Thanks, just what I was looking for, almost.

"Almost', because it appears to be a map for one specific time period, using data from about a week ago. So already slightly out of date - maybe they will update it every week or so...

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6091
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 442 times
Been thanked: 2338 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326796

Postby dealtn » July 17th, 2020, 10:24 am

Leothebear wrote:Has there been any progress determining whether surviving the virus gives the survivor immunity?


Not that I've seen. Although I think there have been 14 million or so known cases across the world, and as far as I know they haven't found anyone who has "got it" twice yet. I think it's one of those things that is difficult to prove scientifically, but anecdotally it appears to be the case, although it isn't known how long such an immunity lasts.

UncleEbenezer
The full Lemon
Posts: 10784
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:17 pm
Has thanked: 1470 times
Been thanked: 2993 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326813

Postby UncleEbenezer » July 17th, 2020, 11:42 am

Anecdotal data point re: how face masks are likely to spread this and other lurgies.

I did supermarket shopping this morning. As I went to return my trolley, I saw discarded face masks in the empty trollies there. So any germs a wearer might have had - now highly concentrated - are infecting a line of trollies, and by extension the supermarket, and perhaps even the food.

Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7181
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1658 times
Been thanked: 3817 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326818

Postby Mike4 » July 17th, 2020, 11:59 am

dealtn wrote:
Leothebear wrote:Has there been any progress determining whether surviving the virus gives the survivor immunity?


Not that I've seen. Although I think there have been 14 million or so known cases across the world, and as far as I know they haven't found anyone who has "got it" twice yet. I think it's one of those things that is difficult to prove scientifically, but anecdotally it appears to be the case, although it isn't known how long such an immunity lasts.


There are 'lots' of anecdotal cases of people getting it twice according to Dr Martenson. He did an in depth video recently examining the possibility and includes an interview with the doctor husband of one proven case. The doctor's wife caught it, recovered including negative PCR tests, then caught it again three months later IIRC. Will see if I can find it.

Here it is. He's rather 'hyper' in delivery but his content seems thorough.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhyEBIpaIaM

P.S. skip forward and start watching at 2.00 minutes where discussion of this subject begins.

SalvorHardin
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2062
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:32 am
Has thanked: 5361 times
Been thanked: 2485 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326821

Postby SalvorHardin » July 17th, 2020, 12:07 pm

Increasingly it looks like the authorities have decided to base their advice on this video from the American singer and comedienne Adley Stump, which she made last April (it's a spoof press announcement about the rules for dealing with the coronavirus).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVs5AyjzwRM

I used to think that the "Man eaten by shark dies of coronavirus" meme was a joke. It turns out that Public Health England (PHE) treat this as a rule, because they've been recording any death of a person who has tested positive for coronavirus as a coronavirus death. PHE has thus decided that it is impossible to recover from the coronavirus, even if you have recovered. A truly spectacular error, one that the country will be paying for for decades.

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-health-secretary-matt-hancock-orders-urgent-review-into-public-health-england-death-data-12030392

Imagine setting policy on the basis of the figures produced by a department that is this incompetent. We don't need to imagine this because that is what has been happening. So much for our "world class civil service".

Alaric
Lemon Half
Posts: 6062
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 9:05 am
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 1413 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326827

Postby Alaric » July 17th, 2020, 12:25 pm

SalvorHardin wrote:Imagine setting policy on the basis of the figures produced by a department that is this incompetent. We don't need to imagine this because that is what has been happening. So much for our "world class civil service".


It reminds me a bit of the slightly baffling statistics that students always showed a net immigration total despite the obvious point that courses are only for a limited period of time. It turns out that rather than counting them out and counting them back they just measured the number of students coming to the UK to study and offset that by the number of UK students leaving.

scotia
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3566
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 2376 times
Been thanked: 1946 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326829

Postby scotia » July 17th, 2020, 12:27 pm

SalvorHardin wrote:Increasingly it looks like the authorities have decided to base their advice on this video from the American singer and comedienne Adley Stump, which she made last April (it's a spoof press announcement about the rules for dealing with the coronavirus).

If you want to get a true estimate of the effect of Covid-19 on deaths , simply look at the excess mortality statistics compared to historical averages - and ignore any attempts to identify which are or are not associated with Covid-19. The UK peak is obvious - and hopefully we should see a dip below the multi-year average, due to a number of frail and elderly persons having died slightly prematurely. Another useful statistic is the number of persons in intensive care - again compared to historical averages. And just ignore the English statistics, whether or not they have a statistical anomaly.

ursaminortaur
Lemon Half
Posts: 7040
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:26 pm
Has thanked: 456 times
Been thanked: 1748 times

Re: Coronavirus - General Chat - No statistics

#326842

Postby ursaminortaur » July 17th, 2020, 1:05 pm

Mike4 wrote:
dealtn wrote:
Leothebear wrote:Has there been any progress determining whether surviving the virus gives the survivor immunity?


Not that I've seen. Although I think there have been 14 million or so known cases across the world, and as far as I know they haven't found anyone who has "got it" twice yet. I think it's one of those things that is difficult to prove scientifically, but anecdotally it appears to be the case, although it isn't known how long such an immunity lasts.


There are 'lots' of anecdotal cases of people getting it twice according to Dr Martenson. He did an in depth video recently examining the possibility and includes an interview with the doctor husband of one proven case. The doctor's wife caught it, recovered including negative PCR tests, then caught it again three months later IIRC. Will see if I can find it.

Here it is. He's rather 'hyper' in delivery but his content seems thorough.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhyEBIpaIaM

P.S. skip forward and start watching at 2.00 minutes where discussion of this subject begins.


There were reports only a few days ago suggesting that immunity after infection only lasts a few months

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-immunity-may-only-last-a-few-months-study-suggests-12027655


Return to “Coronavirus Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests