Lootman wrote:Fair enough, but there are also humane ways to rear and feed animals, and prepare them for consumption. So if the concern is moral rather than health, the solution isn't necessarily avoiding meat but simply being more selective about meat. isn't that what the whole "free range" movement is about?
"Free range" if applied to human prisoners would be considered an egregious violation of their human rights. With an exception for sheep on open moorland, any farm animal that gets a bit of space[1] is totally non-commercial.
didds wrote:clearly not to those vegans, (insofar as they exist in real life) who have a zero tolerance, black and white, binary approach AIUI. Its their call after all.
FTFY