Article by Bruce Stout (manager of Murray International Investment Trust)
https://www.trustnet.com/news/13362801/ ... ruce-stout
(Not read it as I'm off out but might be of interest).
Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to Wasron,jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly, for Donating to support the site
Income monopoly - Bruce Stout
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: January 7th, 2017, 9:56 am
- Has thanked: 1549 times
- Been thanked: 3445 times
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 16629
- Joined: October 10th, 2017, 11:33 am
- Has thanked: 4343 times
- Been thanked: 7536 times
Re: Income monopoly - Bruce Stout
monabri wrote:Article by Bruce Stout (manager of Murray International Investment Trust)
https://www.trustnet.com/news/13362801/ ... ruce-stout
(Not read it as I'm off out but might be of interest).
Thanks. I like Bruce Stout and so like to know his views. Not a great deal in the article that most of us would not know but we have seen a number of UK companies 'resetting' their dividends because payouts got just too generous. I am thinking of HSBC, Shell and Imperial Brands for three. No doubt there are others .Companies do not like cutting their dividends but being too generous catches up with them in the end.
Dod
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: November 7th, 2016, 1:56 pm
- Has thanked: 1587 times
- Been thanked: 1417 times
Re: Income monopoly - Bruce Stout
Sloppy journalism.
Both of the companies quoted, GSK and BATS, turned over the majority of their income outside of the UK, according to the notes in their (2021) financial statements. As is the case for many others from FTSE100.
I suspect what the article meant to say was "UK domiciled or listed companies". But what it doesn't say, and should have done, is that UK retail investors like you and I suffer additional income eroding costs holding high yield companies from elsewhere - fx and withholding tax typically.
Which is why we tend to stick to "the UK".
Both of the companies quoted, GSK and BATS, turned over the majority of their income outside of the UK, according to the notes in their (2021) financial statements. As is the case for many others from FTSE100.
I suspect what the article meant to say was "UK domiciled or listed companies". But what it doesn't say, and should have done, is that UK retail investors like you and I suffer additional income eroding costs holding high yield companies from elsewhere - fx and withholding tax typically.
Which is why we tend to stick to "the UK".
Return to “High Yield Shares & Strategies - General”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests