Re: CPFC
Posted: March 22nd, 2023, 9:38 am
dionaeamuscipula wrote:pje16 wrote:Oh no. not the Hammers
everyone's 2nd fav team I thought.
Thought wrong.
obvs
obvs
The Lemon Fool
Shares, Investment and Personal Finance Discussion Forums
https://www.lemonfool.co.uk/
CPFC
Page 2 of 2
obvs
Re: CPFC
Posted: April 3rd, 2023, 3:38 pm
Well, much to everyone's surprise, Palace came out looking revitalised to start Roy H's 2nd tenure. They tore into Leicester in the first half, having 20 shots to Leicester's 0. No goals though.
To nobody's surprise it was the Foxes who scored first and they were slightly better in the 2nd half. Palace equalised and got the winner they so deserved with just about the last kick of the match. Rapture at Selhurst, first win in 2023!
Palace had 31 shots against the Foxes 3 and Rodgers said Leicester didn't deserve to lose. Not sure his board agreed however!
If Palace had a half decent striker I'd be far more confident about their PL survival. Not out of the woods just yet.
Leo
To nobody's surprise it was the Foxes who scored first and they were slightly better in the 2nd half. Palace equalised and got the winner they so deserved with just about the last kick of the match. Rapture at Selhurst, first win in 2023!
Palace had 31 shots against the Foxes 3 and Rodgers said Leicester didn't deserve to lose. Not sure his board agreed however!
If Palace had a half decent striker I'd be far more confident about their PL survival. Not out of the woods just yet.
Leo