Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to waiting4godot,yyuryyub,88V8,Anonymous,Fluke, for Donating to support the site

NTEA

Gilts, bonds, and interest-bearing shares
OldBoyReturns
Lemon Pip
Posts: 89
Joined: November 21st, 2019, 11:44 pm
Been thanked: 64 times

Re: NTEA

#646405

Postby OldBoyReturns » February 12th, 2024, 12:45 pm

Jwdool wrote:What was the market price of the Tate & Lyle when they were cancelled? Were holders compensated?


Here you go:

https://www.tateandlyle.com/sites/defau ... eeting.pdf

Resolution 22 on page 6 plus Explanatory Note on page 7. Coupon was 6.5% and return of capital was at nominal value plus payment for accrued dividend with no additional compensation as far as I can see.

88V8
Lemon Half
Posts: 5657
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:22 am
Has thanked: 3953 times
Been thanked: 2490 times

Re: NTEA

#646437

Postby 88V8 » February 12th, 2024, 3:12 pm

OldBoyReturns wrote:
Jwdool wrote:What was the market price of the Tate & Lyle when they were cancelled? Were holders compensated?

...no additional compensation as far as I can see.

No.

Looks as if they were trading around ten points above par pre-announcement.
Probably few holders and not worthwhile for them to make a fuss.
As you say, it does illustrate that the possibility is not totally off the table.

V8

NealMorris
Posts: 33
Joined: March 19th, 2018, 9:32 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: NTEA

#646490

Postby NealMorris » February 12th, 2024, 7:07 pm

So NTEA, another dodgy one then

hostye
Posts: 25
Joined: November 15th, 2022, 1:59 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: NTEA

#646690

Postby hostye » February 13th, 2024, 2:32 pm

NealMorris wrote:So NTEA, another dodgy one then



Only dodgy if you fail to read or understand the documentation!
I would think the repayment at par clause was originally inserted to give investors comfort they would likely get their money back if the licence was lost (essentially a back stop bid).

I suspect any attempt to re-nationalise would entail some degree of fairness towards owners/shareholders etc and I can't see Berkshire Hathaway rolling over too easily to accept a below market value offer from the UK Government. They will want at least fair market value. Could get messy but I reckon I know who has the better lawyers!
Looking back at some old notes Berkshire Hathaway owned 69% of the pref and 92% of the equity (possibly this could have changed but unlikely by any significant amount).

At current prices the market is pricing in this uncertainty/risk in my opinion.

Also worth reading Ofgem's terms of revoking licences here
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications/e ... conditions.


Return to “Gilts and Bonds”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Holts, Padders72 and 5 guests