Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to Wasron,jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly, for Donating to support the site

Investment Trusts recent performance since Covid 19

Closed-end funds and OEICs
richfool
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3530
Joined: November 19th, 2016, 2:02 pm
Has thanked: 1208 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

Investment Trusts recent performance since Covid 19

#295034

Postby richfool » March 28th, 2020, 10:15 am

I came across this Citywire article with tables of recent performance.

FGT held up better in the UK sector, as did CTY and TIGT. TMPL as we know fared worst.
Corona Crash: Train’s Finsbury Growth holds up better in horror month for UK trusts

https://citywire.co.uk/investment-trust ... st-insider

Julian
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1389
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:58 am
Has thanked: 534 times
Been thanked: 677 times

Re: Investment Trusts recent performance since Covid 19

#295058

Postby Julian » March 28th, 2020, 11:15 am

richfool wrote:...
FGT held up better in the UK sector, as did CTY and TIGT. TMPL as we know fared worst.
...

Thanks. That article is a really convenient one-stop-shop to assess the recent carnage.

If you're setting the "held up better" bar at the CTY level (31.3% drop in the last month) then I note that Murray Income (MUT) dropped 31.7% so pretty much identical to CTY but the 5 year total NAV return is -12.4% for CTY vs +0.2%(*) for MUT. I also note that on NAV for the last month CTY is at -33.5% vs MUT at -30.8%. All things considered I think MUT deserves a place alongside CTY in the "held up better" club.

I'm not a MUT shareholder at the moment by the way. My core UK income IT holding is in CTY but I am one of those people who doesn't like to have all his eggs in one basket so, although there is the counter argument expressed by some that there is no real point diversifying too much amongst the UK income ITs because most have broadly the same underlying big holdings, I like to have exposure to different manager behaviours and the tails of the holding tend to be quite different. In that light I'd actually been looking at adding MUT as a diversification partner to sit alongside CTY for quite a while but before this crisis hit the yield on MUT was just a bit below what I was aiming for. With the recent share price collapses and hence significantly higher yields (assuming dividends are maintained which for ITs with a long unbroken record to preserve I don't think is an unreasonable assumption) the current 5.17% yield on MUT is well over my threshold. As and when I start putting some cash I have sitting on the sidelines back into the market MUT might well be joining my portfolio to sit alongside my CTY holding.

- Julian

(*) I thought I'd better put in an explit "+" sign since in these times it would be all to easy to assume I had a erratic "-" key and the lack of a "-" was a typo!

monabri
Lemon Half
Posts: 8427
Joined: January 7th, 2017, 9:56 am
Has thanked: 1549 times
Been thanked: 3445 times

Re: Investment Trusts recent performance since Covid 19

#295060

Postby monabri » March 28th, 2020, 11:17 am

Hmmm, it has taken a beating...note Vanguard fund's relative performance....pretty much replicated by CTY.

Image

monabri
Lemon Half
Posts: 8427
Joined: January 7th, 2017, 9:56 am
Has thanked: 1549 times
Been thanked: 3445 times

Re: Investment Trusts recent performance since Covid 19

#295065

Postby monabri » March 28th, 2020, 11:28 am

I bet SUPP holders were really chuffed... :o (salt in the wound?)

richfool
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3530
Joined: November 19th, 2016, 2:02 pm
Has thanked: 1208 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

Re: Investment Trusts recent performance since Covid 19

#295075

Postby richfool » March 28th, 2020, 11:54 am

Julian wrote:
richfool wrote:...
FGT held up better in the UK sector, as did CTY and TIGT. TMPL as we know fared worst.
...

Thanks. That article is a really convenient one-stop-shop to assess the recent carnage.

If you're setting the "held up better" bar at the CTY level (31.3% drop in the last month) then I note that Murray Income (MUT) dropped 31.7% so pretty much identical to CTY but the 5 year total NAV return is -12.4% for CTY vs +0.2%(*) for MUT. I also note that on NAV for the last month CTY is at -33.5% vs MUT at -30.8%. All things considered I think MUT deserves a place alongside CTY in the "held up better" club.

I'm not a MUT shareholder at the moment by the way. My core UK income IT holding is in CTY but I am one of those people who doesn't like to have all his eggs in one basket so, although there is the counter argument expressed by some that there is no real point diversifying too much amongst the UK income ITs because most have broadly the same underlying big holdings, I like to have exposure to different manager behaviours and the tails of the holding tend to be quite different. In that light I'd actually been looking at adding MUT as a diversification partner to sit alongside CTY for quite a while but before this crisis hit the yield on MUT was just a bit below what I was aiming for. With the recent share price collapses and hence significantly higher yields (assuming dividends are maintained which for ITs with a long unbroken record to preserve I don't think is an unreasonable assumption) the current 5.17% yield on MUT is well over my threshold. As and when I start putting some cash I have sitting on the sidelines back into the market MUT might well be joining my portfolio to sit alongside my CTY holding.

- Julian

(*) I thought I'd better put in an explit "+" sign since in these times it would be all to easy to assume I had a erratic "-" key and the lack of a "-" was a typo!

Your comments on MUT noted and very much agreed.

I did in fact switch from CTY to MUT a couple of years back. MUT is now my main UK G&I trust (with emphasis on the "income"). I then hold FGT for quality/conviction holdings) and TIGT (for a more conservative perhaps higher growth and a bit less income trust).

A shame the article & tables didn't include the Flexible sector. I have a significant holding of MATE & a small quantity of BMPI in that sector.


Return to “Investment Trusts and Unit Trusts”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests