Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to Wasron,jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly, for Donating to support the site

ITs squealing about cost disclosure

Closed-end funds and OEICs
Dumbo
Posts: 34
Joined: June 7th, 2019, 7:37 pm
Has thanked: 137 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: ITs squealing about cost disclosure

#648396

Postby Dumbo » February 21st, 2024, 6:14 pm

Thanks for the links DavidM13

Newroad
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1098
Joined: November 23rd, 2019, 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: ITs squealing about cost disclosure

#650576

Postby Newroad » March 1st, 2024, 5:38 pm

Hi All.

I don't know if this is directly related to the preceding conversation, but ...

... today I went on to IBKR to top-up my SCP holding (purchased in December). I got a message that to buy (any more) SCP - or THRG or any other Investment Trust - I would need to apply for CLP Trading Permissions (i.e. a Complex or Leveraged Product). This seems crazy - Investment Trusts, notwithstanding they often use modest leverage, are more akin to a Mutual Fund than a Derivative.

I've updated my account information and applied for the next level or permissions up (it goes, in short form, Capital Preservation -> Growth -> Hedging -> Speculation): I'm currently classified as Growth and have applied for Hedging. This goes to show the absurdity - Investment Trusts have little to do with hedging :( As we sit here now, I am waiting for a decision.

Crazy stuff IMO.

Regards, Newroad

Alaric
Lemon Half
Posts: 6068
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 9:05 am
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 1419 times

Re: ITs squealing about cost disclosure

#650635

Postby Alaric » March 1st, 2024, 8:03 pm

Newroad wrote:I've updated my account information and applied for the next level or permissions up (it goes, in short form, Capital Preservation -> Growth -> Hedging -> Speculation): I'm currently classified as Growth and have applied for Hedging. This goes to show the absurdity - Investment Trusts have little to do with hedging :( As we sit here now, I am waiting for a decision.


That would seem to be the Broker gold plating FCA requirements, although perhaps it's the fault of the FCA in the first place showing a lack of understanding of Investment Trusts.

GeoffF100
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4769
Joined: November 14th, 2016, 7:33 pm
Has thanked: 178 times
Been thanked: 1379 times

Re: ITs squealing about cost disclosure

#650643

Postby GeoffF100 » March 1st, 2024, 8:15 pm

It is not just IBKR. AJ Bell is doing the same:

https://moneyforums.citywire.com/yaf_po ... tment.aspx

I have not checked iWeb, but I expect they are doing the same.

XFool
The full Lemon
Posts: 12636
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
Been thanked: 2609 times

Re: ITs squealing about cost disclosure

#650646

Postby XFool » March 1st, 2024, 8:20 pm

Alaric wrote:
Newroad wrote:I've updated my account information and applied for the next level or permissions up (it goes, in short form, Capital Preservation -> Growth -> Hedging -> Speculation): I'm currently classified as Growth and have applied for Hedging. This goes to show the absurdity - Investment Trusts have little to do with hedging :( As we sit here now, I am waiting for a decision.

That would seem to be the Broker gold plating FCA requirements, although perhaps it's the fault of the FCA in the first place showing a lack of understanding of Investment Trusts.

Sounds to me it is likely more to do with the nature of the IBKR broker - which seems to be a US based 'trading' platform.

https://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/home.php

Then I see "SCP" isn't an investment trust.

EthicsGradient
Lemon Slice
Posts: 584
Joined: March 1st, 2019, 11:33 am
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 235 times

Re: ITs squealing about cost disclosure

#650656

Postby EthicsGradient » March 1st, 2024, 8:32 pm

XFool wrote:
Alaric wrote:That would seem to be the Broker gold plating FCA requirements, although perhaps it's the fault of the FCA in the first place showing a lack of understanding of Investment Trusts.

Sounds to me it is likely more to do with the nature of the IBKR broker - which seems to be a US based 'trading' platform.

https://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/home.php

Then I see "SCP" isn't an investment trust.

Is there confusion here due to use of initials? This 'SCP' - Schroder UK Mid Cap Fund plc - says it is an investment trust: https://www.schroders.com/en-gb/uk/indi ... -fund-plc/

The citywire.com thread about SCP and AJ Bell is 3 years old.

XFool
The full Lemon
Posts: 12636
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
Been thanked: 2609 times

Re: ITs squealing about cost disclosure

#650665

Postby XFool » March 1st, 2024, 8:51 pm

EthicsGradient wrote:
XFool wrote:Then I see "SCP" isn't an investment trust.

Is there confusion here due to use of initials? This 'SCP' - Schroder UK Mid Cap Fund plc - says it is an investment trust: https://www.schroders.com/en-gb/uk/indi ... -fund-plc/

The citywire.com thread about SCP and AJ Bell is 3 years old.

So it is! The word "fund" threw me... :oops:

taken2often
Lemon Slice
Posts: 382
Joined: November 9th, 2016, 12:10 pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Re: ITs squealing about cost disclosure

#651267

Postby taken2often » March 4th, 2024, 9:40 pm

I have just come accross this Post. Reading an article Sunday Mail March 3 page 84 Headline
Investment Trusts are battered by Bizarre EU Rules.
I buy investment Trusts. Have done so for over 25 years. Did not understand the current higher discount and yield on quality Trusts. Now I know why . This is part two of Corruption at its finest. Part one was KID That wiped out the US and Global closed funds markets. This is part 2 British Investment Trusts. The Big Fund houses do not like them, not money makers. That is why we are unlikely to get a murmur out of them. To them less IT,s more Unit Trusts. The money makers. The individuals in the Government promoting this should be identified and outed, ensure they never get employed by the UNIT Trust Industry as a reward for their corruption.

A UNIT Trust Index is usually OK A Fund run by a Fund Manager is always at risk. If a run starts they have to sell shares to pay the investor. At some point they have to stop and freeze the Fund. Thats when you really lose, as it can take years to gather funds to pay you off. Property Funds are the worst once, buyers know that its a forced sale, they cut and cut their offers.

An Investment trusts buys shares.; You pay the market rate. They do not have to sell anything to pay you. In fact if the market crashes they can borrow and buy cheap shares. Great for those who invest for income. A down market is a buying opportunity.


Return to “Investment Trusts and Unit Trusts”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests