Fidelity Index World P Acc is currently down 3.43% today are according to ii
iShares Core MSCI World ETF GB is currently up 6.6% according to ii
I know they are not identical but even so it's quite a gap
Jon
Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to eyeball08,Wondergirly,scotia,elkay,ElCid, for Donating to support the site
I didn't realise there was such a big difference between global trackers
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 753
- Joined: March 1st, 2019, 11:33 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: I didn't realise there was such a big difference between global trackers
The Fidelity fund is an OEIC; this is valued once a day, and a figure you see today on ii will be the valuation some time yesterday (google "valuation point" with a fund name if you want to see the precise time; many are 1200 British time).
The iShares is an ETF; this shows a live (perhaps 15 minute delayed) trading price.
So the Fidelity figure shows that the Wed valuation was 3.43% below the Tuesday one; the iShares that it's up 6.6% on yesterday's close (which was before the Trump U turn).
This is why I try and look at my portfolio value during the weekend; everything is shown as the close-of-Friday-business price, and OEICs and ETFs are on an equal footing.
The iShares is an ETF; this shows a live (perhaps 15 minute delayed) trading price.
So the Fidelity figure shows that the Wed valuation was 3.43% below the Tuesday one; the iShares that it's up 6.6% on yesterday's close (which was before the Trump U turn).
This is why I try and look at my portfolio value during the weekend; everything is shown as the close-of-Friday-business price, and OEICs and ETFs are on an equal footing.
-
- 2 Lemon pips
- Posts: 107
- Joined: November 13th, 2016, 8:21 pm
- Has thanked: 151 times
- Been thanked: 45 times
Re: I didn't realise there was such a big difference between global trackers
EthicsGradient wrote:The Fidelity fund is an OEIC; this is valued once a day, and a figure you see today on ii will be the valuation some time yesterday (google "valuation point" with a fund name if you want to see the precise time; many are 1200 British time).
The iShares is an ETF; this shows a live (perhaps 15 minute delayed) trading price.
So the Fidelity figure shows that the Wed valuation was 3.43% below the Tuesday one; the iShares that it's up 6.6% on yesterday's close (which was before the Trump U turn).
This is why I try and look at my portfolio value during the weekend; everything is shown as the close-of-Friday-business price, and OEICs and ETFs are on an equal footing.
Ah, excellent, thank you. I had forgotten about that aspect so with a bit of luck Fidelity will catch up tomorrow.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5281
- Joined: November 14th, 2016, 7:33 pm
- Has thanked: 200 times
- Been thanked: 1535 times
Re: I didn't realise there was such a big difference between global trackers
EthicsGradient wrote:This is why I try and look at my portfolio value during the weekend; everything is shown as the close-of-Friday-business price, and OEICs and ETFs are on an equal footing.
I do the same, but the prices are not really on an equal footing. My OEICs will have been valued at 12:00 and 21:00 London time, whereas my ETFs will have been valued at 16:30 London time.
The OP should also note that ETFs can trade at a discount or premium to Net Asset Value (NAV). OEICs can be subject to swing pricing, so the valuation can also be at a discount or premium to NAV.
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 753
- Joined: March 1st, 2019, 11:33 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: I didn't realise there was such a big difference between global trackers
GeoffF100 wrote:EthicsGradient wrote:This is why I try and look at my portfolio value during the weekend; everything is shown as the close-of-Friday-business price, and OEICs and ETFs are on an equal footing.
I do the same, but the prices are not really on an equal footing. My OEICs will have been valued at 12:00 and 21:00 London time, whereas my ETFs will have been valued at 16:30 London time.
The OP should also note that ETFs can trade at a discount or premium to Net Asset Value (NAV). OEICs can be subject to swing pricing, so the valuation can also be at a discount or premium to NAV.
True, I suppose - but I think it's the closest you can get to an equal footing - half a market day (in Europe, or in the USA). If you look at a valuation on a weekday evening, an OEIC could be a day-and-a-half out of date.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 5281
- Joined: November 14th, 2016, 7:33 pm
- Has thanked: 200 times
- Been thanked: 1535 times
Re: I didn't realise there was such a big difference between global trackers
EthicsGradient wrote:GeoffF100 wrote:I do the same, but the prices are not really on an equal footing. My OEICs will have been valued at 12:00 and 21:00 London time, whereas my ETFs will have been valued at 16:30 London time.
The OP should also note that ETFs can trade at a discount or premium to Net Asset Value (NAV). OEICs can be subject to swing pricing, so the valuation can also be at a discount or premium to NAV.
True, I suppose - but I think it's the closest you can get to an equal footing - half a market day (in Europe, or in the USA). If you look at a valuation on a weekday evening, an OEIC could be a day-and-a-half out of date.
Do I need to value my portfolio every week? Not really. I have quarterly dividends, and make quarterly ISA contributions. Once a quarter should be enough.
Morningstar gives the date of the valuation for each line item. The valuations are not always up to date, so it is important to check, and use another source when necessary.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest