bungeejumper wrote:And I haven't even started on the need to download yet another app on her mobile, just so that she can talk to the bloody machines in the first place!
Rule number one. Never buy a car that needs a phone to work.
Thanks to gpadsa,Steffers0,lansdown,Wasron,jfgw, for Donating to support the site
bungeejumper wrote:And I haven't even started on the need to download yet another app on her mobile, just so that she can talk to the bloody machines in the first place!
Lootman wrote:Rule number one. Never buy a car that needs a phone to work.
bungeejumper wrote:airbus330 wrote:Too many unknown unknowns to plonk 40k on what could be a rapidly depreciating asset.
Funny if diesel ends up being the go to choice for us Luddites in our ICE cars, sharing the remaining fuel stops with the truckers!
Fer chrissake. Ain't gonna happen. Not for my wife, not for anybody who can choose to buy 500 miles' worth of fuel at a forecourt in the daytime and then complete her (return) journey with no worries.
BJ
AF62 wrote:Lootman wrote:Rule number one. Never buy a car that needs a phone to work.
But always buy a car that you can plug a phone into to use Apple CarPlay or the Google alternative, as that is far better than the built in systems.
airbus330 wrote:It is a shame that the BEV infrastructure roll out is such an on going cluster f as the simplicity of BEV and the future potential of autopilot could be a huge boon to the elderly or disabled.
JohnB wrote:The secondhand market is very new for BEVs, and will take a long time to get to the predictability we have for ICEs, where non-enthusiasts understand what nice little runners and bangers are. But once we get a clear view of real-world battery lifetimes, then repair and maintenance costs should be less than for ICEs, as there are just fewer moving parts and less thermal cycling. I agree that with fast change early models will be stranded with very poor resale value, and you could be bitten with software abandonment, but otherwise an automatic BEV with lots of assists and fading range could be a good granny choice.
One key thing about BEVs is the total cost of ownership is lower because the higher purchase price is offset against lower fuel costs. This has always been true for ICEs with better mpg having more attraction when younger, but is more extreme for BEVs, and may introduce a bigger purchase barrier, forcing those on limited budgets to buy older cars than they would like. But with 10 years before ICEs start falling out of segments of the secondhand market, there is plenty of time to adapt.
Lootman wrote: If you are over 50, and I suspect that most here are, then you can ignore BEVs.
scotview wrote:Lootman wrote: If you are over 50, and I suspect that most here are, then you can ignore BEVs.
No you can't.
It is written into cross party legislation that ICE vehicles are going to be outlawed. This legislation isn't negotiable and has already caused a massive (and irreversible) change of direction for the car industry. A lot of the above discussion in this thread is irrelevant because choice is being removed by statute.
Lootman wrote:But when would this "outlawing" take place?
scotview wrote:Lootman wrote: If you are over 50, and I suspect that most here are, then you can ignore BEVs.
No you can't.
It is written into cross party legislation that ICE vehicles are going to be outlawed.
AF62 wrote:airbus330 wrote:It is a shame that the BEV infrastructure roll out is such an on going cluster f as the simplicity of BEV and the future potential of autopilot could be a huge boon to the elderly or disabled.
Have you actually used the BEV infrastructure recently?
airbus330 wrote: unless the government seriously change course,
scotview wrote:airbus330 wrote: unless the government seriously change course,
Do you think that a change of course can happen now, after the likes of VW has gone through a massive pain barrier that is risking it's very existence.
I find it hard to personally appreciate the massive technical effort the car manufacturers have made to implement BEV strategies. I certainly cannot conceive of them having to reverse the existential changes they have made.
Even at this stage of net zero implementation we have gone through a historic level event which I dont think the man in the street can possibly comprehend. I personally don't know if this pain has been or will be worth it.
airbus330 wrote:AF62 wrote:
Have you actually used the BEV infrastructure recently?
Nope, as I don't own one.But I have a 2 local family members and a friend who are very early adopters , the friend is on BEV #3 and the 1 family member is using a very early Leaf owned from new. The other is a late convert with an ID3, bought mainly for tax reasons So, from this I can get a fairly good idea of the infrastructure in South Wales. The same story time after time is unreliable charging on any trip that is beyond there and back. One of the cars is used to commercially visit farms in rural Wales, he is comfortable planning his journeys to the nearest metre and it works for him because he is totally committed to the tech. The other 2 have ICE cars for any journey that takes them out of their 'there and back range'. All report an increase in charger availability, but the rate of occasions where they are unable to charge due to the charger being broken or there being a queue to get on a charger makes them shy away from relying on the BEV.
BEV's make sense for shorter trips.
Where you have a home charger.
When your schedule is unlikely to change.
In a city.
They can do anything an ICE car can do, but in an inferior way.
As such, IMO, the BEV, as it stands in 2023, is a technology being forced on us prematurely, for political reasons and, unless the government seriously change course, will result in a curtailment of the freedom of personal travel which our generation have benefited from. Young people, poor people, disabled people, rural people, trades people will rue the day that, we, the comfortably off allowed it to happen. There is nothing wrong with wanting to have a BEV, but the compulsion really sticks in my throat.
AF62 wrote:As for the number of chargers, well that is supply and demand. Until there are sufficient EV drivers demanding to use them then the commercial suppliers won't be providing them - but that is happening where people are using them, just take a look at any motorway service area and the ranks and ranks of new chargers.
So to say that the situation in rural Wales is typical of the situation across the whole of the UK is a bit of a stretch.
bungeejumper wrote:But for those of us who depend on more out-of-the-way rural routes, the calculation is whether or not I dare to attempt a journey across Salisbury Plain/North York Moors/mid-Wales, in the full knowledge that there's a goodish chance that the charging station on my map won't be working, or won't want to work with my particular car. Or that I can't get a mobile signal when it matters.
AF62 wrote:airbus330 wrote:
So to say that the situation in rural Wales is typical of the situation across the whole of the UK is a bit of a stretch.
Return to “Cars, Driving, Motorbikes or any Transport”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests