Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva,scotia,Anonymous,Cornytiv34, for Donating to support the site

Wealth tax academic paper

including Budgets
scrumpyjack
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4809
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:15 am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 2673 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#373127

Postby scrumpyjack » January 4th, 2021, 6:57 pm

A lot simpler for HMG just to write off the debt it owes to itself, and that is quite a big number, and neither the creditor nor the debtor will be upset!

johnhemming
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3858
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:13 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#373143

Postby johnhemming » January 4th, 2021, 7:53 pm

scrumpyjack wrote:A lot simpler for HMG just to write off the debt it owes to itself, and that is quite a big number, and neither the creditor nor the debtor will be upset!

If it is left as it is then there are circular book entries for interest that go on for ever. There is an argument for the ability to reduce M0 through the sale of the debt to the market by the Bank of England.

Moosehoosenew
Lemon Pip
Posts: 69
Joined: December 16th, 2019, 8:59 am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#376390

Postby Moosehoosenew » January 12th, 2021, 10:06 pm

This is a great discussion

I would be ok with the wealth tax, not sure what the base figure would be. I feel those of us over 55 have done well and if we are wealthy we can afford it.

If we are very wealthy, IHT is going to duff us up anyway.

In fact I would go so far as to see, our public services are a reflection on an obsession with low tax.


But

if we go too far, capital will move.

and we will never get the the super wealthy this way, to get them put super tax on purchases above a million?

Lootman
The full Lemon
Posts: 18674
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
Has thanked: 628 times
Been thanked: 6557 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#376396

Postby Lootman » January 12th, 2021, 10:26 pm

Moosehoosenew wrote:I feel those of us over 55 have done well and if we are wealthy we can afford it.

The fact that someone can afford to pay more tax is not a reason to tax them more. Unless of course you just think they should be punished for being successful.

Moosehoosenew wrote:If we are very wealthy, IHT is going to duff us up anyway.

Only for those who do not take simple steps to avoid IHT, of which there are many.

Moosehoosenew wrote:In fact I would go so far as to see, our public services are a reflection on an obsession with low tax.

The voters can decide how obsessed they are with taxes not being punitive. And those same voters can decide if they want limits on the public teat.

Moosehoosenew wrote:we will never get the the super wealthy this way, to get them put super tax on purchases above a million?

How hard do you think it is for the global super-wealthy to avoid spending a million in the UK when every other nation wants that money?

Moosehoosenew
Lemon Pip
Posts: 69
Joined: December 16th, 2019, 8:59 am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#376407

Postby Moosehoosenew » January 12th, 2021, 11:00 pm

I was not thinking of us being punished, more that we have done ok and can contribute a bit more

Our taxes versus Northern Europe are very low and in my opinion our public services reflect this

regarding movement of wealth, the super wealthy do move it.

I am not super wealthy but ok thanks, and if I have to say put on £200k next year, happy to do it.

and in regard to IHT if you are remotely wealthy, you will do really well to avoid IHT, I certainly do not think I can avoid it, in spite of sharing with family and others.

I do though would want public sector pensions to be valued correctly to ensure those that have large ones pay their share. Private company pensions are I believe being bought out at huge multiples.

So I imagine a policeman on say 25k index linked, has a poy that should be valued at least a million.

I cannot see how we do not need to ask the wealthy to share a bit more. I could cope with up to 5%, and I doubt it would make a blind bit of difference to my life.

richlist
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1589
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:54 pm
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 477 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#376741

Postby richlist » January 13th, 2021, 7:56 pm

Applying wealth taxes in the UK really cant be that difficult. Other countries in Europe have wealth taxes that work ok for them. Let's just get on with it, we can fine tune as we go.

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6072
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 441 times
Been thanked: 2324 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#376749

Postby dealtn » January 13th, 2021, 8:30 pm

richlist wrote:Applying wealth taxes in the UK really cant be that difficult. Other countries in Europe have wealth taxes that work ok for them. Let's just get on with it, we can fine tune as we go.


Can you define what you mean by work ok please?

richlist
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1589
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:54 pm
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 477 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#376756

Postby richlist » January 13th, 2021, 8:45 pm

No I cant.
I'm not an expert, I have people that do that sort of stuff for me. As this is a discussion forum I thought I'd throw my experience into the ring.

What I do know is that I have property in Spain and i pay an annual wealth tax. It not a large amount, its affordable for me and if it works for Spain it'll very likely work in the UK sooner rather than later.

johnhemming
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3858
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:13 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#376758

Postby johnhemming » January 13th, 2021, 8:51 pm

richlist wrote:What I do know is that I have property in Spain and i pay an annual wealth tax. It not a large amount, its affordable for me and if it works for Spain it'll very likely work in the UK sooner rather than later.

Spain has a property tax and a wealth tax. Do you pay both?

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6072
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 441 times
Been thanked: 2324 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#376759

Postby dealtn » January 13th, 2021, 8:52 pm

richlist wrote:No I cant.
I'm not an expert, I have people that do that sort of stuff for me. As this is a discussion forum I thought I'd throw my experience into the ring.

What I do know is that I have property in Spain and i pay an annual wealth tax. It not a large amount, its affordable for me and if it works for Spain it'll very likely work in the UK sooner rather than later.


So work means "some people pay it". Fair enough but I think most taxes will meet that hurdle of "working". The paper, and the subsequent discussion here, have a bit more depth to it than that.

Moosehoosenew
Lemon Pip
Posts: 69
Joined: December 16th, 2019, 8:59 am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#376787

Postby Moosehoosenew » January 13th, 2021, 9:56 pm

Nothing can be surer than given Covid and an ageing population, taxes will need to rise.

We should involve ourselves in the conversation, those of us over 50 and doing ok.

Right now, it just looks like we are shovelling debt onto the next generation.

Say you have 4 million, 3.5 mill does not look too bad either.

I have a lot of respect for some aspects of higher tax Europe, would have hated it when I was trying to grow a company.

NeilW
Lemon Slice
Posts: 760
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 4:27 pm
Has thanked: 149 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#376842

Postby NeilW » January 14th, 2021, 5:34 am

Moosehoosenew wrote:Nothing can be surer than given Covid and an ageing population, taxes will need to rise..


Why? What physical resources are being used by the private sector that need to be freed up?

Tax has nothing to do with money. We can leave the rich to count their coins and employ everybody at the same time. And when we do the latter we get a boost to productivity, which is what actually funds improvements in the standard of living for all.

Where has this zero-sum mentality come from?

88V8
Lemon Half
Posts: 5766
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:22 am
Has thanked: 4096 times
Been thanked: 2558 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#377022

Postby 88V8 » January 14th, 2021, 12:02 pm

NeilW wrote:We can leave the rich to count their coins and employ everybody at the same time. And when we do the latter we get a boost to productivity, which is what actually funds improvements in the standard of living for all.

That worked well in the USSR. And Cuba. And still works in North Korea.

Oh.

V8

anon155742
Lemon Slice
Posts: 260
Joined: June 13th, 2019, 8:56 pm
Has thanked: 891 times
Been thanked: 160 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#377052

Postby anon155742 » January 14th, 2021, 12:39 pm

https://www.gov.uk/pay-self-assessment-tax-bill/bank-details

There is nothing stopping voluntary contributions to HMRC.

gryffron
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3603
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:00 am
Has thanked: 550 times
Been thanked: 1582 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#377498

Postby gryffron » January 15th, 2021, 2:10 pm

Moderator Message:
Please Note:
This thread is for discussion of Wealth taxes or alternative tax rises that may be implemented.
I have separated the discussions on the meaning of money and debt into their own thread.
Gryffron

Steveam
Lemon Slice
Posts: 974
Joined: March 18th, 2017, 10:22 pm
Has thanked: 1745 times
Been thanked: 534 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#418288

Postby Steveam » June 9th, 2021, 7:33 am

https://www.propublica.org/article/the- ... pockethits

This article just puts some flesh on the bones of how assets are not taxed and the ultra wealthy can minimise income tax (basically have a low income and/or borrow against assets). Wealth taxes may not be the answer but the current policies and implementations are leading to a greater concentration of wealth.

Best wishes,

Steve

Lootman
The full Lemon
Posts: 18674
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
Has thanked: 628 times
Been thanked: 6557 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#418292

Postby Lootman » June 9th, 2021, 8:11 am

Steveam wrote:https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-how-the-wealthiest-avoid-income-tax?utm_source=pocket&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pockethits

This article just puts some flesh on the bones of how assets are not taxed and the ultra wealthy can minimise income tax (basically have a low income and/or borrow against assets). Wealth taxes may not be the answer but the current policies and implementations are leading to a greater concentration of wealth.

The article contains a large flaw. It attempts to compute an "effective tax rate" by dividing the actual tax paid by the increase in wealth for that year. But nobody calculates tax that way, and certainly does not levy tax that way. Much of those gains in wealth are increases in unrealised capital gains. Individuals are not taxed that way so it misleading to include such gains in the computations.

XFool
The full Lemon
Posts: 12636
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
Been thanked: 2608 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#418322

Postby XFool » June 9th, 2021, 10:51 am

Caveat: I have not as yet read the paper. :)

Lootman wrote:
Steveam wrote:https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-how-the-wealthiest-avoid-income-tax?utm_source=pocket&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pockethits

This article just puts some flesh on the bones of how assets are not taxed and the ultra wealthy can minimise income tax (basically have a low income and/or borrow against assets). Wealth taxes may not be the answer but the current policies and implementations are leading to a greater concentration of wealth.

The article contains a large flaw. It attempts to compute an "effective tax rate" by dividing the actual tax paid by the increase in wealth for that year. But nobody calculates tax that way, and certainly does not levy tax that way. Much of those gains in wealth are increases in unrealised capital gains. Individuals are not taxed that way so it misleading to include such gains in the computations.

I would have thought, reading the comment about the paper, that is hardly a "large flaw" - as it sounds likely to me to be the whole point the article is making!

"nobody calculates tax that way, and certainly does not levy tax that way"

Lootman
The full Lemon
Posts: 18674
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:58 pm
Has thanked: 628 times
Been thanked: 6557 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#418331

Postby Lootman » June 9th, 2021, 11:27 am

XFool wrote:Caveat: I have not as yet read the paper. :)

Lootman wrote:
Steveam wrote:https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-how-the-wealthiest-avoid-income-tax?utm_source=pocket&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pockethits

This article just puts some flesh on the bones of how assets are not taxed and the ultra wealthy can minimise income tax (basically have a low income and/or borrow against assets). Wealth taxes may not be the answer but the current policies and implementations are leading to a greater concentration of wealth.

The article contains a large flaw. It attempts to compute an "effective tax rate" by dividing the actual tax paid by the increase in wealth for that year. But nobody calculates tax that way, and certainly does not levy tax that way. Much of those gains in wealth are increases in unrealised capital gains. Individuals are not taxed that way so it misleading to include such gains in the computations.

I would have thought, reading the comment about the paper, that is hardly a "large flaw" - as it sounds likely to me to be the whole point the article is making!

"nobody calculates tax that way, and certainly does not levy tax that way"

I was not suggesting that it is a flaw to consider a wealth tax. And of course some forms of a wealth tax would effectively be a tax on unrealised gains because it would be a tax on the valuation of assets.

What I think is a flaw is to suggest that the current tax rate that some wealthy people pay is 3% or 4%. That is highly misleading. It would be like including any theoretical increase in the value of your home into your tax divisor.

Of course if someone believes that unrealised capital gains should be taxed then that could happen without a wealth tax. Just mark-to-market the value of your investments and properties each year. That is how trading desks are taxed in various countries, although I am not aware that any major nation taxes individuals in that way. It would lead to some very odd outcomes: For example in a year where homes go down in value, do you get a tax refund? There are good reasons why we do not tax people in such ways.

XFool
The full Lemon
Posts: 12636
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
Been thanked: 2608 times

Re: Wealth tax academic paper

#418336

Postby XFool » June 9th, 2021, 11:40 am

...I didn't like the way the article described their version as "The real tax rate". It simply being the rate using their method of taxation. The historical background was interesting.

The issue with falling asset values in a year occurred to me. Obviously there are various possible solutions: a combined yearly Income & Capital Increase/(Decrease) taxation rate. Or a separate fixed small yearly taxation rate on absolute capital value.


Return to “The Economy”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bofh and 8 guests