kiloran wrote:neversay wrote:It's a good time to sell-off the BBC to raise funds for the exchequer.
So the views of some obscure music magazine columnist are sufficient justification to sell off the BBC? Sounds a rather extreme reaction.
--kiloran
Is there anything slightly telling about the contrast between the platform given to that silliness and the platform recently withdrawn from David Starkey over what appear to be equally provocative remarks[1]?
Personally I'll be happy if I never have to encounter that jingoistic nonsense again[2]. But there's kind-of a time and a place for it, and it's
last night of the proms. If you don't like it, don't go to it. But I can't imagine you'd get many takers for banning it!
[1] Speaking from ignorance - I haven't gone to the originals of either of these, so I've only heard out-of-context reports.
[2] No objection to the music, but making it tribal detracts from it. Elgar was about as keen on that happening to his music as certain pop stars are about their songs being used for Trump's rallies.