Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77, for Donating to support the site

Musk endeavours

The Big Picture Place
Howard
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2193
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:26 pm
Has thanked: 887 times
Been thanked: 1021 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#311752

Postby Howard » May 24th, 2020, 3:00 pm

Have GM stolen a march on Tesla?

https://cleantechnica.com/2020/05/23/gm ... ile-range/

If GM batteries have a life of a million miles and give a car a range of 600+ miles then Tesla's battery day may prove a bit "flat" ;)

Once this range is achieved by competitors, it is going to be difficult to justify a price premium for Tesla's old fashioned battery design.

Obviously there is more to Tesla than just cars, but margins are getting tighter and profits seem even further away.

No doubt the true believers will prefer Tesla hype to GM hype. However this may be a sign that battery technology is developing fast and other car manufacturers may be able to leapfrog into longer range batteries without incurring the losses Tesla have made developing the current technology?

regards

Howard

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6439
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1562 times
Been thanked: 975 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#311765

Postby odysseus2000 » May 24th, 2020, 4:19 pm

Howard wrote:Have GM stolen a march on Tesla?

https://cleantechnica.com/2020/05/23/gm ... ile-range/

If GM batteries have a life of a million miles and give a car a range of 600+ miles then Tesla's battery day may prove a bit "flat" ;)

Once this range is achieved by competitors, it is going to be difficult to justify a price premium for Tesla's old fashioned battery design.

Obviously there is more to Tesla than just cars, but margins are getting tighter and profits seem even further away.

No doubt the true believers will prefer Tesla hype to GM hype. However this may be a sign that battery technology is developing fast and other car manufacturers may be able to leapfrog into longer range batteries without incurring the losses Tesla have made developing the current technology?

regards

Howard


They say their new factory will be production ready by 2025.

Maybe, but 5 years is a very long time in technology and so we will have to see what comes out is available for sale.

Regards,

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6098
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 443 times
Been thanked: 2343 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#311778

Postby dealtn » May 24th, 2020, 4:44 pm

odysseus2000 wrote:
Howard wrote:Have GM stolen a march on Tesla?

https://cleantechnica.com/2020/05/23/gm ... ile-range/

If GM batteries have a life of a million miles and give a car a range of 600+ miles then Tesla's battery day may prove a bit "flat" ;)

Once this range is achieved by competitors, it is going to be difficult to justify a price premium for Tesla's old fashioned battery design.

Obviously there is more to Tesla than just cars, but margins are getting tighter and profits seem even further away.

No doubt the true believers will prefer Tesla hype to GM hype. However this may be a sign that battery technology is developing fast and other car manufacturers may be able to leapfrog into longer range batteries without incurring the losses Tesla have made developing the current technology?

regards

Howard


They say their new factory will be production ready by 2025.

Maybe, but 5 years is a very long time in technology and so we will have to see what comes out is available for sale.

Regards,


Not quite. The sentence about production ready by 2025 has an "also" in it. I don't know the first thing about this kind of tech, but the effect of the also strongly implies that something will be available before then, and that something will be production ready in 2025. Maybe someone can fill in the gaps here as to what those 2 "somethings" are and the relevance to the GM vs Tesla debate.

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6439
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1562 times
Been thanked: 975 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#311795

Postby odysseus2000 » May 24th, 2020, 5:37 pm

dealtn wrote:
odysseus2000 wrote:
Howard wrote:Have GM stolen a march on Tesla?

https://cleantechnica.com/2020/05/23/gm ... ile-range/

If GM batteries have a life of a million miles and give a car a range of 600+ miles then Tesla's battery day may prove a bit "flat" ;)

Once this range is achieved by competitors, it is going to be difficult to justify a price premium for Tesla's old fashioned battery design.

Obviously there is more to Tesla than just cars, but margins are getting tighter and profits seem even further away.

No doubt the true believers will prefer Tesla hype to GM hype. However this may be a sign that battery technology is developing fast and other car manufacturers may be able to leapfrog into longer range batteries without incurring the losses Tesla have made developing the current technology?

regards

Howard


They say their new factory will be production ready by 2025.

Maybe, but 5 years is a very long time in technology and so we will have to see what comes out is available for sale.

Regards,


Not quite. The sentence about production ready by 2025 has an "also" in it. I don't know the first thing about this kind of tech, but the effect of the also strongly implies that something will be available before then, and that something will be production ready in 2025. Maybe someone can fill in the gaps here as to what those 2 "somethings" are and the relevance to the GM vs Tesla debate.


In the automotive business it is traditional to say all manner of stuff and to loosely throw in dates. E.g. Dyson told the world that he would have a solid state battery and his car would do 600 miles per charge. Even after scrapping the whole project he recently reiterated these statements.

GM has a very long history is saying all manner of things and doing something else. E.g. they had the first battery electric cars, the EV1, which was the future, until they recalled them and crushed them, even having the law with them to make reluctant owners turn over their car to the crusher.

Regards,

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6098
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 443 times
Been thanked: 2343 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#311805

Postby dealtn » May 24th, 2020, 5:57 pm

odysseus2000 wrote:
dealtn wrote:
odysseus2000 wrote:
They say their new factory will be production ready by 2025.

Maybe, but 5 years is a very long time in technology and so we will have to see what comes out is available for sale.

Regards,


Not quite. The sentence about production ready by 2025 has an "also" in it. I don't know the first thing about this kind of tech, but the effect of the also strongly implies that something will be available before then, and that something will be production ready in 2025. Maybe someone can fill in the gaps here as to what those 2 "somethings" are and the relevance to the GM vs Tesla debate.


In the automotive business it is traditional to say all manner of stuff and to loosely throw in dates. E.g. Dyson told the world that he would have a solid state battery and his car would do 600 miles per charge. Even after scrapping the whole project he recently reiterated these statements.

GM has a very long history is saying all manner of things and doing something else. E.g. they had the first battery electric cars, the EV1, which was the future, until they recalled them and crushed them, even having the law with them to make reluctant owners turn over their car to the crusher.

Regards,


None of which answers what I was requesting.

Howard
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2193
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:26 pm
Has thanked: 887 times
Been thanked: 1021 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#311860

Postby Howard » May 24th, 2020, 7:45 pm

odysseus2000 wrote:
dealtn wrote:
odysseus2000 wrote:
They say their new factory will be production ready by 2025.

Maybe, but 5 years is a very long time in technology and so we will have to see what comes out is available for sale.

Regards,


Not quite. The sentence about production ready by 2025 has an "also" in it. I don't know the first thing about this kind of tech, but the effect of the also strongly implies that something will be available before then, and that something will be production ready in 2025. Maybe someone can fill in the gaps here as to what those 2 "somethings" are and the relevance to the GM vs Tesla debate.


In the automotive business it is traditional to say all manner of stuff and to loosely throw in dates. E.g. Dyson told the world that he would have a solid state battery and his car would do 600 miles per charge. Even after scrapping the whole project he recently reiterated these statements.

GM has a very long history is saying all manner of things and doing something else. E.g. they had the first battery electric cars, the EV1, which was the future, until they recalled them and crushed them, even having the law with them to make reluctant owners turn over their car to the crusher.

Regards,


I don't think you are right Ody. Automotive manufacturers have tended to be pretty conservative. It is Tesla which have made all sorts of over-confident forecasts which they have failed to deliver and set dates which they haven't met.

Surely you aren't suggesting Dyson are an automotive company? They haven't sold a single car :? .

GM may not be the most successful car manufacturer in the world, but they do have a long history of achieving automotive goals.

Who knows the future? But it wouldn't be too rash to suggest that car batteries will be a lot different in the next few years? And probably lighter and with longer range?

regards

Howard

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6439
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1562 times
Been thanked: 975 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#311881

Postby odysseus2000 » May 24th, 2020, 9:11 pm

I don't think you are right Ody. Automotive manufacturers have tended to be pretty conservative. It is Tesla which have made all sorts of over-confident forecasts which they have failed to deliver and set dates which they haven't met.

Surely you aren't suggesting Dyson are an automotive company? They haven't sold a single car :? .

GM may not be the most successful car manufacturer in the world, but they do have a long history of achieving automotive goals.

Who knows the future? But it wouldn't be too rash to suggest that car batteries will be a lot different in the next few years? And probably lighter and with longer range?

regards

Howard


Well I had another guffaw about Automotive manufactures tending to be pretty conservative.

Most automotive manufactures can't hit critical dates which is why they rarely mention them and their claims are almost always massively inflated over what a production car can achieve in performance, range and depreciation.

Dyson was just a recent example of the sort of stuff that car makers tend to put out, not that Dyson has ever made a car but he was just a timely example of the sort of guff that comes out in the automotive space.

The problem with saying that car batteries will be a lot different in the next few years is that there may indeed be some advances in the laboratory, but going from something that works great on the test bench to something that works as a practical motor is a non-trivial industrial task that requires a lot of experiments. Then a lot of re-purposing of buildings or making of new buildings, hiring of staff, establishing supplies, ironing out all the production engineering problems etc.

It is possible that someone invents something that is so good, cheap and easy that it becomes the dominant storage technology almost over night, but it is a very low probability event.

Meanwhile Tesla have a big lead in a technology that works, are rapidly advancing that tech and are shortly going to have a battery day on it, while at the same moment have relationships with various battery makers and their own in-house production too and they are selling batteries both via their electric cars and also for storage.

Regards,

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6439
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1562 times
Been thanked: 975 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#312543

Postby odysseus2000 » May 27th, 2020, 7:40 am


odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6439
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1562 times
Been thanked: 975 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#312547

Postby odysseus2000 » May 27th, 2020, 7:46 am

Tesla bearish article:

https://seekingalpha.com/article/435016 ... this-niche

imho, the author hasn't a clue, but no doubt some will find their views amplified by the author.

Regards,

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6098
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 443 times
Been thanked: 2343 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#312606

Postby dealtn » May 27th, 2020, 11:35 am

odysseus2000 wrote:Tesla bearish article:

https://seekingalpha.com/article/435016 ... this-niche

imho, the author hasn't a clue, but no doubt some will find their views amplified by the author.

Regards,


I haven't got a clue either way. So what bits do you disagree with and why?

Howard
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2193
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:26 pm
Has thanked: 887 times
Been thanked: 1021 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#313067

Postby Howard » May 28th, 2020, 3:20 pm

dealtn wrote:
odysseus2000 wrote:Tesla bearish article:

https://seekingalpha.com/article/435016 ... this-niche

imho, the author hasn't a clue, but no doubt some will find their views amplified by the author.

Regards,


I haven't got a clue either way. So what bits do you disagree with and why?


Could I venture a hint? I think Ody may disagree with the article's overall conclusion which is:


"Reviews of surveys show that the inherent limitations of EVs make them a niche product heavily reliant on massive subsidies and specialized purchasers, particularly because there is no economic case for these vehicles. These considerations are borne out by the tiny market share of EVs, compared to total vehicle sales, and the decelerating growth of this market. Within this small and slowly growing market, recent experience in Europe shows that Tesla is rapidly losing market share now that other OEMs are forced to compete. This combination of factors make the projections of one prominent Tesla bull absurd, but they also mean that there is no way that the EV market or Tesla will achieve the growth or profitability needed to justify its current valuation."

I don't think a reasonable reader could disagree with the statement that EVs are a niche product with a tiny share of the auto market. Nor that they have been reliant on massive subsidies (although enthusiasts argue that ICE cars are helped by subsidies of the oil industry).

regards

Howard

PS I'd add that, even with subsidies, Tesla isn't profitable. And their action in cutting prices on all their models (except the Y) suggests that they might have a negative growth problem?

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6098
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 443 times
Been thanked: 2343 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#313116

Postby dealtn » May 28th, 2020, 6:40 pm

Howard wrote:
dealtn wrote:
odysseus2000 wrote:Tesla bearish article:

https://seekingalpha.com/article/435016 ... this-niche

imho, the author hasn't a clue, but no doubt some will find their views amplified by the author.

Regards,


I haven't got a clue either way. So what bits do you disagree with and why?


Could I venture a hint? I think Ody may disagree with the article's overall conclusion ...




Well his argument is rarely made, although with a thread over 200 pages it might have been. Most times a comment is along the lines of "...bears will agree but I think they are wrong...". When challenged what he disagrees with in a bearish article it is either silence or something tangential like "...the author is always bearish/has an axe to grind/doesn't understand secular change..."

It would be interesting to hear the bull case.

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6439
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1562 times
Been thanked: 975 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#313476

Postby odysseus2000 » May 29th, 2020, 8:54 pm

EV sales forecast to surge next year:

https://seekingalpha.com/news/3578754-e ... ent=link-3

Regards,

Howard
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2193
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:26 pm
Has thanked: 887 times
Been thanked: 1021 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#313658

Postby Howard » May 30th, 2020, 12:48 pm

Modest investment in new battery technology by VW. ;)

"Volkswagen is investing around one billion euros in a stake in the Chinese battery manufacturer Gotion High-Tech (also referred to as Guoxuan in other reports) and will become the company’s largest shareholder with 26 per cent. The investment is intended to secure the future demand for battery capacity for the Chinese electric vehicle models. VW stresses that it is the first international OEM to invest directly in a Chinese battery supplier. "

Plus another billion here:

"Volkswagen has officially confirmed its plan to increase its stake in JAC Volkswagen, its joint venture for electric mobility, and to invest around one billion euros in this. "

regards

Howard

https://www.electrive.com/2020/05/29/vw ... in-jac-jv/

PS Daimler are investing too. They claim they will soon be producing 500,000 batteries a year.

https://www.electrive.com/2020/05/27/da ... in-kamenz/

redsturgeon
Lemon Half
Posts: 8962
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
Has thanked: 1324 times
Been thanked: 3693 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#314336

Postby redsturgeon » June 1st, 2020, 4:59 pm

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/caugh ... full-speed

Not good, Tesla crashes at full speed into overturned truck.

John

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6439
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1562 times
Been thanked: 975 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#314369

Postby odysseus2000 » June 1st, 2020, 7:13 pm

redsturgeon wrote:https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/caught-video-tesla-highway-drives-straight-overturned-truck-full-speed

Not good, Tesla crashes at full speed into overturned truck.

John


Horrible crash!

There is some tyre rubber or similar smoke goes up before the crash and then it seems to stop as if the driver or the AI was no longer braking and just continued straight in. The following traffic managed to brake so it is a bit puzzling as to what the driver was doing, but if the AI was on it clearly failed.

Regards,

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6439
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1562 times
Been thanked: 975 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#314442

Postby odysseus2000 » June 2nd, 2020, 7:21 am

Interesting video on 10 of the lowest cost electric cars currently available in the UK:

https://youtu.be/kUEAYIRm8Bs

I personally wouldn't want any of them, just too small for my needs, but for folk who live in urban areas and want to transition to cleaner vehicles they may be of interest, perhaps essential for many folk who live in London and need to get about, but imho more like a generic phone than an iPhone.

Regards,

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6439
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1562 times
Been thanked: 975 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#314531

Postby odysseus2000 » June 2nd, 2020, 1:29 pm

Chinese auto sales recovering, but still down on last year:

https://seekingalpha.com/news/3579488-c ... ent=link-3

Regards,

GoSeigen
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4425
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:14 pm
Has thanked: 1610 times
Been thanked: 1602 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#314696

Postby GoSeigen » June 3rd, 2020, 7:29 am

redsturgeon wrote:https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/caught-video-tesla-highway-drives-straight-overturned-truck-full-speed

Not good, Tesla crashes at full speed into overturned truck.

John


Poor truck driver couldn't believe his eyes!

GS

odysseus2000
Lemon Half
Posts: 6439
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
Has thanked: 1562 times
Been thanked: 975 times

Re: Musk endeavours

#315101

Postby odysseus2000 » June 4th, 2020, 11:51 am

GM said to be creating an electric van:

https://seekingalpha.com/news/3580326-g ... ent=link-3

Regards,


Return to “Macro and Global Topics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests