Re: AI endeavours
Posted: August 26th, 2022, 9:14 am
This is potentially what Tesla bot can do for humanity:
https://youtu.be/LbAMB1h_ins
Regards,
Shares, Investment and Personal Finance Discussion Forums
https://www.lemonfool.co.uk/
On Wednesday, OpenAI announced ChatGPT, a dialogue-based AI chat interface for its GPT-3 family of large language models. It's currently free to use with an OpenAI account during a testing phase. Unlike the GPT-3 model found in OpenAI's Playground and API, ChatGPT provides a user-friendly conversational interface and is designed to strongly limit potentially harmful output.
FURTHER READING
OpenAI upgrades GPT-3, stunning with rhyming poetry and lyrics
"The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer followup questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests," writes OpenAI on its announcement blog page.
So far, people have been putting ChatGPT through its paces, finding a wide variety of potential uses while also exploring its vulnerabilities. It can write poetry, correct coding mistakes with detailed examples, generate AI art prompts, write new code, expound on the philosophical classification of a hot dog as a sandwich, and explain the worst-case time complexity of the bubble sort algorithm... in the style of a "fast-talkin' wise guy from a 1940's gangster movie."
BobbyD wrote:Anybody played with gpt-3 yet?On Wednesday, OpenAI announced ChatGPT, a dialogue-based AI chat interface for its GPT-3 family of large language models. It's currently free to use with an OpenAI account during a testing phase. Unlike the GPT-3 model found in OpenAI's Playground and API, ChatGPT provides a user-friendly conversational interface and is designed to strongly limit potentially harmful output.
FURTHER READING
OpenAI upgrades GPT-3, stunning with rhyming poetry and lyrics
"The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer followup questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests," writes OpenAI on its announcement blog page.
So far, people have been putting ChatGPT through its paces, finding a wide variety of potential uses while also exploring its vulnerabilities. It can write poetry, correct coding mistakes with detailed examples, generate AI art prompts, write new code, expound on the philosophical classification of a hot dog as a sandwich, and explain the worst-case time complexity of the bubble sort algorithm... in the style of a "fast-talkin' wise guy from a 1940's gangster movie."
https://arstechnica.com/information-tec ... g-results/
BobbyD wrote:
It looks a little bit good!
Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak were signatories on an open letter signed by more than 2,600 tech industry leaders and researchers. The open letter called for a temporary halt on any further artificial intelligence (AI) development.
The petition shared concerns that AI with human-competitive intelligence can pose serious hazards to society and mankind. It urged all AI firms to "immediately cease" developing AI systems that are more potent than Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) for at least six months. GPT-4 is a multimodal large language model created by OpenAI and the fourth in its GPT series.
murraypaul wrote:https://cointelegraph.com/news/elon-musk-led-petition-to-halt-ai-development-divides-tech-communityTesla CEO Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak were signatories on an open letter signed by more than 2,600 tech industry leaders and researchers. The open letter called for a temporary halt on any further artificial intelligence (AI) development.
The petition shared concerns that AI with human-competitive intelligence can pose serious hazards to society and mankind. It urged all AI firms to "immediately cease" developing AI systems that are more potent than Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) for at least six months. GPT-4 is a multimodal large language model created by OpenAI and the fourth in its GPT series.
I guess Tesla's AI projects aren't going well.
odysseus2000 wrote:murraypaul wrote:https://cointelegraph.com/news/elon-musk-led-petition-to-halt-ai-development-divides-tech-community
I guess Tesla's AI projects aren't going well.
Ha Ha, Tesla have the most advanced practical AI system on the planet, driving 4,000+ lb cars at highways speeds and also Optimus robots that are beginning to do factory tasks.
If anyone on the plant understands AI and its potential dangers then its Tesla.
odysseus2000 wrote:
Ha Ha, Tesla have the most advanced practical AI system on the planet, driving 4,000+ lb cars at highways speeds and also Optimus robots that are beginning to do factory tasks.
If anyone on the plant understands AI and its potential dangers then its Tesla
Regards,
BobbyD wrote:odysseus2000 wrote:
Ha Ha, Tesla have the most advanced practical AI system on the planet, driving 4,000+ lb cars at highways speeds and also Optimus robots that are beginning to do factory tasks.
If anyone on the plant understands AI and its potential dangers then its Tesla.
Ody, this claim was hilarious thebfirst time you made it, funny the second, but now its just beginning to look like plain old delusion.
Tesla's Fake Self Driving is a joke, Hyundai's Boston Dynamic's bipedal robots could literally kick Optimus's ass, and the idea that Tesla is class leading in practical AI is an insult to anybody who has worked in the field in the last 20 years.
odysseus2000 wrote:BobbyD wrote:
Ody, this claim was hilarious thebfirst time you made it, funny the second, but now its just beginning to look like plain old delusion.
Tesla's Fake Self Driving is a joke, Hyundai's Boston Dynamic's bipedal robots could literally kick Optimus's ass, and the idea that Tesla is class leading in practical AI is an insult to anybody who has worked in the field in the last 20 years.
There have been many studies comparing Tesla AI driving to those offered by competitors and Tesla have been far better. The geofenced systems are not general driving AI.
Boston Dynamics robots are too expensive for anyone but the military whereas Optimus is designed to be makable at low cost.
The idea that the folk who have been doing AI for 20 years have created anything practical is a delusion. Only since the use of neural nets has the AI community created the language model "chats" but they are not operating 4000 lb cars on roads at highway speeds.
Regards,
CliffEdge wrote:odysseus2000 wrote:
Ha Ha, Tesla have the most advanced practical AI system on the planet, driving 4,000+ lb cars at highways speeds and also Optimus robots that are beginning to do factory tasks.
If anyone on the plant understands AI and its potential dangers then its Tesla
Regards,
I don't understand why you think that
BTW the Turing test was always rubbish.
BobbyD
Actually the last comparison which came out ranked Tesla dead last. Fake self driving is a level 2 driver assistance system, and Tesla have advised the California DMV that it will always be a level 2 ADAS.
The Level 4 Geofenced systems you disparage are autonomous, they operate without a driver. They are literally on a different level to the Tesla system.
Optimus has to be carried around the stage by 3 people, where as once again the BD robots actually work!
odysseus2000 wrote:BobbyD
Actually the last comparison which came out ranked Tesla dead last. Fake self driving is a level 2 driver assistance system, and Tesla have advised the California DMV that it will always be a level 2 ADAS.
The Level 4 Geofenced systems you disparage are autonomous, they operate without a driver. They are literally on a different level to the Tesla system.
Optimus has to be carried around the stage by 3 people, where as once again the BD robots actually work!
There have been lots of comparisons of self drive systems and in most cases Tesla are a long way ahead.
Geofenced systems are not general solutions and never can be. Any road works and they fail.
Optimus is able to walk and do simple jobs.
Regards,