Alaric wrote:odysseus2000 wrote:If one uses BEV then one has a distributed electrical system paid for by the buyers of the vehicles. If you have 1 million BEV each providing 1 kWh then you have a 1 GWh facility for very little additional capital cost. If, as I believe is extremely likely, BEV become the predominant vehicles used in the UK, the numbers become large, so that e.g. with 10 million BEV the same 1 kWh per vehicle becomes a 10 GWh distributed power station.
How would that work in practice though? Would it be passive in that at times of power shortage, BEVs would not be charged? Would it be active that the power stored in BEVs would be stripped to supply needs elsewhere. Neither option is very good for the user of a BEV wishing or needing to make a long journey.
We've seen with petrol and diesel powered vehicles that when confidence in the ability to refill disappears, that users attempt to keep their vehicles fully fuelled, so there's a spike in demand, leading to shortages.
I think it would have to be some kind of optional system, where BEV owners who would be happy to see 1 kWh or more taken from their car as needed getting some kind of carrot payment for the energy the car supplies, whereas someone who needs every Watt of power for a journey could opt out. For much of the day most cars are parked doing nothing, so if connected to a grid there would not be much hardship in selling a few kWh at say mid day in summer for A/C demand or similarly in winter for heating demand at night as needed and depending on what the renewables were supplying etc. Given the advances in the internet and switching technology this all seems currently practical.
For it to work it would have to be simple and near invisible to the BEV owner, sort of like the over night operating system upgrades to my iPhone, MacBook are now like.
If robotic driving takes off, that would change the picture as many more cars would be earning when now they are just depreciating on the driveway, car park etc and one would likely need more power walls or similar storage to provide renewable backup etc and probably much larger GW scale battery or pumped storage. Musk estimated that all of China could be powered by solar and that the space for storage would be much smaller than the area taken by the solar panels and a similar calculation was done for the US showing an almost negligible land area used in Texas if everything was place at one spot. Something like 100x100 miles for the solar and 1x1 miles for storage for batteries:
https://cleantechnica.com/2018/06/01/al ... lar-alone/Somewhere on the Musk endeavours board the calculation was checked and seemed fine.
Regards,