Page 1 of 1
Chat GPT
Posted: January 9th, 2023, 9:47 am
by redsturgeon
Game changer or flash in the pan?
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 9th, 2023, 10:12 am
by ursaminortaur
redsturgeon wrote:Game changer or flash in the pan?
There is a thread on this in the Science section
viewtopic.php?p=552063#p552063It seems that ChatGPT is emulating certain humans in a bad way ie it is making things up and citing references which don't exist.
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 9th, 2023, 10:13 am
by CliffEdge
Another nail in the coffin, I'm afraid
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 9th, 2023, 10:20 am
by ReformedCharacter
redsturgeon wrote:Game changer or flash in the pan?
I don't think it's a flash in the pan. As it is right now it's probably not a game changer but the direction of travel suggests that AI will soon become so. My younger son is a games artist working for a subsidiary of a large film and entertainment company. A week or two before ChatGPT became newsworthy he mentioned that colleagues in his industry were wondering how long they had before AI replaced them.
RC
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 9th, 2023, 10:29 am
by redsturgeon
ursaminortaur wrote:redsturgeon wrote:Game changer or flash in the pan?
There is a thread on this in the Science section
viewtopic.php?p=552063#p552063It seems that ChatGPT is emulating certain humans in a bad way ie it is making things up and citing references which don't exist.
I thought this board might be a better place to discuss the wider implications.
John
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 9th, 2023, 10:35 am
by CliffEdge
redsturgeon wrote:ursaminortaur wrote:redsturgeon wrote:Game changer or flash in the pan?
There is a thread on this in the Science section
viewtopic.php?p=552063#p552063It seems that ChatGPT is emulating certain humans in a bad way ie it is making things up and citing references which don't exist.
I thought this board might be a better place to discuss the wider implications.
John
One of the wider implications is that the productivity of the production of disinformation goes through the roof, and becomes an inundation. As if we didn't have enough of a problem already. Those that the gods wish to destroy...
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 9th, 2023, 10:42 am
by mc2fool
redsturgeon wrote:ursaminortaur wrote:redsturgeon wrote:Game changer or flash in the pan?
There is a thread on this in the Science section
viewtopic.php?p=552063#p552063It seems that ChatGPT is emulating certain humans in a bad way ie it is making things up and citing references which don't exist.
I thought this board might be a better place to discuss the wider implications.
John
If by wider implications you mean the effects on the economy, jobs, businesses, work, taxes, massive wealth redistribution, universal basic incomes, the structure of society and other such general socio-economic and political effects, then guess why the other thread has already got to 100 posts ...
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 9th, 2023, 10:44 am
by redsturgeon
mc2fool wrote:redsturgeon wrote:ursaminortaur wrote:redsturgeon wrote:Game changer or flash in the pan?
There is a thread on this in the Science section
viewtopic.php?p=552063#p552063It seems that ChatGPT is emulating certain humans in a bad way ie it is making things up and citing references which don't exist.
I thought this board might be a better place to discuss the wider implications.
John
If by wider implications you mean the effects on the economy, jobs, businesses, work, taxes, massive wealth redistribution, universal basic incomes, the structure of society and other such general socio-economic and political effects, then guess why the other thread has already got to 100 posts ...
It's like herding cats sometimes.
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 9th, 2023, 7:14 pm
by odysseus2000
chatGPT is the first obvious ai that ordinary people can play with.
There are many other applications of ai like Alexa, Siri, route planners, Grammerly,…
But all of these do specific jobs & folk don’t think of them as ai, but this they do & it has come out of nowhere for many & suddenly they begin to see what it can do & compare it’s capability to their own with often distressing implications. How many people can code, draw up legal documents, create computer art,…
For me it’s kind of amusing as it has been obvious that this ai singularity will be technically possible in the near term, but most of the people I have discussed it with have thought I was barking.
As things now are a lot of human jobs can now be done better by ai & like Arkwright water frame this is not going to be welcomed with open arms. There is likely to be trouble at ai.
Before long we will have actuaries estimating how much of a social payment is necessary to give retirees who have been forced into early retired by ai a pension & badgering the politicians to legislate for both this & decent social payments before retirement. The current winter of discontent strikes look like nothing compared to what will have to be negotiated via such types of action.
Regards,
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 9th, 2023, 8:35 pm
by GrahamPlatt
odysseus2000 wrote:There is likely to be trouble at t’ai.
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 9th, 2023, 9:01 pm
by odysseus2000
GrahamPlatt wrote:odysseus2000 wrote:There is likely to be trouble at t’ai.
Thank you!
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 10th, 2023, 8:17 am
by Adamski
Microsoft reportedly adding ChatGPT to Bing.
MS owns LinkedIn, Skype and others. If integrates AI into Bing, Office apps, LinkedIn and rest. Could put it ahead of Google.
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 10th, 2023, 10:52 am
by servodude
Adamski wrote:Microsoft reportedly adding ChatGPT to Bing.
MS owns LinkedIn, Skype and others. If integrates AI into Bing, Office apps, LinkedIn and rest. Could put it ahead of Google.
Yeah!
If you want an "opinion engine" rather than a more traditional one for searching
I do like ChatGPT and I've used it a fair bit (sometimes with decent outcomes) and it is a wonder of Natural Language interpretation
- but it's a deceitful disingenuous Muppet at times
Fun though
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 11th, 2023, 5:28 pm
by MacroTrad
servodude wrote:Adamski wrote:Microsoft reportedly adding ChatGPT to Bing.
MS owns LinkedIn, Skype and others. If integrates AI into Bing, Office apps, LinkedIn and rest. Could put it ahead of Google.
Yeah!
If you want an "opinion engine" rather than a more traditional one for searching
I do like ChatGPT and I've used it a fair bit (sometimes with decent outcomes) and it is a wonder of Natural Language interpretation
- but it's a deceitful disingenuous Muppet at times
Fun though
I suspect an 'opinion engine' is exactly what some entities are going for.
Of course we better not say much around here because the virtue signalling opinion fascists will accuse everything that goes against the official narrative they parrot as being 'disinformation'.
Re: Chat GPT
Posted: January 11th, 2023, 5:43 pm
by XFool
MacroTrad wrote:I suspect an 'opinion engine' is exactly what some entities are going for.
Of course we better not say much around here because the virtue signalling opinion fascists will accuse everything that goes against the official narrative they parrot as being 'disinformation'.
You are a Spectator trained AI '
opinion engine' Bot and I claim my James O'Brien '
Woke Watch Badge'.
