Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva,scotia,Anonymous,Cornytiv34, for Donating to support the site

Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

Any other investment discussions eg. peer to peer lending
Itsallaguess
Lemon Half
Posts: 9129
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:16 pm
Has thanked: 4140 times
Been thanked: 10023 times

Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348564

Postby Itsallaguess » October 18th, 2020, 6:54 am

Interesting article this morning from the Guardian, highlighting the perils of P2P lending -

Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’ -

A saver who has been trying to get her money out of the UK’s biggest “peer-to-peer” (P2P) website since August has been told her request is 19,050th in the queue for withdrawals.

Michelle Johnson signed up with RateSetter in 2019 and invested a total of £1,000. After changes at the firm in the summer, she asked to withdraw her money – but months later she is still trying to get hold of the bulk of her cash.

“Please could you investigate what is going on at RateSetter?” she asked us this week. She told us she was in a queue of thousands of people to remove her money, adding: “I’m scared I’ll never see it again.”


https://www.theguardian.com/money/2020/oct/17/peer-to-peer-lending-savings-covid-pandemic

Cheers,

Itsallaguess

jackdaww
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2081
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:53 am
Has thanked: 3203 times
Been thanked: 417 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348571

Postby jackdaww » October 18th, 2020, 8:15 am

i have £103 in my account .

so i have requested to withdraw most of it .

i am in a queue - " Requests in front of you 23,159 " !!!!!!!!!

no indication of timescale to withdrawal being expedited .

lucky i dont need it urgently isnt it !

:roll:

ps.

confirmation email says ---

you should expect it to take over a month to complete from the date you made it.

perhaps by xmas then ??

langley59
Lemon Slice
Posts: 325
Joined: November 12th, 2016, 12:12 pm
Has thanked: 120 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348594

Postby langley59 » October 18th, 2020, 10:47 am

As I've posted before I'm in for tens of thousands on each of two platforms and not expecting much of it back soon on one (in a queue on Assetz) or indeed ever (bad loans at Thincats).

ReformedCharacter
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3120
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:12 am
Has thanked: 3590 times
Been thanked: 1509 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348598

Postby ReformedCharacter » October 18th, 2020, 11:14 am

I definitely dodged a bullet there. I had quite a substantial sum with RS but towards the end of last year thought that the lowering of rates and the risk involved made the investment undesirable. Little did I know...

RC

AsleepInYorkshire
Lemon Half
Posts: 7383
Joined: February 7th, 2017, 9:36 pm
Has thanked: 10514 times
Been thanked: 4659 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348601

Postby AsleepInYorkshire » October 18th, 2020, 11:25 am

I'm joining this conversation late and without a great deal of knowledge about this subject.

However, and with all humility is this a situation which could be categorised as "if it looks to good to be true, it probably is too good to be true". That's not a point scoring side swipe.

AiY

Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7084
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1637 times
Been thanked: 3791 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348607

Postby Mike4 » October 18th, 2020, 11:40 am

This strikes me as a non-story really.

The number of people ahead of you in the queue to withdraw seems irrelevant when the article doesn't say how many withdrawal requests they are completing each day, or what the terms of withdrawal were when she signed up. If the terms happened to say withdrawals require three months' notice, then what's the problem?

I suspect there is a problem though, and that more 'investors' are wanting their cash out than loans are being repaid, so the company has a cashflow problem. Even so, one would expect this to have been planned for by the company at the outset.

Edit to add:

In addition, as it is "peer to peer" lending, surely you can't get your cash back until the peer you lent it to re-pays it!

Stompa
Lemon Slice
Posts: 825
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:29 pm
Has thanked: 151 times
Been thanked: 208 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348611

Postby Stompa » October 18th, 2020, 11:57 am


Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7084
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1637 times
Been thanked: 3791 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348616

Postby Mike4 » October 18th, 2020, 12:03 pm

Has "peer to peer" lending lost its original meaning?

It seems to me that for lenders to be able to get their cash back, the peer they lent it to needs to repay.

If investors' cash is now all lumped together into one big pot (as it must be for investors to be able to withdraw on demand), then it is no longer peer to peer lending in the strict sense of the term.

swill453
Lemon Half
Posts: 7962
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 984 times
Been thanked: 3643 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348622

Postby swill453 » October 18th, 2020, 12:13 pm

Mike4 wrote:This strikes me as a non-story really.

The number of people ahead of you in the queue to withdraw seems irrelevant when the article doesn't say how many withdrawal requests they are completing each day, or what the terms of withdrawal were when she signed up. If the terms happened to say withdrawals require three months' notice, then what's the problem?

It does hint at the time expected to wait:

As of 8 October, her account showed that her “queue positions” for these two sums were 19,095 and 19,096 respectively. Six days later, on 14 October, she had moved up to 19,050 and 19,051. At that rate, it would take almost seven years for her to get to the front of the queue.

Scott.

chas49
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1935
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:25 am
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 457 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348625

Postby chas49 » October 18th, 2020, 12:21 pm

Mike4 wrote:Has "peer to peer" lending lost its original meaning?

It seems to me that for lenders to be able to get their cash back, the peer they lent it to needs to repay.

If investors' cash is now all lumped together into one big pot (as it must be for investors to be able to withdraw on demand), then it is no longer peer to peer lending in the strict sense of the term.


The terms of lending your money to Ratesetter are (broadly) that you can get it back when it's repaid (unless you reinvest it automatically), or ask for it back subject to the availability of someone else wanting to take on your loan. So it's either new investors wanting to put money into RS, or (more likely) people who are allowing their investments to roll-over as individual loans are repaid.

It is P2P in the sense that my money is lent out to other people, but if I invest (say) £1000 that isn't all lent to one person - it's split up amongst a whole load of borrowers so the risk is spread out..

Itsallaguess
Lemon Half
Posts: 9129
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:16 pm
Has thanked: 4140 times
Been thanked: 10023 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348635

Postby Itsallaguess » October 18th, 2020, 12:51 pm

chas49 wrote:
It is P2P in the sense that my money is lent out to other people, but if I invest (say) £1000 that isn't all lent to one person - it's split up amongst a whole load of borrowers so the risk is spread out..


That sounds a lot like Collateralized debt obligations (CDO's)...

In the early 2000s, the debt underpinning CDOs was generally diversified, but by 2006–2007—when the CDO market grew to hundreds of billions of dollars—this had changed. CDO collateral became dominated by high risk (BBB or A) tranches recycled from other asset-backed securities, whose assets were usually subprime mortgages. These CDOs have been called "the engine that powered the mortgage supply chain" for subprime mortgages, and are credited with giving lenders greater incentive to make subprime loans, leading to the 2007-2009 subprime mortgage crisis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collateralized_debt_obligation

Whilst I've not got the best of memories, I seem to recall things not ending too well regarding that whole 'Collateralized debt obligation' situation...

I've always had a real concern with the whole 'the risk is spread out' proposition regarding P2P lending, and whilst there's clearly times where improved investment rewards can be delivered by taking on more risk, the P2P side of things has always had a very strong smell associated with it from my point of view, and the Guardian story linked in my opening post suggests that those smells are not just imagined...

Cheers,

Itsallaguess

johnhemming
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3858
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:13 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348653

Postby johnhemming » October 18th, 2020, 1:55 pm

I did a bit of peer to peer, but it all looked a little uncontrollable to me. The problem is that in essence you are relying on the central organisation as to be effective at managing the loan finance. I do a small amount of commercial private lending. That I am a lot happier with as I know what is going on and am in control of the situation.

In many ways a good route for P2P would be more to introduce lenders to borrowers, but without standing in the middle as an intermediary for the loan. Otherwise it is really quite a bit more speculative than the secondary market.

RockRabbit
Lemon Slice
Posts: 405
Joined: December 31st, 2019, 9:10 am
Has thanked: 1275 times
Been thanked: 361 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348655

Postby RockRabbit » October 18th, 2020, 2:08 pm

I'm with RS and put my withdrawal request in during March - I'm still in the queue. The queue only appears to reduce by a few dozen a week so if you are 19,050 you might have quite a wait.

jackdaww
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2081
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:53 am
Has thanked: 3203 times
Been thanked: 417 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348689

Postby jackdaww » October 18th, 2020, 4:09 pm

RockRabbit wrote:I'm with RS and put my withdrawal request in during March - I'm still in the queue. The queue only appears to reduce by a few dozen a week so if you are 19,050 you might have quite a wait.


=====================

so when they say i will have a months wait , that is a porky ??

:?

kempiejon
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3488
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 10:30 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1145 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348696

Postby kempiejon » October 18th, 2020, 4:39 pm

RockRabbit wrote:I'm with RS and put my withdrawal request in during March - I'm still in the queue. The queue only appears to reduce by a few dozen a week so if you are 19,050 you might have quite a wait.


I'm trying to get out of RS too, I've been watching the numbers and concur with about 100 per month, so with 19050 it'll be ages, I've been on the list since April, I am having regular returns as I was investing monthly and I'm down to my last hundred on loan.

Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7084
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1637 times
Been thanked: 3791 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348699

Postby Mike4 » October 18th, 2020, 4:43 pm

kempiejon wrote:I'm trying to get out of RS too, I've been watching the numbers and concur with about 100 per month, so with 19050 it'll be ages


Best part of 16 years actually, at that rate.

DrBunsenHoneydew
Lemon Slice
Posts: 555
Joined: November 10th, 2016, 10:04 am
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 158 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#348921

Postby DrBunsenHoneydew » October 19th, 2020, 12:17 pm

I joined ZOPA as a P2P lender in 2007, and added to my account for 3 years.
Exactly 10 years ago I got fed up with the high rates of bad debts and pressed the button to withdraw all my funds as quickly as possible.
I am still receiving periodic payments, albeit pennies per year now.
This is because loans that fell into default (but not to the extent of being written off completely) have been given extended time to repay the borrowed capital. I can see that taking "for ever", certainly metaphorically, but possibly literally, and being a nuisance for my executors.
It's a nightmare - please make it stop!

Nocton
Lemon Slice
Posts: 491
Joined: November 6th, 2016, 11:25 am
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#349098

Postby Nocton » October 20th, 2020, 8:42 am

I've been with Ratesetter for years and have no worries about my money. I think that they have behaved very responsibly this year, halving interest rates for 6 months to allow the reserve fund to build up in preparation for a likely higher level of non-repayment than previous years. But still delivering a useful rate of interest, unlike NS and most BSs.
Mike4 wrote:Has "peer to peer" lending lost its original meaning? It seems to me that for lenders to be able to get their cash back, the peer they lent it to needs to repay.
If investors' cash is now all lumped together into one big pot (as it must be for investors to be able to withdraw on demand), then it is no longer peer to peer lending in the strict sense of the term.

Strictly speaking Mike4 you are correct and that makes it, at least the way RS operates, a much less risky investment than some true PtoPs. I put the level of risk somewhere between a building society and a FT100 bond.

When I look a the data on https://www.ratesetter.com/investment-release-requests some of the figures on queue position look odd, and as Mike4 also says, rather meaningless.

RS is very transparent and open about the current Covid-19 'problem' the full statistics are here: https://www.ratesetter.com/invest/statistics There is a lot of info, but he key ones for the current discussion are:
Interest Rate cover (before temp interest reduction) 69%
Capital Coverage Ratio (to cover expected future defaults) 153%

Gan020
Lemon Slice
Posts: 461
Joined: March 3rd, 2019, 12:25 pm
Has thanked: 178 times
Been thanked: 246 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#349142

Postby Gan020 » October 20th, 2020, 10:20 am

I find the interest rate cover and capital coverage ratios misleading because the values include future flows into the provision fund which have not happenned yet.

And since the future flows into the fund are almost double the current provision it skews the calculation badly.

The current bad debt provision is £7.2m compared with an lending book of £4,031m = 0.18%. Scary. I can see why they've cut rates and plan to build it up. Even at the target though of £23.4m that's still only 0.58%.


Also, it's interesting to note with a loan book of £4,031m and 87,000 investors that implies an average exposure of £46k per investor.

Um and with 692,000 borrowers that implies over 1% of the population has borrowed from ratesetter. Of course I can't really do it that way as many will be businesses but even so that's quite striking but there again my 1% includes children under the age of 18 etc.

dspp
Lemon Half
Posts: 5884
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:53 am
Has thanked: 5825 times
Been thanked: 2127 times

Re: Peer-to-peer lending: ‘I’m 19,050th in the queue to get my savings back’

#349637

Postby dspp » October 21st, 2020, 6:33 pm

Itsallaguess wrote:Interesting article this morning from the Guardian, highlighting the perils of P2P lending -


Moderator Message:
Thread relocated to correct board following alert, regards, dspp


Return to “Other Investing”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests