simoan wrote:Lootman wrote:For you perhaps, if that is the type of mind you have. But various studies have shown that getting your high-level asset allocation correct is more important for risk-adjusted returns than bottom-up stock-picking. And that allocation process consists of getting an optimal balance of stocks, bonds, gold etc., and then a geographic overlay.
You’re confusing two things here. Asset allocation is absolutely imperative to risk adjusted returns. Blindly spreading your investments geographically and introducing currency risk, is not. You should own good companies wherever they are located, if that is what you call “bottom up stick picking” then so be it, but it as after all the original ethos of this place.
I'd agree that one's geographic allocations does not have to be "blind". You may choose to use an allocation that works differently from market cap. And I see different parts of the world differently, which might just be my bias. So for example I prefer North America and Asia to Europe or the UK. I mostly avoid China but over-weight India. And so on.
As an aside I do not consider currency risk when it comes to equities. My approach is that it all cancels out in the long run. I would consider currency if I were a bond investor, but I am not. i am happy to have a low exposure to sterling.