Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva, for Donating to support the site

James Webb Telescope

Scientific discovery and discussion
MrFoolish
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2339
Joined: March 22nd, 2020, 7:27 pm
Has thanked: 566 times
Been thanked: 1145 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468523

Postby MrFoolish » December 26th, 2021, 7:35 am

NotSure wrote:It is apparently sensitive enough to detect a candle on one of Jupiter's moons!

https://www.ralspace.stfc.ac.uk/Pages/First-instrument-for-the-JWST-is-completed-and-handed-over-to-NASA.aspx


Which moon is it on?

Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7180
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1658 times
Been thanked: 3815 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468555

Postby Mike4 » December 26th, 2021, 12:20 pm

MrFoolish wrote:
NotSure wrote:It is apparently sensitive enough to detect a candle on one of Jupiter's moons!

https://www.ralspace.stfc.ac.uk/Pages/First-instrument-for-the-JWST-is-completed-and-handed-over-to-NASA.aspx


Which moon is it on?


I'm more concerned about who put it there!

scrumpyjack
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4850
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:15 am
Has thanked: 614 times
Been thanked: 2702 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468556

Postby scrumpyjack » December 26th, 2021, 12:26 pm

Is it alight?

kiloran
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4111
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:24 am
Has thanked: 3244 times
Been thanked: 2850 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468557

Postby kiloran » December 26th, 2021, 12:30 pm

Mike4 wrote:
MrFoolish wrote:
NotSure wrote:It is apparently sensitive enough to detect a candle on one of Jupiter's moons!

https://www.ralspace.stfc.ac.uk/Pages/First-instrument-for-the-JWST-is-completed-and-handed-over-to-NASA.aspx


Which moon is it on?


I'm more concerned about who put it there!

[Spartacus]
I put the candle on the moon
[/Spartacus]

--kiloran

NotSure
Lemon Slice
Posts: 916
Joined: February 5th, 2021, 4:45 pm
Has thanked: 681 times
Been thanked: 314 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468569

Postby NotSure » December 26th, 2021, 2:11 pm

MrFoolish wrote:
NotSure wrote:It is apparently sensitive enough to detect a candle on one of Jupiter's moons!

https://www.ralspace.stfc.ac.uk/Pages/First-instrument-for-the-JWST-is-completed-and-handed-over-to-NASA.aspx


Which moon is it on?


I've no idea (and I suspect your question is rhetorical anyway), but, I ran some quick numbers to see if this claim was even remotely plausible (E&OE).

Using round numbers throughout for an 'order or magnitude' estimate, a candle outputs around 100 W. If we assume (for simplicity) that all the power is concentrated the middle of the JW IR band, i.e. at 10 microns, that is around 1e22 photons/s.

Applying the inverse square law, with Jupiter around 600 million km away, and the JW dish of diameter 6.5 m, I make it that 2 or 3 photons/minute could be captured by the JW. So just about plausible with a long exposure and an extremely high SNR?

ursaminortaur
Lemon Half
Posts: 7038
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:26 pm
Has thanked: 456 times
Been thanked: 1746 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468610

Postby ursaminortaur » December 26th, 2021, 10:59 pm

scrumpyjack wrote:Is it alight?


If it is then something must be providing a fairly high concentration of oxygen in its vicinity.

vrdiver
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2574
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 2:22 am
Has thanked: 552 times
Been thanked: 1212 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468624

Postby vrdiver » December 27th, 2021, 8:34 am

If we've already spotted that there's a candle on one of Jupiter's moons, why have we wasted $10b on a telescope that can, at a pinch, do the same thing?

VRD

GrahamPlatt
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2077
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:40 am
Has thanked: 1039 times
Been thanked: 840 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468641

Postby GrahamPlatt » December 27th, 2021, 10:45 am

NotSure wrote:Using round numbers throughout for an 'order or magnitude' estimate, a candle outputs around 100 W.


Where do you buy your candles?

kiloran
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4111
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:24 am
Has thanked: 3244 times
Been thanked: 2850 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468643

Postby kiloran » December 27th, 2021, 11:06 am

GrahamPlatt wrote:
NotSure wrote:Using round numbers throughout for an 'order or magnitude' estimate, a candle outputs around 100 W.


Where do you buy your candles?

One of these?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_Candle_of_the_World

Or https://sillyamerica.com/blog/worlds-la ... e-indiana/

--kiloran

NotSure
Lemon Slice
Posts: 916
Joined: February 5th, 2021, 4:45 pm
Has thanked: 681 times
Been thanked: 314 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468648

Postby NotSure » December 27th, 2021, 12:06 pm

GrahamPlatt wrote:
NotSure wrote:Using round numbers throughout for an 'order or magnitude' estimate, a candle outputs around 100 W.


Where do you buy your candles?


:)

Unfortunately for our ancestors, but luckily for the JW, nearly all of those Watts are emitted in the infra-red. The standard number used for a candle seem to be 80 W (about 2 mg of fuel/second), so about 25 candles should be capable of boiling a kettle.

In visible terms, more like 50 mW - they are apparently about 0.05% efficienct.

jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2562
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1104 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468679

Postby jfgw » December 27th, 2021, 4:07 pm

GrahamPlatt wrote:
NotSure wrote:Using round numbers throughout for an 'order or magnitude' estimate, a candle outputs around 100 W.


Where do you buy your candles?


A standard British candle was made from spermaceti from sperm whales and emitted about 80W. The French were ahead of the game with a vegan alternative.

I didn't realise that Jupiter had so many moons — 79 discovered as of this 2018 article, https://carnegiescience.edu/news/dozen-new-moons-jupiter-discovered-including-one-%E2%80%9Coddball%E2%80%9D. Io has an atmosphere of, mostly, sulphur dioxide. I don't know about the other moons. It may be possible to formulate a candle that will burn in such an atmosphere (I am not a chemist). Combustion can occur without oxygen, for example, lithium will burn in nitrogen.

I am opening a book as to which the telescope will find first:
4/5 the candle;
1/1 the teapot.


Julian F. G. W.

Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7180
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1658 times
Been thanked: 3815 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468685

Postby Mike4 » December 27th, 2021, 4:31 pm

jfgw wrote:
GrahamPlatt wrote:
NotSure wrote:Using round numbers throughout for an 'order or magnitude' estimate, a candle outputs around 100 W.


Where do you buy your candles?


A standard British candle was made from spermaceti from sperm whales and emitted about 80W. The French were ahead of the game with a vegan alternative.

I didn't realise that Jupiter had so many moons — 79 discovered as of this 2018 article, https://carnegiescience.edu/news/dozen-new-moons-jupiter-discovered-including-one-%E2%80%9Coddball%E2%80%9D. Io has an atmosphere of, mostly, sulphur dioxide. I don't know about the other moons. It may be possible to formulate a candle that will burn in such an atmosphere (I am not a chemist). Combustion can occur without oxygen, for example, lithium will burn in nitrogen.

I am opening a book as to which the telescope will find first:
4/5 the candle;
1/1 the teapot.


Julian F. G. W.


Shouldn't the sperm whale and a bowl of petunias be on your list too?

MrFoolish
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2339
Joined: March 22nd, 2020, 7:27 pm
Has thanked: 566 times
Been thanked: 1145 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468687

Postby MrFoolish » December 27th, 2021, 4:37 pm

jfgw wrote:I am opening a book as to which the telescope will find first:
4/5 the candle;
1/1 the teapot


More likely a McDonalds drink cup, on the basis they turn up in litter everywhere.

pje16
Lemon Half
Posts: 6050
Joined: May 30th, 2021, 6:01 pm
Has thanked: 1843 times
Been thanked: 2067 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468689

Postby pje16 » December 27th, 2021, 4:48 pm

Let's hope they find 1, 2, 3 or 5 candles
but not 4 :lol:
Sorry... I couldn't help myself :oops:

jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2562
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1104 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468693

Postby jfgw » December 27th, 2021, 5:02 pm

MrFoolish wrote:
jfgw wrote:I am opening a book as to which the telescope will find first:
4/5 the candle;
1/1 the teapot


More likely a McDonalds drink cup, on the basis they turn up in litter everywhere.


It wouldn't surprise be if they had a branch on one of Jupiter's moons.


Julian F. G. W.

scrumpyjack
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4850
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:15 am
Has thanked: 614 times
Been thanked: 2702 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468702

Postby scrumpyjack » December 27th, 2021, 5:34 pm

jfgw wrote:
MrFoolish wrote:
jfgw wrote:I am opening a book as to which the telescope will find first:
4/5 the candle;
1/1 the teapot


More likely a McDonalds drink cup, on the basis they turn up in litter everywhere.


It wouldn't surprise be if they had a branch on one of Jupiter's moons.


Julian F. G. W.


Ir should be able to spot Bertrand Russell's teapot which is orbiting somewhere between earth and mars

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

9873210
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1011
Joined: December 9th, 2016, 6:44 am
Has thanked: 232 times
Been thanked: 307 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468718

Postby 9873210 » December 27th, 2021, 7:39 pm

NotSure wrote:
MrFoolish wrote:
NotSure wrote:It is apparently sensitive enough to detect a candle on one of Jupiter's moons!

https://www.ralspace.stfc.ac.uk/Pages/First-instrument-for-the-JWST-is-completed-and-handed-over-to-NASA.aspx


Which moon is it on?


I've no idea (and I suspect your question is rhetorical anyway), but, I ran some quick numbers to see if this claim was even remotely plausible (E&OE).

Using round numbers throughout for an 'order or magnitude' estimate, a candle outputs around 100 W. If we assume (for simplicity) that all the power is concentrated the middle of the JW IR band, i.e. at 10 microns, that is around 1e22 photons/s.

Applying the inverse square law, with Jupiter around 600 million km away, and the JW dish of diameter 6.5 m, I make it that 2 or 3 photons/minute could be captured by the JW. So just about plausible with a long exposure and an extremely high SNR?


The original quote is an overstatement. Webb might detect a candle against a dark background at the distance of Jupiter. It could not resolve a candle on a sunlit Jovian moon. This would be a harder problem than discriminating extra-solar planets near a star.

magnitude of the sun (at 1 AU) -27.
magnitude of Earth (at 1 AU) -4.
Difference 23.

Apparent magnitude of Galilean moons 5
Apparent magnitude of one candela at 6E8km 41
Difference 36.

(I've done some rounding and a lot of simplification but with a difference of 13 magnitudes a factor of 2 or 10,000 hardly matters).

NotSure
Lemon Slice
Posts: 916
Joined: February 5th, 2021, 4:45 pm
Has thanked: 681 times
Been thanked: 314 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468723

Postby NotSure » December 27th, 2021, 8:34 pm

9873210 wrote:The original quote is an overstatement. Webb might detect a candle against a dark background at the distance of Jupiter. It could not resolve a candle on a sunlit Jovian moon......


Party pooper :lol: Of couse you'd only try at night! ;)

Next you'll be pointing out that the candle would be cold anyway as there's no oxygen on Europa (at least not in gaseous form).....

9873210
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1011
Joined: December 9th, 2016, 6:44 am
Has thanked: 232 times
Been thanked: 307 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468726

Postby 9873210 » December 27th, 2021, 9:17 pm

NotSure wrote:
9873210 wrote:The original quote is an overstatement. Webb might detect a candle against a dark background at the distance of Jupiter. It could not resolve a candle on a sunlit Jovian moon......


Party pooper :lol: Of couse you'd only try at night! ;)

Next you'll be pointing out that the candle would be cold anyway as there's no oxygen on Europa (at least not in gaseous form).....


If that poops your party you need more rocket fuel.

Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7180
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1658 times
Been thanked: 3815 times

Re: James Webb Telescope

#468738

Postby Mike4 » December 27th, 2021, 11:13 pm

NotSure wrote:
9873210 wrote:The original quote is an overstatement. Webb might detect a candle against a dark background at the distance of Jupiter. It could not resolve a candle on a sunlit Jovian moon......


Party pooper :lol: Of couse you'd only try at night! ;)

Next you'll be pointing out that the candle would be cold anyway as there's no oxygen on Europa (at least not in gaseous form).....


It was probably one of them electric candles, like what Ray Davies sang about in his song "Lola". I guess it would have to be actually, given the oxygen problem.

Hope that helps....


Return to “Science”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests