Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77, for Donating to support the site

Geothermal Energy

Scientific discovery and discussion
PhaseThree

Geothermal Energy

#484558

Postby PhaseThree » March 5th, 2022, 5:02 pm

I came across this article today detailing a new take on Geothermal Energy drilling and production from an MIT spin-off.

https://newatlas.com/energy/quaise-deep ... ave-drill/

It would be ironic if the biggest thing to come out of decades of fusion research is a new drilling technique for geothermal. The re-purposing of coal fired power station is also an interesting possibility.

They have just raised $40 million in A-series funding to further develop the idea.
Definitely worth keeping an eye on

Company web page here
https://www.quaise.energy/

1nvest
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4446
Joined: May 31st, 2019, 7:55 pm
Has thanked: 696 times
Been thanked: 1360 times

Re: Geothermal Energy

#484659

Postby 1nvest » March 6th, 2022, 10:49 am

If the earths core is cooled quicker then the planet (mankind) die sooner, without the magma swirling around we lose the magnetic field that protects us ???

PhaseThree

Re: Geothermal Energy

#484674

Postby PhaseThree » March 6th, 2022, 11:24 am

1nvest wrote:If the earths core is cooled quicker then the planet (mankind) die sooner, without the magma swirling around we lose the magnetic field that protects us ???


From the article :-
"Where there's access to heat, there's harvestable geothermal energy. And there's so much heat below the Earth's surface, according to Paul Woskov, a senior fusion research engineer at MIT, that tapping just 0.1 percent of it could supply the entire world's energy needs for more than 20 million years."

I think 20 Million years is a reasonable timescale to look for an alternative solution. We might even have worked out how to get fusion to work by then.

mc2fool
Lemon Half
Posts: 7893
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 3051 times

Re: Geothermal Energy

#484707

Postby mc2fool » March 6th, 2022, 1:51 pm

Seems Quaise are not the only ones:

"AltaRock Energy is leading an effort to melt and vaporize rocks with millimeter waves. Instead of grinding away with mechanical drills, scientists use a gyrotron — a specialized high-frequency microwave-beam generator — to open holes in slabs of hard rock." https://spectrum.ieee.org/altarock-energy-melts-rock-with-millimeter-waves-for-geothermal-wells

Sounds like The Core. :D

AltaRock Energy though have an order of magnitude difference on the energy available ... "AltaRock estimates that just 0.1 percent of the planet's heat content could supply humanity's total energy needs for 2 million years." Bah! Only 2 million! :o

The article goes on to call Quaise "an affiliate of AltaRock" but it's not clear what that means.

And then there's https://www.gadrilling.com/, which uses a different technology but is also going for the same end goal, Geothermal Anywhere.

And also https://www.eavor.com who have a good video explaining the different types of geothermal power and, of course, why theirs is better. ;) https://youtu.be/PtQmGPmyLA0 (12 minutes)

Text & pictures explanation of the Four basic types of geothermal energy technology at https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2020/10/21/21515461/renewable-energy-geothermal-egs-ags-supercritical

Ok, I'm convinced ... will be selling up my wind & solar ITs as soon as a geothermal one launches....

scotia
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3566
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 2376 times
Been thanked: 1947 times

Re: Geothermal Energy

#485215

Postby scotia » March 8th, 2022, 6:30 pm

And how about drilling into the magma chamber below a volcano - as has been proposed in Iceland
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iceland-energy-britain-idUSKBN17C17E
And constructing an under water power cable to the UK.

An Iceland-UK power cable to transfer geothermal-generated electricity has been proposed for decades - but never seems to get off the ground.
The following Wiki link suggests that it may be unlikely to happen any time soon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icelink

PhaseThree

Re: Geothermal Energy

#485218

Postby PhaseThree » March 8th, 2022, 6:48 pm

scotia wrote:And how about drilling into the magma chamber below a volcano - as has been proposed in Iceland
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iceland-energy-britain-idUSKBN17C17E
And constructing an under water power cable to the UK.

An Iceland-UK power cable to transfer geothermal-generated electricity has been proposed for decades - but never seems to get off the ground.
The following Wiki link suggests that it may be unlikely to happen any time soon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icelink


That's one of the questions that comes up in this QA session with the CEO of Quaise. Volcanos are typically too far from the places that need the energy and building serious distribution is expensive.

https://newatlas.com/energy/quaise-deep ... questions/

mc2fool
Lemon Half
Posts: 7893
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 3051 times

Re: Geothermal Energy

#485223

Postby mc2fool » March 8th, 2022, 7:27 pm

PhaseThree wrote:
scotia wrote:And how about drilling into the magma chamber below a volcano - as has been proposed in Iceland
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iceland-energy-britain-idUSKBN17C17E
And constructing an under water power cable to the UK.

An Iceland-UK power cable to transfer geothermal-generated electricity has been proposed for decades - but never seems to get off the ground.
The following Wiki link suggests that it may be unlikely to happen any time soon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icelink

That's one of the questions that comes up in this QA session with the CEO of Quaise. Volcanos are typically too far from the places that need the energy and building serious distribution is expensive.

https://newatlas.com/energy/quaise-deep ... questions/

Some interesting questions in the Q&A ...

"Couldn't you just drill into the side of a volcano instead?
Yes, but most humans do not live near one. This is a solution that can work for 95 percent of humanity.

Isn't that how planet Krypton was destroyed?
No, an explosion destroyed Krypton.

Could this unleash the lizard people that inhabit the inner sphere?
How do we know they did not already drill up using this technology and are already amongst us?

Will you be renting out the megawatt-class energy weapon between projects? One user wants to keep it in the car for when people cut him off on the freeway.
No.

Will this wake up the Kaiju?
No.
"

:D

ursaminortaur
Lemon Half
Posts: 7073
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:26 pm
Has thanked: 456 times
Been thanked: 1761 times

Re: Geothermal Energy

#485390

Postby ursaminortaur » March 9th, 2022, 12:49 pm

mc2fool wrote:
PhaseThree wrote:
scotia wrote:And how about drilling into the magma chamber below a volcano - as has been proposed in Iceland
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iceland-energy-britain-idUSKBN17C17E
And constructing an under water power cable to the UK.

An Iceland-UK power cable to transfer geothermal-generated electricity has been proposed for decades - but never seems to get off the ground.
The following Wiki link suggests that it may be unlikely to happen any time soon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icelink

That's one of the questions that comes up in this QA session with the CEO of Quaise. Volcanos are typically too far from the places that need the energy and building serious distribution is expensive.

https://newatlas.com/energy/quaise-deep ... questions/

Some interesting questions in the Q&A ...

"[i]Couldn't you just drill into the side of a volcano instead?
Yes, but most humans do not live near one. This is a solution that can work for 95 percent of humanity.


There are though pretty big populations close to quite a number of volcanoes as the soil close to them is particularly fertile and has therefore historically attracted farmers to the region which then led to the build up of nearby cities and towns eg Vesuvius.

PhaseThree

Re: Geothermal Energy

#485462

Postby PhaseThree » March 9th, 2022, 6:59 pm

ursaminortaur wrote:There are though pretty big populations close to quite a number of volcanoes as the soil close to them is particularly fertile and has therefore historically attracted farmers to the region which then led to the build up of nearby cities and towns eg Vesuvius.


According to Google around 8% of the world population live within a 100km radius of a "recently" active volcano, largely in/on the Ring of Fire. I can see the attraction of drilling local boreholes rather than tapping distant volcanos if the technology makes it cost-effective.

Gerry557
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2049
Joined: September 2nd, 2019, 10:23 am
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 563 times

Re: Geothermal Energy

#485522

Postby Gerry557 » March 10th, 2022, 8:23 am

Wot appends when....

All this drilling causes the core to cool

Bruce Willis is getting on a bit to be saving our [expletive deleted] yet again.

GrahamPlatt
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2087
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:40 am
Has thanked: 1041 times
Been thanked: 842 times

Re: Geothermal Energy

#485525

Postby GrahamPlatt » March 10th, 2022, 8:40 am

I'd want to see the technology to "cap" a gusher proven first. Drilling into the magma chamber (especially e.g. Yellowstone) sounds a bit hazardous.

PhaseThree

Re: Geothermal Energy

#485592

Postby PhaseThree » March 10th, 2022, 1:13 pm

Meanwhile and closer to home geothermal drilling in Cornwall causes an "earthquake". (Not sure that a 1.6 magnitude shake actually qualifies as an earthquake).

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... lling.html

mc2fool
Lemon Half
Posts: 7893
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 3051 times

Re: Geothermal Energy

#485605

Postby mc2fool » March 10th, 2022, 1:59 pm

PhaseThree wrote:Meanwhile and closer to home geothermal drilling in Cornwall causes an "earthquake". (Not sure that a 1.6 magnitude shake actually qualifies as an earthquake).

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... lling.html

Hmmm ... this seems to be an Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS), the "fracking" type of geothermal. The project's website is at https://www.edengeothermal.com and there's a 5 minute video on the home page explaining what they're doing.

Their news page contains an item on the reported "earthquake" which starts:

"Felt seismicity – update

UPDATE AT 12:55 ON 1OTH MARCH 2022

The seismic event which occurred at approximately 9.20pm on 9th March was induced by injection testing at Eden Geothermal. These tests have been ongoing since late January and have involved injecting fresh water into the natural fractures near the bottom of the well.

Injection testing induces low level seismic events (microseismicity). Since the start of testing there have been over 300 low level seismic events. However, the event that occurred at 9:20 pm yesterday evening was heard and felt by people in the local community. It was 1.7 Magnitude at a depth of over 3,700 metres.
:
:
"

https://www.edengeothermal.com/2022/03/10/felt-seismicity-update/

The item includes a link to a page about "microseismicity" including a video.

GrahamPlatt
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2087
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:40 am
Has thanked: 1041 times
Been thanked: 842 times

Re: Geothermal Energy

#485661

Postby GrahamPlatt » March 10th, 2022, 6:06 pm

mc2fool wrote:Their news page contains an item on the reported "earthquake" which starts:

"Felt seismicity – update



"Seismicity"? That's a word now is it?

mc2fool
Lemon Half
Posts: 7893
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:24 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 3051 times

Re: Geothermal Energy

#485662

Postby mc2fool » March 10th, 2022, 6:14 pm

GrahamPlatt wrote:
mc2fool wrote:Their news page contains an item on the reported "earthquake" which starts:

"Felt seismicity – update



"Seismicity"? That's a word now is it?

Yes, a new one on me too, but apparently it has been for a long time (not sure why the peak usage in 1984 though :?) https://www.google.com/search?q=Seismicity+definition

jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2564
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1107 times
Been thanked: 1166 times

Re: Geothermal Energy

#485670

Postby jfgw » March 10th, 2022, 6:34 pm

PhaseThree wrote:I think 20 Million years is a reasonable timescale to look for an alternative solution. We might even have worked out how to get fusion to work by then.


Nah, it will be another 30 years.


Julian F. G. W.


Return to “Science”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests