XFool wrote:
I have this 'theory' - let's call it the XFool Effect
A modern-day phenomenon that we can all regularly experience and agree on without the need for sophisticated sensors...
Cheers,
Itsallaguess
Thanks to jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh, for Donating to support the site
XFool wrote:
I have this 'theory' - let's call it the XFool Effect
odysseus2000 wrote:
All the early reports might have been hoax, but if so most of the military all over the world spent a fortune investigating hoax and writing reports.
A lot of the analysis looks like deliberate misinformation designed to sow doubt and uncertainty into as many minds as possible.
If this is true what are they trying to hide?
Itsallaguess wrote:odysseus2000 wrote:
All the early reports might have been hoax, but if so most of the military all over the world spent a fortune investigating hoax and writing reports.
A lot of the analysis looks like deliberate misinformation designed to sow doubt and uncertainty into as many minds as possible.
If this is true what are they trying to hide?
Are we properly able to tell the difference between 'investigating a hoax' and 'investigating the possibility of enhanced human-enemy military capability'?
I suspect not, and I also suspect that the inability to do so is one of the primary reasons for the ongoing proliferation of UFO-based conspiracy theories...
Cheers,
Itsallaguess
odysseus2000 wrote:The research into uap goes back over 70 years.
Is it reasonable to assume that all the world’s powers with satellite imagery etc could not determine if uap were the product of one country. Would be in those 70 years it not have been possible to establish bases for hostile military programs, infiltrate them & know who & what was being done. The secrets of nuclear weapons spread around the powerful nations, but uap, if a human program made by one nation or several nations did not?
None of this is very plausible.
XFool wrote:odysseus2000 wrote:The research into uap goes back over 70 years.
Is it reasonable to assume that all the world’s powers with satellite imagery etc could not determine if uap were the product of one country. Would be in those 70 years it not have been possible to establish bases for hostile military programs, infiltrate them & know who & what was being done. The secrets of nuclear weapons spread around the powerful nations, but uap, if a human program made by one nation or several nations did not?
None of this is very plausible.
odysseus2000, you seem to me still to be wedded to the idea that there must a single, central cause - whatever it may be - for UAPs. I see no real reason to assume that. Perhaps sweeping them all up under a single name, particularly one like UFOs, has biased our thinking into falsely believing there is a single cause for them? This has the apparent virtue of simplicity, but may be misleading.
I suspect it is otherwise; that it may be a mixture of several different things: both in the phenomena and the perception.
mc2fool wrote:Unexplained aerial phenomenon defying all known laws of physics witnessed by thousands and filmed close up in HD!
https://youtu.be/F4v0BZtrSbY?t=270
XFool wrote:...What's in the small bag he's wearing round his waist?
XFool wrote:...What's in the small bag he's wearing round his waist?
XFool wrote:Can anyone explain the bike?
I think I can, though I haven't seen the start of his act, only what is in the video.
XFool wrote:Can anyone explain the bike?
I think I can, though I haven't seen the start of his act, only what is in the video.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests