scotia wrote:odysseus2000 wrote: The US is supplying military hardware via lend lease, as they did to the uk in the second war, creating huge amounts of debt for Ukraine. It took the uk 70 years to pay off US lend lease
Regards,
On lease-lend (from the US to the UK), from Wiki:-
Materiel delivered under the act was supplied at no cost, to be used until returned or destroyed. In practice, most equipment was destroyed, although some hardware (such as ships) was returned after the war. (although not really relevant to the Indian Moon shot)
How super interesting. Clearly I had this wrong and the ex CIA on the Lex Fridman podcast (28 mins 50) to 30 mins also has this wrong:
https://youtu.be/T3FC7qIAGZk?si=lBRO5UEikYUy8myOHe also says the UK did not repay lend lease till 2020 whereas the last payment seems to have been 2006 and was not for lend lease, but for debt taken on after the war. However, it is, as so often, complicated as although the UK does not appear to have repaid lend lease for the war, the UK did give technical information such as Radar, Jet engines, Tube-Alloy (UK nuclear bomb research), some rights to Caribbean islands and various other odds and sods of potentially great value to the US. Russia only repaid a fraction of its lend lease debt, the rest was cancelled, but again Russia did send minerals and gold. So assuming that wiki and other sources can be relied upon, Ukraine will likely be forgiven its lend lease debt, but may feel obliged to use US contractors etc for re-building.
Another take on the Ukraine lend/lease is here, that is more like what the ex-CIA said:
https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/ukr ... ase-myths/If this can be believed the US has spent $115b on Ukraine:
https://usafacts.org/articles/how-much- ... -invasion/By comparison Nasa in 2023 will receive $23b
The Indian landing on the moon cost $75 million:
https://www.zawya.com/en/world/indian-s ... -q3sxwaun#Regards,