Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva,scotia,Anonymous,Cornytiv34, for Donating to support the site

Wood-burning pollution

Fitness tips, Relaxation, Mind and Body
kiloran
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4092
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:24 am
Has thanked: 3234 times
Been thanked: 2827 times

Wood-burning pollution

#387329

Postby kiloran » February 16th, 2021, 11:59 pm

I knew that wood-burning stoves create particle pollution, but never realised the scale of it
Fires used by just 8% of population but cause triple the particle pollution of traffic, data shows

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... tion-fires

--kiloran (not a wood burner)

GoSeigen
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4349
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:14 pm
Has thanked: 1590 times
Been thanked: 1579 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387337

Postby GoSeigen » February 17th, 2021, 6:08 am

kiloran wrote:I knew that wood-burning stoves create particle pollution, but never realised the scale of it
Fires used by just 8% of population but cause triple the particle pollution of traffic, data shows

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... tion-fires

--kiloran (not a wood burner)


I think a major factor behind the growth of wood burning not mentioned in the article is the marketing of modern stoves as more efficient than older devices and open fires. People feel like they are doing less damage in terms of CO2 production than previously and thus feel quite good about using a stove. Certainly was a big factor in our choice to use one in the rented properties we've occupied which were already fitted with them. It didn't occur to me that the levels of pollution produced were bad enough to negate the advantages, certainly there were few voices pushing that angle.


GS (wood burner, currently open fireplace, previously stoves)

GrahamPlatt
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2059
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:40 am
Has thanked: 1032 times
Been thanked: 823 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387351

Postby GrahamPlatt » February 17th, 2021, 7:45 am


Dod101
The full Lemon
Posts: 16629
Joined: October 10th, 2017, 11:33 am
Has thanked: 4343 times
Been thanked: 7534 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387402

Postby Dod101 » February 17th, 2021, 10:30 am

I have a big woodburning stove and when the weather is as it has been for the last six weeks I have needed it. I use kiln dried logs which are supposed to burn more cleanly in every sense. As well as hopefully less pollution, they also do less harm to the chimney, but they are expensive. Currently I guess it is cheaper to use oil more, but of course there was time when, with the oil price going through the roof, it was the other way round.

However they are dirty or at least dusty to burn as I note only too well and what it is doing to my lungs.......

Dod

GrahamPlatt
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2059
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:40 am
Has thanked: 1032 times
Been thanked: 823 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387404

Postby GrahamPlatt » February 17th, 2021, 10:37 am

I was wondering if pellet burners might be better... yes but: https://woodsmokepollution.org/pellet-stoves.html

Dod101
The full Lemon
Posts: 16629
Joined: October 10th, 2017, 11:33 am
Has thanked: 4343 times
Been thanked: 7534 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387411

Postby Dod101 » February 17th, 2021, 10:59 am

GrahamPlatt wrote:I was wondering if pellet burners might be better... yes but: https://woodsmokepollution.org/pellet-stoves.html


That article is not very encouraging is it? My answer would be to upgrade the insulation I guess. Might be interesting to get someone to take a look. Who would do that sort of thing?

Dod

anon155742
Lemon Slice
Posts: 260
Joined: June 13th, 2019, 8:56 pm
Has thanked: 891 times
Been thanked: 160 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387455

Postby anon155742 » February 17th, 2021, 12:58 pm

I wonder how many PM2.5 particles are made when they cut down remote US forests, truck them to the nearest railway station, transport them to a port, ship them to the UK then burn them to provide 5-10% of the UKs "green" energy?

Charlottesquare
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1775
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:22 pm
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 560 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387504

Postby Charlottesquare » February 17th, 2021, 4:20 pm

I either felled my own trees from our ground or bought felled lengths of birch from my neighbour and then cut and split it for our holiday house in Sweden, wood burning is the norm (we have an open fire) and every rural property burns logs. As we are only there limited time 2 cubic meters does a year but spotting the piles in houses as we drive past they must be cutting nearer 20- 30 cubic meters per house per year, some of the wood piles are bigger that a static home. Never noticed anything in the air, in fact the air seemed very clean compared with city living.

GrandOiseau
Lemon Slice
Posts: 529
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 12:18 am
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 76 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387512

Postby GrandOiseau » February 17th, 2021, 4:57 pm

I read this article and it got me thinking.

We bought our house in 2005 and it had a small open fire. We put some temporary boarding on it because we had young children. The whole fireplace wasn't great aesthetically so we had it redone and a log burner installed. We use it a dozen times on average in the winter I would say - using very well seasoned logs - mostly stuff cut down in our own or neighbours garden.

If I'd known what I am reading there we may have rebuilt the fireplace without anything. That wouldn't make sense now, it all still looks very new. Could of course just not use it but my feeling at the moment is that our use isn't too bad/extensive. Although I still have a tad of guilt.

It's all a bit of a shame in some ways as a good fire is nice and kind of feels like it shouldn't be a bad thing.

Any chance the science is challengeable I wonder...?

88V8
Lemon Half
Posts: 5768
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:22 am
Has thanked: 4097 times
Been thanked: 2560 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387514

Postby 88V8 » February 17th, 2021, 4:58 pm

We have two woodburners, Clearview 500.
They are both in use all winter as a necessary evening supplement to our storage heaters.

Out here in the sticks, so to speak, the particulates no doubt disperse, but I am inclined to think that they should not be allowed in areas where pollution is already high, such as city LEZs where they are in any event unnecessary due to the availability of mains gas and on the whole are a 'lifestyle' frippery for people who have central heating.

V8

GrandOiseau
Lemon Slice
Posts: 529
Joined: November 5th, 2016, 12:18 am
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 76 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387528

Postby GrandOiseau » February 17th, 2021, 5:25 pm

88V8 the article does say "Wood burners also triple the level of harmful pollution particles inside homes" so not good for the occupants.

Ours is purely lifestyle frippery no doubt although we are not in a particularly built up area.

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6072
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 441 times
Been thanked: 2324 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387532

Postby dealtn » February 17th, 2021, 5:58 pm

GrandOiseau wrote:88V8 the article does say "Wood burners also triple the level of harmful pollution particles inside homes" so not good for the occupants.

Ours is purely lifestyle frippery no doubt although we are not in a particularly built up area.


I am happy with making lifestyle choices that are potentially more harmful than others. It's part and parcel of enjoying life, and risk taking generally.

I drink wine not water, eat generally healthily but no doubt some will point out my non-vegetarian diet might be sub-optimal. Others will enjoy bikes on the road instead of the relative safety of cars. Burning wood on open fires might bring greater pleasure than a radiator.

Mental health and wellbeing are just as important factors in decisions made by individuals, particularly when they involve only small risks of physical harm.

Arborbridge
The full Lemon
Posts: 10366
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
Has thanked: 3599 times
Been thanked: 5227 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387533

Postby Arborbridge » February 17th, 2021, 5:58 pm

Dod101 wrote:I have a big woodburning stove and when the weather is as it has been for the last six weeks I have needed it. I use kiln dried logs which are supposed to burn more cleanly in every sense. As well as hopefully less pollution, they also do less harm to the chimney, but they are expensive. Currently I guess it is cheaper to use oil more, but of course there was time when, with the oil price going through the roof, it was the other way round.

However they are dirty or at least dusty to burn as I note only too well and what it is doing to my lungs.......

Dod


I imagine you with a huge stone fireplace, roaring log fire, in that Scottish castle of yours, complete with neo gothic windows.

No?

Arborbridge
The full Lemon
Posts: 10366
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
Has thanked: 3599 times
Been thanked: 5227 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387536

Postby Arborbridge » February 17th, 2021, 6:03 pm

Interesting, as a year ago I moved into a small village in Sussex. We have - I believe quite fresh air - but occationally we have the whole atmosphere reeking with something I can only call "smokey". I thought incineration, farmers burning stuff, local small firms etc etc. but none of these seemed active at the time of smelling it. I've come to the conclusion that there may be someone upwind of me with a woodburning stove. Much as I love them myself (my son has one in Devon) if I'm right, one stove can spoil clear air for many people.

Arb.

ReformedCharacter
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3120
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:12 am
Has thanked: 3590 times
Been thanked: 1509 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387540

Postby ReformedCharacter » February 17th, 2021, 6:31 pm

Arborbridge wrote:I've come to the conclusion that there may be someone upwind of me with a woodburning stove. Much as I love them myself (my son has one in Devon) if I'm right, one stove can spoil clear air for many people.

Arb.

I'm sure that's right. I burn a lot of logs, it's our main source of heat but I'm very careful to season and dry our fuel. In fact I've just about finished stacking the logs I bought last spring to dry out over the warmer and hopefully drier months. One of my neighbours buys newly felled logs and then covers them with a tarpaulin. You can't dry logs like that, they just stay damp and go mouldy. The worst smells seem to come from people who burn damp logs and coal together. That really is bad.

RC

Dod101
The full Lemon
Posts: 16629
Joined: October 10th, 2017, 11:33 am
Has thanked: 4343 times
Been thanked: 7534 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387609

Postby Dod101 » February 18th, 2021, 6:23 am

Arborbridge wrote:
Dod101 wrote:I have a big woodburning stove and when the weather is as it has been for the last six weeks I have needed it. I use kiln dried logs which are supposed to burn more cleanly in every sense. As well as hopefully less pollution, they also do less harm to the chimney, but they are expensive. Currently I guess it is cheaper to use oil more, but of course there was time when, with the oil price going through the roof, it was the other way round.

However they are dirty or at least dusty to burn as I note only too well and what it is doing to my lungs.......

Dod


I imagine you with a huge stone fireplace, roaring log fire, in that Scottish castle of yours, complete with neo gothic windows.

No?


Sadly no, but I do have quite a big fireplace! My place is a single storey biggish extension to a 19th century cottage which was originally a croft. It is rather open plan with a big central dining hall and takes a lot of heating. For the last few weeks of very cold weather we had very still air and the smell of woodburners I will admit.

Dod

Arborbridge
The full Lemon
Posts: 10366
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
Has thanked: 3599 times
Been thanked: 5227 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387615

Postby Arborbridge » February 18th, 2021, 7:11 am

Dod101 wrote:
Arborbridge wrote:
Dod101 wrote:I have a big woodburning stove and when the weather is as it has been for the last six weeks I have needed it. I use kiln dried logs which are supposed to burn more cleanly in every sense. As well as hopefully less pollution, they also do less harm to the chimney, but they are expensive. Currently I guess it is cheaper to use oil more, but of course there was time when, with the oil price going through the roof, it was the other way round.

However they are dirty or at least dusty to burn as I note only too well and what it is doing to my lungs.......

Dod


I imagine you with a huge stone fireplace, roaring log fire, in that Scottish castle of yours, complete with neo gothic windows.

No?


Sadly no, but I do have quite a big fireplace! My place is a single storey biggish extension to a 19th century cottage which was originally a croft. It is rather open plan with a big central dining hall and takes a lot of heating. For the last few weeks of very cold weather we had very still air and the smell of woodburners I will admit.

Dod


Well, you still have a mini-baronial dining hall, just not with the neo gothic windows. :)

servodude
Lemon Half
Posts: 8271
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
Has thanked: 4435 times
Been thanked: 3564 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387624

Postby servodude » February 18th, 2021, 7:34 am

Arborbridge wrote:
Dod101 wrote:
Arborbridge wrote:
I imagine you with a huge stone fireplace, roaring log fire, in that Scottish castle of yours, complete with neo gothic windows.

No?


Sadly no, but I do have quite a big fireplace! My place is a single storey biggish extension to a 19th century cottage which was originally a croft. It is rather open plan with a big central dining hall and takes a lot of heating. For the last few weeks of very cold weather we had very still air and the smell of woodburners I will admit.

Dod


Well, you still have a mini-baronial dining hall, just not with the neo gothic windows. :)


Do you write copy for estate agents? ;)

Arborbridge
The full Lemon
Posts: 10366
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:33 am
Has thanked: 3599 times
Been thanked: 5227 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387632

Postby Arborbridge » February 18th, 2021, 8:57 am

servodude wrote:
Arborbridge wrote:
Dod101 wrote:
Sadly no, but I do have quite a big fireplace! My place is a single storey biggish extension to a 19th century cottage which was originally a croft. It is rather open plan with a big central dining hall and takes a lot of heating. For the last few weeks of very cold weather we had very still air and the smell of woodburners I will admit.

Dod


Well, you still have a mini-baronial dining hall, just not with the neo gothic windows. :)


Do you write copy for estate agents? ;)


Not, but I've read plenty of them!

Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7084
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1637 times
Been thanked: 3791 times

Re: Wood-burning pollution

#387634

Postby Mike4 » February 18th, 2021, 8:58 am

servodude wrote:
Arborbridge wrote:
Dod101 wrote:
Sadly no, but I do have quite a big fireplace! My place is a single storey biggish extension to a 19th century cottage which was originally a croft. It is rather open plan with a big central dining hall and takes a lot of heating. For the last few weeks of very cold weather we had very still air and the smell of woodburners I will admit.

Dod


Well, you still have a mini-baronial dining hall, just not with the neo gothic windows. :)


Do you write copy for estate agents? ;)


Puts me in mind of back in the day when I had the bathroom shop, we had a posh bloke in looking at our ranges of bathroom fitted furniture which we made ourselves. One of the options was a tall shelf unit in an arched frame which we called a "Norman arch". Posh bloke confidently assured us it was not a Norman arch, it wasn't the right shape to be a Norman arch, but a gothic arch or something. He rather imperiously pulled rank, explaining he could be relied upon to be right as he was a professor of history at Surrey University, not far away.

I was delighted to be able to contradict him and explain that despite his exalted status it was definitely a Norman arch, as they were lovingly hand-made in our joinery department, by our joiner, Norman.

He didn't buy a bathroom from us....


Return to “Health & Wellbeing”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests