What Really Happens When We Fast?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhmtoAYVRSo
RC
Thanks to Howyoudoin,johnstevens77,Tortoise1000,Golam,Anonymous, for Donating to support the site
What Really Happens When We Fast?
ReformedCharacter wrote:A clear and informative video about the many health benefits of fasting - 11 minutes:What Really Happens When We Fast?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhmtoAYVRSo
RC
stevensfo wrote:
Has anyone tried a fast? I'm toying with the idea. I only take an expresso for breakfast and don't feel too hungry during the day, so I may try an evening 'One meal a day' for a while, but not sure how I'd cope with a 48 or 72 hour fast.
Steve
Snorvey wrote:These days, I stop eating at 7pm and don't eat again until 7.00am the next day. From what I read, 12 hours is pretty much the minimum to 'qualify' as a fast. You'd get more benefit from a 16:8 regime. Recently, I have discovered protein powder. Very good for supressing appetite for about 100 calories and probably good for anyone over 50. I take a glass with my dinner.
Up until I bust my leg, I also (occasionally) did what I call a 'Superfast Friday' which is a 24 hour liquid only fast from Thurday to Friday dinnertime, with an indoor rowing session thrown in at around 4pm. I'll probably go back to this when I am fully recovered.
I've done the 5:2 on a few occasions in the past, with decent success.
Maybe it's good to mix your fasting regimes up a bit.
bungeejumper wrote:Fraid my brain doesn't function if I fast. My work goes right down the drain, and I just can't focus. And I speak from regular experience. Every six months or so, I am required to do thirty hours without food for medical tests, and it's a kind of zombie existence until I can get some calories down me. At which point I finally start to wake up. Do I feel "energised" or "cleansed" or "regenerated"? Nope, I just feel ten ounces lighter and starving (and not in a good way).
So there we have it. Either I'm a fully-evolved 21st century specimen, or I'm a wimp who would never have survived the last Ice Age. Very possibly both.
BJ
When you are on a keto diet, or fasting, your brain can switch from using glucose as its main fuel source to using ketones. There are however portions of the brain that do require glucose for function. The brain will use some of the carbohydrates consumed on a ketogenic diet (~5-10% of calories is the usual range of carbohydrate consumed when eating a ketogenic diet) and the rest will be produced through gluconeogenesis in the liver. During gluconeogenesis, the liver will create glucose using amino acids from protein. Glucose can also be created through gluconeogenesis by using the backbone of fatty acids, glycerol. This process ensures that the portions of the brain that rely on glucose will have their preferred energy substrate in times of fasting or very low carbohydrate intake....
Ketone bodies reduce reactive oxygen species (ROS), a type of by-product molecule that can react with other molecules in a cell. The build up of ROS in cells can overwhelm antioxidant activity and can cause damage to DNA, RNA, proteins and lipids. ROS have been implicated in aging, neurodegeneration and carcinogenesis (the formation of cancer).
ReformedCharacter wrote:stevensfo wrote:
Has anyone tried a fast? I'm toying with the idea. I only take an expresso for breakfast and don't feel too hungry during the day, so I may try an evening 'One meal a day' for a while, but not sure how I'd cope with a 48 or 72 hour fast.
Steve
I've eaten one meal a day for a couple of decades. About once every 7-10 days I skip a day, giving a 48 hour fast. Recently I tried a 72 hour fast and I found the 72 hour fast no more difficult than a 48 hour fast. On a fasting day I usually (90% of the time) feel very little hunger and have no difficulty in abstaining from food, although I do drink tea or coffee with a little milk. As far as mood is concerned I feel more 'upbeat' than usual, somewhat 'uplifted'. My theory is that this is the reason why all major religions emphasise fasting on days of religious importance.
I find the idea that humans evolved to benefit for periods of ketosis persuasive and I strongly suspect that the modern habit of otherwise healthy adults eating 3 meals (or more) each day (and never experiencing ketosis) is unhealthy, specially when we are no longer young.
I have noticed that my skin seems healthier and clearer after fasting. People who haven't met me for a long time often say that I look younger than my age (early 60's). Looking at photos of my parents at the same age I'm inclined to agree. I am slightly lighter than I was at 16 with the same waist size. I exercise moderately and regularly, mainly on an exercise bike. On a fasting day I find the exercise slightly harder and my times slightly slower but not very noticeably so.
I have also noticed that after fasting I tend to choose healthy foods to finish the fast, I theorise that the human body does have the ability, through appetite, to determine which foods it needs to consume to maximise health (as do other animals) but that modern diets, particularly the consumption of sugar, has - for most people - negated this ability. I worked with dairy cattle for some time and they were provided with a block of minerals, probably calcium and magnesium mixed with molasses but I forget the details. Every now and again the cattle would have a few licks of the block, they obviously felt that they needed it but consumed no more than they needed. And I suspect that humans have this ability too but we have become more or less blind to it. Of course we have a food industry and now a culture of food-fetishism which has the effect of ruining our collective health whether it be by heart disease, diabetes or obesity.
My form of fasting may be a little extreme for many people but fortunately Dr. Michael Moseley and others have popularised the 5:2 diet and similar variations. My OH recently bought a copy of his 'The Fast 800' and it looks pretty useful.
RC
Safety, health improvement and well-being during a 4 to 21-day fasting period in an observational study including 1422 subjects.
Participants were divided into four groups according to the duration of their fasting period (Fig 1): F5d underwent a fasting period of 5±2 days, with an average of 5.4 (n = 695), F10d underwent a fasting period of 10±2 days, with an average of 8.6 (n = 530), F15d underwent a fasting period of 15±2 days, with an average of 14.1 (n = 196) and F20d underwent a fasting period of 20±2 days, with an average of 20.1 (n = 37).
In conclusion, this one-year observational study demonstrates the safety of a periodic Buchinger fast of between 4 and 21 days, as well as its beneficial effects on health and well-being. Periodic fasting led to marked weight loss and improvements in several cardiovascular risk factors, such as overweight, abdominal circumference and blood pressure. It was accompanied by normalization of numerous blood parameters and led to pronounced improvement of the major health complaint in most participants. Importantly, periodic Buchinger fasting was not linked to relevant perception of hunger. On the contrary, it was subjectively experienced as enjoyable, which is an important factor for compliance.
Return to “Health & Wellbeing”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests