Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77, for Donating to support the site

GDPR query

Straight answers to factual questions
Forum rules
Direct questions and answers, this room is not for general discussion please
DrFfybes
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3783
Joined: November 6th, 2016, 10:25 pm
Has thanked: 1192 times
Been thanked: 1981 times

GDPR query

#279238

Postby DrFfybes » January 22nd, 2020, 5:15 pm

We are looking to buy a house in Shropshire.

A garage with bedroom above gained planning in 2001, but the top floor wasn't built. We asked the vendor who says ground conditions meant deeper foundations were required. The vendor says they built deeper ones, but ran out of money for the upper story. We want to check what was built, which should be on the Building Regs file.

The council says they cannot show us the file under GDPR, even though the plans and details are available. Our solicitor could request it and it would be released.

My understanding is GDPR only applies to personal data, not one relating to a structure, and even so "The GDPR does not apply to certain activities including processing covered by the Law Enforcement Directive, processing for national security purposes and processing carried out by individuals purely for personal/household activities."

So are Shropshire CC just trying to fob me off?

thanks

Paul

Breelander
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4179
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:42 pm
Has thanked: 1001 times
Been thanked: 1855 times

Re: GDPR query

#279247

Postby Breelander » January 22nd, 2020, 6:04 pm

DrFfybes wrote:So are Shropshire CC just trying to fob me off?


Sure does sound like it....

You have the right to ask to see recorded information held by public authorities.
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act (FOISA) give you the right to see information.
https://www.gov.uk/make-a-freedom-of-in ... on-request

bungeejumper
Lemon Half
Posts: 8147
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 2:30 pm
Has thanked: 2896 times
Been thanked: 3985 times

Re: GDPR query

#279319

Postby bungeejumper » January 23rd, 2020, 8:47 am

Surely it must have been in the vendor's interest to make access to the document easy? Wouldn't this sort of thing have been in the TA6 sales pack'?

https://www.kfh.co.uk/resources/sellers ... e-required

BJ

DrFfybes
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3783
Joined: November 6th, 2016, 10:25 pm
Has thanked: 1192 times
Been thanked: 1981 times

Re: GDPR query

#279364

Postby DrFfybes » January 23rd, 2020, 10:32 am

bungeejumper wrote:Surely it must have been in the vendor's interest to make access to the document easy? Wouldn't this sort of thing have been in the TA6 sales pack'?

https://www.kfh.co.uk/resources/sellers ... e-required

BJ


The house is on with Purple Bricks - sort of saying "We're not too bothered if we sell so pay us what we want or go away" sowe want to check this detail before spending any money. We made a cash offer 6% under the asking price which was swiftly refused. We're in no rush, neither are they, so whilst we like the place weare not at all confident things will pan out properly,

I think the TA6 pack usually only becomes available when the sols send you the forms to fill in.

Paul

pochisoldi
Lemon Slice
Posts: 943
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:33 am
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 462 times

Re: GDPR query

#279393

Postby pochisoldi » January 23rd, 2020, 12:14 pm

bungeejumper wrote:Surely it must have been in the vendor's interest to make access to the document easy? Wouldn't this sort of thing have been in the TA6 sales pack'?

https://www.kfh.co.uk/resources/sellers ... e-required

BJ


The thing with the TA6 and subsequent enquiries is that when you ask a question that the vendor doesn't know the answer to, it is quite legit to respond "I don't know". The more technical/obscure the the question, the more likely that "plausible deniability" will work.

As far as the local building control office is concerned, their contradictory claim of "GDPR means no" and "solicitors request means yes" should be read as "If this is a casual enquiry - go away, if you are serious, then we will give you the information". The smaller the council, the more likely you are to run up against this kind of obstructive attitude. A FoI request would probably get the information released to a member of the public, but again, expect a smaller council to spend more effort (and get more job satisfaction) refusing the request than actually finding a way of keeping their "customer" happy.

didds
Lemon Half
Posts: 5310
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:04 pm
Has thanked: 3294 times
Been thanked: 1033 times

Re: GDPR query

#279418

Postby didds » January 23rd, 2020, 1:32 pm

DrFfybes wrote: Our solicitor could request it and it would be released.


so what if you were doing your own conveyancing?

sounds rubbish to me - a CYA approach

didds

pochisoldi
Lemon Slice
Posts: 943
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:33 am
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 462 times

Re: GDPR query

#279440

Postby pochisoldi » January 23rd, 2020, 2:38 pm

didds wrote:
DrFfybes wrote: Our solicitor could request it and it would be released.


so what if you were doing your own conveyancing?

sounds rubbish to me - a CYA approach

didds


Nope it's a "bugger off, leave me alone, I'm too busy dunking my biscuit in my brew" response.

modellingman
Lemon Slice
Posts: 621
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:46 pm
Has thanked: 608 times
Been thanked: 368 times

Re: GDPR query

#279463

Postby modellingman » January 23rd, 2020, 5:00 pm

DrFfybes wrote:We are looking to buy a house in Shropshire.

A garage with bedroom above gained planning in 2001, but the top floor wasn't built. We asked the vendor who says ground conditions meant deeper foundations were required. The vendor says they built deeper ones, but ran out of money for the upper story. We want to check what was built, which should be on the Building Regs file.

The council says they cannot show us the file under GDPR, even though the plans and details are available. Our solicitor could request it and it would be released.

My understanding is GDPR only applies to personal data, not one relating to a structure, and even so "The GDPR does not apply to certain activities including processing covered by the Law Enforcement Directive, processing for national security purposes and processing carried out by individuals purely for personal/household activities."

So are Shropshire CC just trying to fob me off?

thanks

Paul


If Shropshire are anything like County Durham, then GDPR may have put the fear of god into them. I have no idea what is held on the Building Regs file but if it includes anybody's name (such as the applicant for building control approval) then the council may well take the view that this means it constitutes personal data and can't be released. GDPR has made data protection the new elf and safety in quite a lot of areas.

I had a similar experience in a completely different context last Summer. I let to students and each year I send the CC the names of the tenants so that the properties and tenants get the student exemption from council tax. This year they wouldn't accept that and I had to send a separate notification for each property. The reason given was GDPR - if anybody made a subject access request, the Council argued, it would be necessary to release my email to them and this would disclose personal data of tenants in properties other than the one the data subject had lived in.


Return to “Does anyone know?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests