Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to gpadsa,Steffers0,lansdown,Wasron,jfgw, for Donating to support the site

Smartphones with best reception?

Straight answers to factual questions
Forum rules
Direct questions and answers, this room is not for general discussion please
bungeejumper
Lemon Half
Posts: 8177
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 2:30 pm
Has thanked: 2902 times
Been thanked: 4003 times

Smartphones with best reception?

#137772

Postby bungeejumper » May 9th, 2018, 1:20 pm

I hope this isn't a stupid question. Do some mobile phones have more robust antennae than others, and which ones are worth considering for best reception?

Over the last couple of years, mobile phone reception in our rural area has steadily deteriorated to the point where there's little point in anyone phoning me, because the G2 signal won't hold up for long even if I happen to hear the phone ring. (Most of the time, the signal is so weak that the phone doesn't even do that. It's only the call register that tells me afterwards that somebody has tried to ring me, and failed.)

I am on 02, which is the only network that even claims to provide a workable service for our area. (Vodafone works intermittently, EE and the rest don't work at all.) There is no immediate prospect of getting a 3G signal around these parts. Those factors appear to be a firm given, unfortunately. :(

So....... any recommendations? I am in a mood to change my 30 month old Nokia/Microsoft phone, probably for an Android set-up of some kind. What works best in a low-signal area?

TIA

BJ

scotia
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3569
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 2377 times
Been thanked: 1949 times

Re: Smartphones with best reception?

#137782

Postby scotia » May 9th, 2018, 1:46 pm

The old pre 3G phones had a simpler task of being optimised for one band, so may prove to be more sensitive - but they are not smart phones. You can still get such (cheap) phones - so, loaded with a pay as you go SIM, they may provide phone coverage in your area.
In our case, the weak Vodafone signal was a problem, so we installed at home a Sure Signal box which provided a local cell operating via our broadband (landline) connection.

bungeejumper
Lemon Half
Posts: 8177
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 2:30 pm
Has thanked: 2902 times
Been thanked: 4003 times

Re: Smartphones with best reception?

#137789

Postby bungeejumper » May 9th, 2018, 2:08 pm

scotia wrote:The old pre 3G phones had a simpler task of being optimised for one band, so may prove to be more sensitive - but they are not smart phones. You can still get such (cheap) phones - so, loaded with a pay as you go SIM, they may provide phone coverage in your area.

Ah, but I do need the full 3G works for when I'm away from home, so it'll need to be a proper smartphone.
In our case, the weak Vodafone signal was a problem, so we installed at home a Sure Signal box which provided a local cell operating via our broadband (landline) connection

I'm interested. :) So would that patch the phone's reception to the point where it would ring loudly and not drop the calls? I could see how it would allow 3G, of course, but then, I can get that with my present wifi. Thanks for the thought. Will investigate. :D

BJ

AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6385
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1882 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: Smartphones with best reception?

#137790

Postby AleisterCrowley » May 9th, 2018, 2:17 pm

As a general rule, as phones have got smaller/'smarter'/more complicated the radio performance has suffered- offset to some extent by improvements in radio technology.
Over the last couple of years, mobile phone reception in our rural area has steadily deteriorated
Could be several things;
a] Genuine reduction in signal strength, due to: tree growth, new buildings, site faults, site upgrades/optimisation (changing antenna orientations and tilts to deal with poor signal elsewhere, or interference), network consolidation (O2/Vodafone combining physical networks)
b] Constant signal, but worse perception as you upgrade to newer phones or a phone fault, possibly .

you may find, in case b, that an old Nokia like a 6110 works best as a phone !!
Can you borrow other phones to check, or see who else in your area uses O2 , and what their experiences are?

bungeejumper
Lemon Half
Posts: 8177
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 2:30 pm
Has thanked: 2902 times
Been thanked: 4003 times

Re: Smartphones with best reception?

#137792

Postby bungeejumper » May 9th, 2018, 2:35 pm

AleisterCrowley wrote:you may find, in case b, that an old Nokia like a 6110 works best as a phone !!
Can you borrow other phones to check, or see who else in your area uses O2 , and what their experiences are?

No, it's definitely a local signal issue. Most of my neighbours can only get a workable 2G signal if they walk out into their gardens. (LOL, my daughter in Warwickshire has to walk nearly half a mile to the far end of her village! And that's with a whizzbang iPhone.)

A lot of people would be surprised at how bad rural reception can be, because it's becoming normal these days for people to make the mobile number a key part of their routine contact arrangements . It became an issue recently when my local hospital demanded my mobile number so that they could contact me, but then they couldn't reach me when they needed to. :cry: It was also an issue for a friend whose car broke down and who then couldn't call the rescue services. And again, when I needed a texted code to confirm a change to an online store card order but couldn't read the code that they'd sent me. Sigh.

I gather that Sure Signal is a Vodafone-only thing. And that 02 does have something similar but it seems to be only available for business lines. Will keep looking.

BJ

AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6385
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1882 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: Smartphones with best reception?

#137800

Postby AleisterCrowley » May 9th, 2018, 3:16 pm

I'm surprised it's actually degraded over time, or is it the 'deaf smartphone' effect? A relation of mine who lives in a village has noticed the same - his smartphone is poor compared with his old 2G phone.
Anyone you know use a old style talk and text mobile? Some people keep them as back up.

As mentioned above, could be down to network consolidation (which improves overall coverage, but can degrade small areas)

Try contacting O2 customer care - they should be able to advise, and at least the case gets logged.

stewamax
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2469
Joined: November 7th, 2016, 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 816 times

Re: Smartphones with best reception?

#137850

Postby stewamax » May 9th, 2018, 5:36 pm

Sure Signal is a Vodafone-only thing

EE have Signal Box which, if you can demonstrate to them that you are in a dead or 'doubtful' area for their signal (do your homework and check their coverage maps first), they will send you free. Only covers a small area in and around the house but works flawlessly and makes a big difference.

gryffron
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3647
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:00 am
Has thanked: 566 times
Been thanked: 1617 times

Re: Smartphones with best reception?

#137864

Postby gryffron » May 9th, 2018, 6:43 pm

bungeejumper wrote:So....... any recommendations? I am in a mood to change my 30 month old Nokia/Microsoft phone, probably for an Android set-up of some kind. What works best in a low-signal area?

It's very hit and miss. Radio reception is a dark art. Modern mobiles don't have any radio tuning at all. They just listen to the background noise and then crunch the data mathematically to find the signal. As the number crunching has got ever more powerful, so the size of aerials has decreased. Now disappearing inside the phone. So the effectiveness is just as much down to software as to hardware. Even a software upgrade can make quite a difference to radio reception.

The downside of this, is that their range effectiveness is largely independent even of model. Last week's batch of the same phone may have different software and behave completely differently. Which doesn't really help you to answer your question :(

A local micronode, or talk-over-wifi with AppleTalk or some Skype option will likely be the most reliable solution.

Gryff

swill453
Lemon Half
Posts: 7992
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:11 pm
Has thanked: 995 times
Been thanked: 3662 times

Re: Smartphones with best reception?

#137872

Postby swill453 » May 9th, 2018, 7:04 pm

gryffron wrote:A local micronode, or talk-over-wifi with AppleTalk or some Skype option will likely be the most reliable solution.

Or even an old-tech solution - diverting the mobile number to a landline.

(solving the problem stated in the OP - missing incoming calls)

Scott.

Stompa
Lemon Slice
Posts: 829
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 6:29 pm
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 208 times

Re: Smartphones with best reception?

#137946

Postby Stompa » May 9th, 2018, 10:49 pm

WiFi Calling?

https://www.o2.co.uk/connectivity/wifi-and-4g-calling

You’ll be able to make and take calls wherever you have a wifi connection...

dionaeamuscipula
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1101
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:25 pm
Has thanked: 103 times
Been thanked: 377 times

Re: Smartphones with best reception?

#138084

Postby dionaeamuscipula » May 10th, 2018, 2:31 pm

EE have WiFi calling (which is what the sure signal and similar boxes provide) as standard on the devices we use for work. I've had only one person complain about signal strength since then, we got him a box and he is OK now, but I suspect he had managed to stuff up his WiFi Calling set up in some way - he is techno useless.

The software diverts calls automatically through your broadband and wifi router.

DM

DM

stockton
Lemon Slice
Posts: 326
Joined: November 30th, 2016, 7:19 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 58 times

Re: Smartphones with best reception?

#138180

Postby stockton » May 10th, 2018, 9:29 pm

AleisterCrowley wrote:I'm surprised it's actually degraded over time


This sort of degradation seems to be very common. It is certainly not helped by the fact that there seems to be no effective way of providing feedback to mobile service providers where a relatively small number of customers are involved.

AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6385
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1882 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: Smartphones with best reception?

#138183

Postby AleisterCrowley » May 10th, 2018, 9:35 pm

It does happen, but wouldn't say it's common.
Gradual degradation over an area (as opposed to sudden drops) is usually down to: tree growth , new buildings, antenna/feeder degradation at site.
A perceived general degradation can be caused by gradual take up of newer (and 'deafer' from a radio perspective) smartphones

AF62
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3499
Joined: November 27th, 2016, 8:45 am
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1278 times

Re: Smartphones with best reception?

#138570

Postby AF62 » May 12th, 2018, 4:46 pm

dionaeamuscipula wrote:EE have WiFi calling (which is what the sure signal and similar boxes provide) as standard on the devices we use for work.


WiFi calling and the sure signal boxes are completely different and the only connection is they both plug into your broadband.

WiFi calling allows the phone to use WiFi to make and receive phone calls, i.e. it is a VOIP solution. It normally requires a specific model of phone to work, for example EE''s list - https://ee.co.uk/help/help-new/getting- ... fi-calling

Sure Signal and similar are femtocells which are low powered mobile phone 'masts' which work with any mobile phone (although with some companies like Vodafone you have to register the phones you want to use, but with EE you don't). However they are much harder to get hold of these days (I have an EE boster but I don't think they supply them any more).

If you want to buy a new phone then WiFi calling is probably the way to go, if you don't then Sure Signal devices (if you can get hold of one).


Return to “Does anyone know?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests