Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77, for Donating to support the site

Using compressed leaves for a log burner

Straight answers to factual questions
Forum rules
Direct questions and answers, this room is not for general discussion please
UncleIan
Lemon Slice
Posts: 954
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:35 pm
Has thanked: 616 times
Been thanked: 456 times

Re: Using compressed leaves for a log burner

#5925

Postby UncleIan » November 17th, 2016, 1:33 pm

woolly wrote:I will second (or third) the opinion that ash/oak is best - puzzled that with all the ash dieback going on it is still in short supply...


At a guess, maybe the ash affected from dieback can only be sold very locally, or not at all, for fear of spreading it.

As for ash/oak being best, my local scout campsite gets all sorts of offcuts and fence panels and crap, but the best stuff we ever found on there were oak shingle offcuts. Stick a few of them on the fire and you were warm all evening. Lovely stuff. Let's ignore whether they were treated or not. I think not. Probably.

woolly wrote:UncleIan - loved the firewood poem, one to pin on wall of wood lore in the wood store. The olden-days folk had such a succinct way of passing on useful knowledge!


Thanks. I saw it on the wall of my local. Near the open fire. Naturally.

Ian

Minesadouble
2 Lemon pips
Posts: 148
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:20 am
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Using compressed leaves for a log burner

#7798

Postby Minesadouble » November 22nd, 2016, 3:32 pm

Just to add to this fount of knowledge on wood burning:

Ash - in my experience the best bar none

Holly - the only wood I burn green, no need to season this one!
In addition once cross cut I'd advise splitting Holly ASAP, as it turns extremely hard if left unsplit and stacked somewhere, as I found to my cost.

I burn all of my wood the following year after splitting and stacking which means it's stacked for about 18 months - two years before it's burnt, stack under cover but with good airflow around it, you do need space to do this.

All of mine comes from fallen trees and boughs on my own property although I bought some this summer for the first time in six years. You do need to stay organised and plan well ahead, I've often had wood being stacked with a summer barbecue in full swing!

FarmerTom
Posts: 34
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:59 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Using compressed leaves for a log burner

#7904

Postby FarmerTom » November 22nd, 2016, 8:03 pm

I hate the poem.

I believe it was written in the 19th century for open fires. ( edit: it was 1930)
This is the 21st century, we use woodstoves. Very different environment.

Try this one:-
Dry wood burns with lovely flame, wood thats wet is a total pain.
Dry wood burns and gives you heat, wet wood will not warm your feet.
Poplar, Elm, Ash, conifer or Oak will not burn if they are soaked!
Don't be fooled by pointless rhymes, come boys and girls move with the times!!

Burning 'green' wood steals heat from the stove in order to evaporate the water, then deposits it in the flue.
Recipe for a bunged-up flue and chimney fire.

ReformedCharacter
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3141
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:12 am
Has thanked: 3642 times
Been thanked: 1522 times

Re: Using compressed leaves for a log burner

#41703

Postby ReformedCharacter » March 27th, 2017, 7:08 pm

Just need some drying weather...

Image

RC

OSWALDO
Posts: 1
Joined: April 27th, 2022, 11:16 pm
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Using compressed leaves for a log burner

#497095

Postby OSWALDO » April 27th, 2022, 11:34 pm

Hello. I'm from Brazil and because I don't know how to write very well in English, I wrote in Portuguese and had to google translate.
Getting to the point: Very cool your technique to make the wood more porous through humidity and rotting and so it will burn with greater heat. But experts I've heard say that with this technique many of the flammable materials of the firewood are lost through the digestion of bacteria and so although the firewood burns more strongly because it is more porous and less dense but it will be quickly consumed by the fire in a few minutes or few hours, much faster than the denser logs that did not suffer the action of bacteria in the midst of excessive humidity. Thus, you gain in fire power but lose in burning time, which will be much shorter. It all depends on your need. If you need a fire that starts faster and produces ember quickly then use this technique, but if you need the wood burning and the fire to last longer then use the traditional drying technique. A hug to everyone. I hope I have contributed something good to anyone who reads it. God blesses.

88V8
Lemon Half
Posts: 5840
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:22 am
Has thanked: 4190 times
Been thanked: 2602 times

Re: Using compressed leaves for a log burner

#497486

Postby 88V8 » April 29th, 2022, 3:09 pm

OSWALDO wrote:Hello. I'm from Brazil and because I don't know how to write very well in English, I wrote in Portuguese ...you gain in fire power but lose in burning time, which will be much shorter.

Hello and welcome.
Yes, you are right.
The dryest wood burns fastest.

There is a happy medium.
Seasoned wood is good.
But in our woodburner, kiln-dried wood burns too fast.

My experience.

V8

scrumpyjack
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4859
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 10:15 am
Has thanked: 614 times
Been thanked: 2706 times

Re: Using compressed leaves for a log burner

#497493

Postby scrumpyjack » April 29th, 2022, 3:39 pm

All our wood comes from our own garden and I have enough to last us out as I had to have the arborist cut up so many trees due to storm damage or age (danger to the road).

I would add that Apple tree wood is excellent IMO. Most of our wood is Ash, some Oak, Eucalyptus etc etc.
It must be very dry (several years ideally) but you should split the logs when it is still green, much easier).

Dod101
The full Lemon
Posts: 16629
Joined: October 10th, 2017, 11:33 am
Has thanked: 4343 times
Been thanked: 7536 times

Re: Using compressed leaves for a log burner

#497497

Postby Dod101 » April 29th, 2022, 3:44 pm

88V8 wrote:
OSWALDO wrote:Hello. I'm from Brazil and because I don't know how to write very well in English, I wrote in Portuguese ...you gain in fire power but lose in burning time, which will be much shorter.

Hello and welcome.
Yes, you are right.
The dryest wood burns fastest.

There is a happy medium.
Seasoned wood is good.
But in our woodburner, kiln-dried wood burns too fast.

My experience.

V8


I do not think that it is because it is kiln dried that causes it to burn too fast. It is probably a combination of the type of wood and its water content. Oak and buckthorn are both relatively slow burning and around 20% water content seems to be accepted as the norm. In fact did I not read somewhere that all wood burners should burn logs with no more than a 20% water content? Furthermore of course woodburners need maintenance to ensure that they are airtight around the doors and ashpan. That usually means renewing the rope seals annually.

Actually seasoned wood is not just good, it is essential if you want to keep the flue in reasonable condition.

As a total aside, I was completely thrown with the date of this thread. It has been going for 6 years off and on.

Dod

88V8
Lemon Half
Posts: 5840
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:22 am
Has thanked: 4190 times
Been thanked: 2602 times

Re: Using compressed leaves for a log burner

#497548

Postby 88V8 » April 29th, 2022, 6:43 pm

Dod101 wrote:I do not think that it is because it is kiln dried that causes it to burn too fast. It is probably a combination of the type of wood and its water content.
Actually seasoned wood is not just good, it is essential if you want to keep the flue in reasonable condition.

As a total aside, I was completely thrown with the date of this thread. It has been going for 6 years off and on.

So the thread is well seasoned. :)

The chaps from whom we buy, kiln some of their wood so they have something to sell when they run out of seasoned. On occasions I have bought the kilned when we ran out, so in saying it burns faster I am making a direct comparison.

Do entirely agree that woodburners need seasoned wood.
The PO here burnt any old rubbish and kept his logpile under a tarp on the drive.
Also they had no thermometer on the stovepipe and it was apparent from the distortion of the casing that they had overheated it, so after our first winter it was scrapped and replaced with a new one.
He was and is a nuclear physicist but where wood was concerned he was a clot.

V8

ReformedCharacter
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 3141
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:12 am
Has thanked: 3642 times
Been thanked: 1522 times

Re: Using compressed leaves for a log burner

#497555

Postby ReformedCharacter » April 29th, 2022, 6:50 pm

88V8 wrote:
OSWALDO wrote:Hello. I'm from Brazil and because I don't know how to write very well in English, I wrote in Portuguese ...you gain in fire power but lose in burning time, which will be much shorter.

Hello and welcome.
Yes, you are right.
The dryest wood burns fastest.

There is a happy medium.
Seasoned wood is good.
But in our woodburner, kiln-dried wood burns too fast.

My experience.

V8

I've not tried kiln-dried logs, but can't you just close the air control a bit more?

RC


Return to “Does anyone know?”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests