Crypto self-custody

[Urbandreamer]

There was a recent post on the crypto board about self-custody.

I had just finished writing a response explaining that while I personally like self-custody, many here value holding the likes of their ISA shares with a nominee. I.E with a custodian.

The post was gone before I could respond. I'm curious as to why. I saw nothing actually offensive about questioning why people might think that it was difficult to hold your own bitcoin.

Was there a complaint and what was the nature of the complaint?
Was it a perceived aggression on the part of the person posting?
Were they a new poster, we have had a lot that do seem to be "less than honest" recently.

[Urbandreamer]

There is another post on that board.
viewtopic.php?p=667520#p667520
Again not offensive.

But from a new poster. How about letting it ride a day.
I'm not interested in the subject of the post and can ignore it.

[Clariman]

Sorry that you took the time and trouble to write a reply which went nowhere. I've looked through the logs and can see that a moderator deleted a series of posts from that user (and others with similar names) which had been reported as spam.

Clariman

[Urbandreamer]

Sorry that you took the time and trouble to write a reply which went nowhere. I've looked through the logs and can see that a moderator deleted a series of posts from that user (and others with similar names) which had been reported as spam.

Clariman

Thanks C. We did have a lot of spam that day.