The Lemon Fool

XFool wrote:

Lootman wrote:

XFool wrote:Which exactly proves my point - that you DON'T get my point! (But you won't get it)

Enough already.

Ah I see, so your killer argument is that you think you are right.

Newsflash - everyone does!

I refer you to my previous post(s).

As do I.

there's an important thing that the authorities are afraid to speak about: promiscuity

AsleepInYorkshire wrote:Does anyone know where these statistics come from or are they made up please?

Gyms have an infection rate of 0.35 per 100,000 visits.

The County of Lancashire has a suicide rate of 12.8 per 100,000 people.

Thank you

AiY

The suicide rate is believable because it is in line with the UK as a whole.
The Gym statistic has all the hallmarks of something that has been completely invented as accuracy of determining source of infection is not unlikely and the actual number if it could be measured will vary massively according to prevalence rates.

look wrote:there's an important thing that the authorities are afraid to speak about: promiscuity

Too much or not enough?

Charlottesquare wrote:

look wrote:there's an important thing that the authorities are afraid to speak about: promiscuity

Too much or not enough?

I have not yet seen any authority claim that promiscuity can increase contagion.

I think sexual promiscuity is important.

look wrote:

Charlottesquare wrote:

look wrote:there's an important thing that the authorities are afraid to speak about: promiscuity

Too much or not enough?

I have not yet seen any authority claim that promiscuity can increase contagion.

I think sexual promiscuity is important.

I think we can consider it covered under the guidance regards "social distancing"

- sd

servodude wrote:

look wrote:

Charlottesquare wrote:
Too much or not enough?

I have not yet seen any authority claim that promiscuity can increase contagion.

I think sexual promiscuity is important.

I think we can consider it covered under the guidance regards "social distancing"

- sd

E disagree, servodude. For the most people, social distance doesn't include family members.
They consider the spouse and the other or others part of family. The same for husband and other or others.
The most peoople don't include the family in social distancing.
I think the leaders fail by not complaining directly against promiscuity.

in my city, with a bit more than 100 th. inhabitants, only 9 deaths until now, but one was of a mother of a politician. The first victim was a truck driver that had relations with a prostitute.

look wrote:

servodude wrote:

look wrote:
I have not yet seen any authority claim that promiscuity can increase contagion.

I think sexual promiscuity is important.

I think we can consider it covered under the guidance regards "social distancing"

- sd

E disagree, servodude. For the most people, social distance doesn't include family members.
They consider the spouse and the other or others part of family. The same for husband and other or others.
The most peoople don't include the family in social distancing.
I think the leaders fail by not complaining directly against promiscuity.

in my city, with a bit more than 100 th. inhabitants, only 9 deaths until now, but one was of a mother of a politician. The first victim was a truck driver that had relations with a prostitute.

unless that prostitute was part of his family it should have been covered by the social distancing guidelines

look wrote:

Charlottesquare wrote:

look wrote:there's an important thing that the authorities are afraid to speak about: promiscuity

Too much or not enough?

I have not yet seen any authority claim that promiscuity can increase contagion.

I think sexual promiscuity is important.

Just insist they all use masks during the process.

servodude wrote:

look wrote:

servodude wrote:
I think we can consider it covered under the guidance regards "social distancing"

- sd

E disagree, servodude. For the most people, social distance doesn't include family members.
They consider the spouse and the other or others part of family. The same for husband and other or others.
The most peoople don't include the family in social distancing.
I think the leaders fail by not complaining directly against promiscuity.

in my city, with a bit more than 100 th. inhabitants, only 9 deaths until now, but one was of a mother of a politician. The first victim was a truck driver that had relations with a prostitute.

unless that prostitute was part of his family it should have been covered by the social distancing guidelines

If part of his family it seems they could have an issue beyond Covid, the game all the family can play springing to mind.

Charlottesquare wrote:

servodude wrote:

look wrote:
E disagree, servodude. For the most people, social distance doesn't include family members.
They consider the spouse and the other or others part of family. The same for husband and other or others.
The most peoople don't include the family in social distancing.
I think the leaders fail by not complaining directly against promiscuity.

in my city, with a bit more than 100 th. inhabitants, only 9 deaths until now, but one was of a mother of a politician. The first victim was a truck driver that had relations with a prostitute.

unless that prostitute was part of his family it should have been covered by the social distancing guidelines

If part of his family it seems they could have an issue beyond Covid, the game all the family can play springing to mind.

I hear "it's best".. and I'm married to a Tasmanian
-sd

look wrote:I have not yet seen any authority claim that promiscuity can increase contagion.

I think sexual promiscuity is important.

Quite so. In Brazil, can I buy it freely over the counter, or would I need to ask my doctor?

BJ

look wrote:I think sexual promiscuity is important.

Are there any other types?

Mike4 wrote:

look wrote:I think sexual promiscuity is important.

Are there any other types?

well there is packet sniffing - actually that sounds wrong out of context

Charlottesquare wrote:

look wrote:

Charlottesquare wrote:
Too much or not enough?

I have not yet seen any authority claim that promiscuity can increase contagion.

I think sexual promiscuity is important.

Just insist they all use masks during the process.

I think that other body fluids transmitit it too, so the masks wouldn't prevent covid transmission.

look wrote:

servodude wrote:

look wrote:
I have not yet seen any authority claim that promiscuity can increase contagion.

I think sexual promiscuity is important.

I think we can consider it covered under the guidance regards "social distancing"

- sd

E disagree, servodude. For the most people, social distance doesn't include family members.
They consider the spouse and the other or others part of family. The same for husband and other or others.
The most peoople don't include the family in social distancing.
I think the leaders fail by not complaining directly against promiscuity.

in my city, with a bit more than 100 th. inhabitants, only 9 deaths until now, but one was of a mother of a politician. The first victim was a truck driver that had relations with a prostitute.

I think social distance is too abstrat, it don't really enters in the mind of people.
the mankind is needing that some leader says: stop with promiscuity, vagabonds

look wrote:

Charlottesquare wrote:

look wrote:

I have not yet seen any authority claim that promiscuity can increase contagion.

I think sexual promiscuity is important.

Just insist they all use masks during the process.

I think that other body fluids transmitit it too, so the masks wouldn't prevent covid transmission.

Well maybe your plan will work, ban it outright and in 100 odd years the last person dies and then Covid is no longer an issue for humans, merely eliminate the hosts.

sex between a couple is one thing, promiscuity is other thing

there is an article in the site wallstreet.com with this title:

WE MIGHT GET BACK TO NORMAL EVEN BEFORE VACCINE BY USING THIS CENTURY-OLD METHOD TO TREAT COVID-19


the method is the blood-plasma therapy

Olumiant is an arthritis drug found to reduce death from covid by two thirds in older patients!

This is today,s good news!

https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2020 ... two-thirds