murraypaul wrote:dealtn wrote:The imms team turn up with 300 (plus a few) vaccinations. Do you think the 200 children are going to be presented to the imms team for them to discuss with them the "no" or "no reply" responses?
No, I think any child that had declared to the school that they wanted the vaccine despite a lack of parental approval would be.I suggest, in practice, only very few children that have declared a wish to be vaccinated but the school (and imms team) haven't received a "yes" consent will be presented for Gillick competency, in coordination with attempts from the school to involve the parents.
Yes, that is what I would expect also. (Assuming you mean that very few children would declare the wish, rather than that of all the children that did so, very few would be presented.)
That isn't the same as:The imms team will only be introduced to children that have received parental consent, so won't know of any child without consent, but wanting vaccination.
I think we are almost exactly aligned. The confusion is my incorrect use of "know" in that quoted sentence. They will "know" because they will be informed by the school, who also know. What I should have better explained is they won't be in a position to be the ones that first "know" or "discover" this child, and their wish to be vaccinated.
My sloppiness, and correctly pointed out. Thank you.