Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva, for Donating to support the site

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

The home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
Forum rules
This is the home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
Daytona
Posts: 40
Joined: November 17th, 2016, 12:48 pm
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#395357

Postby Daytona » March 14th, 2021, 8:25 am

Is there any handle on the increase in deaths after each relaxation ?

EssDeeAitch
Lemon Slice
Posts: 655
Joined: August 31st, 2018, 9:08 pm
Has thanked: 268 times
Been thanked: 251 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#395794

Postby EssDeeAitch » March 15th, 2021, 3:32 pm

I am really bemused by the data. Despite having vaccinated far more of our population that other European countries, we still seem to have a high death toll. How is it that Germany with only a third of our vaccination count has fewer deaths/case?

Why has Germany far fewer cases than the UK and critically, far fewer deaths than the UK? Fewer cases can be attributed to quicker lockdown and a more disciplined population I suppose and fewer deaths to better healthcare provision and a fitter, younger population? But I would have expected the death rate to have turned significantly in the last week as the benefit of vaccinations kicks in. What am I missing?

Image

Bouleversee
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4654
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:01 pm
Has thanked: 1195 times
Been thanked: 903 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#395796

Postby Bouleversee » March 15th, 2021, 3:39 pm

EssDeeAitch wrote:I am really bemused by the data. Despite having vaccinated far more of our population that other European countries, we still seem to have a high death toll. How is it that Germany with only a third of our vaccination count has fewer deaths/case?

Why has Germany far fewer cases than the UK and critically, far fewer deaths than the UK? Fewer cases can be attributed to quicker lockdown and a more disciplined population I suppose and fewer deaths to better healthcare provision and a fitter, younger population? But I would have expected the death rate to have turned significantly in the last week as the benefit of vaccinations kicks in. What am I missing?

Image


Could it be that not very many have as yet had their second dose so have limited protection?

PinkDalek
Lemon Half
Posts: 6139
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 1:12 pm
Has thanked: 1589 times
Been thanked: 1801 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#395797

Postby PinkDalek » March 15th, 2021, 3:42 pm

EssDeeAitch wrote:Why has Germany far fewer cases than the UK and critically, far fewer deaths than the UK?


Does your table confirm your narrative re Cases/million and Deaths/million?

1nvest
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4406
Joined: May 31st, 2019, 7:55 pm
Has thanked: 691 times
Been thanked: 1343 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#395799

Postby 1nvest » March 15th, 2021, 3:46 pm

Proper test, trace and lockdowns.

Not the UK version of a lockdown pretence. Let it in and look for herd immunity (good job it wasn't something like Ebola). Where during 'lockdown' your mate drives the length of the country and back down again. Or your dad goes off gallivanting around Europe. In some countries you had to have groceries delivered and the infrastructure for that was set up accordingly. In the UK you couldn't get home deliveries or if you could then they delivered very little. Roads are just mildly less congested. Millions flew into the UK totally unchecked/unrecorded ...etc.

In short we have a 'government' (Parliament) that just manages crises more often of its own making, doesn't actually govern. a.k.a incompetent. A minority actually voting and a government formed from just 20% of the population having voted for it is a reflection of how such incompetence is commonly expected/accepted. When your choices are a idiot or a fool, most simply just shrug and give-up opting to vote at all.

dealtn
Lemon Half
Posts: 6091
Joined: November 21st, 2016, 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 442 times
Been thanked: 2338 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#395804

Postby dealtn » March 15th, 2021, 3:51 pm

EssDeeAitch wrote:
Why has Germany far fewer cases than the UK and critically, far fewer deaths than the UK? ... What am I missing?

Image


The fact that, according to the data in that table, Germany has 71,337 "cases" which isn't "far fewer" than the 39,918 in the UK?

The fact that, according to the data in that table, Germany has 1,443 "deaths" which isn't "far fewer" than the 1,015 in the UK?

What am I missing?

EssDeeAitch
Lemon Slice
Posts: 655
Joined: August 31st, 2018, 9:08 pm
Has thanked: 268 times
Been thanked: 251 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#395809

Postby EssDeeAitch » March 15th, 2021, 3:59 pm

dealtn wrote:
EssDeeAitch wrote:
Why has Germany far fewer cases than the UK and critically, far fewer deaths than the UK? ... What am I missing?

Image


The fact that, according to the data in that table, Germany has 71,337 "cases" which isn't "far fewer" than the 39,918 in the UK?

The fact that, according to the data in that table, Germany has 1,443 "deaths" which isn't "far fewer" than the 1,015 in the UK?

What am I missing?


I should have been more precise, apologies. The "fewer" that I refer to are the overall values since the start of the pandemic and not those for the last week as shown in the table.

jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2562
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1104 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#395914

Postby jfgw » March 15th, 2021, 8:12 pm

The UK has a high number of deaths per case but how are deaths and cases defined in other countries?

Cases and deaths in the UK and Spain are falling. Deaths within a given week will be due to infections in previous weeks when infections were higher so the deaths/case figure will be artificially high.

I have applied a 7-day offset and have only looked at the higher age groups here. The deaths/cases ratio seems to vary a lot. This graph is based upon the heatmap data for England, https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/.

That could well be the vaccine kicking in with the highest age groups,

Image
My graph. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. : https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

I would be interested in any suggestions for an accurate offset. I chose 7 days after a brief search.


Julian F. G. W.

servodude
Lemon Half
Posts: 8370
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
Has thanked: 4471 times
Been thanked: 3601 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#395970

Postby servodude » March 15th, 2021, 11:54 pm

jfgw wrote:I would be interested in any suggestions for an accurate offset. I chose 7 days after a brief search.


It's probably close enough - given there's loads of noise

Two papers I've had bookmarked cover the lags and the spread of values recorded

- this gives 10-11 days after symptoms as the most likely time to die
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.23.20160895v7.full

- this indicates unsurprisingly that you are most likely to come down with symptoms around the time you test positive
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.18.20156307v1.full-text


- sd

jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2562
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1104 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#398095

Postby jfgw » March 22nd, 2021, 8:24 pm

An increasing proportion of new positives are schoolchildren,

Image
My graph. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. : https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

Regarding the lateral flow tests used in schools,

"Deeks says that at a lower prevalence (0.5%), around half of positive tests would be false positives"
https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n706

The percentage of lateral flow tests which are followed by a positive PCR is falling. Without knowing how many lateral flow tests are followed by negative PCR tests (as opposed to not being followed by a PCR test at all), these data don't tell us much.

Image
My graph. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. : https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

I have repeated the first chart but omitting under 20s,

Image
My graph. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. : https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

The vaccinated age groups seem to be fairing better.


Julian F. G. W.

funduffer
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1338
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 123 times
Been thanked: 843 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#398158

Postby funduffer » March 23rd, 2021, 7:51 am

Fantastic charts!

I commend the 2 Julians for their insightful contributions to this board!

FD

Julian
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1389
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:58 am
Has thanked: 534 times
Been thanked: 677 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#398636

Postby Julian » March 24th, 2021, 12:48 pm

funduffer wrote:Fantastic charts!

I commend the 2 Julians for their insightful contributions to this board!

FD

It felt a bit self-serving to hit the thumbs-up on your post since the forum shows that as a "rec(ommendation)" so, assuming I am one of the "2 Julians" you mentioned, I'm posting this reply instead to say thanks for the kind words FD.

- Julian

zico
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2145
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:12 pm
Has thanked: 1078 times
Been thanked: 1091 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#398991

Postby zico » March 25th, 2021, 6:17 pm

Just tying together the various coronavirus stats.

Deaths within 28 days of 1st Covid positive test = 126,283
Deaths registered with Covid mentioned on death certificate as one of the causes = 149,117
Excess deaths = 124,400 (estimated by Chris Giles - FT)

It's been estimated that Covid deaths result in an average 12 years loss of life.
So, of the 60,000 that died in the first wave, we'd expect 5,000 (1/12) to have died anyway by now.
Around 17,000 people die of flu in a normal year. Covid precautions have been strong enough to virtually eliminate flu, so these deaths haven't happened this year.
The above 2 figures amount to 23,000 which seems to explain the difference very closely between the excess deaths figure of 124,000 and the "Deaths registered" figure of 149,000.
In effect, the Covid pandemic has brought forward 6,000 deaths by a year, and also saved 17,000 people dying of flu.

As I've said before, I believe excess deaths are the most accurate measure of the Covid pandemic.

1nvest
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 4406
Joined: May 31st, 2019, 7:55 pm
Has thanked: 691 times
Been thanked: 1343 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#399766

Postby 1nvest » March 28th, 2021, 1:39 pm

As I've said before, I believe excess deaths are the most accurate measure of the Covid pandemic

1976 UK 681K deaths 57M population
2020 UK 696K deaths 67M population

Proportioned to a 67M population size and 1976 would have had 800K deaths, so 2020 'excess' is a NEGATIVE 100K on that measure.

They are both local peak years, adjacent years were lower, as might 2019 and 2021 see lower levels. The higher number of deaths in 1976 was primarily due to a heat wave. Recall it well as that was the year I was taking my school exams.

jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2562
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1104 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#416639

Postby jfgw » June 1st, 2021, 6:10 pm

Hospital admissions are going up in the North West, with quite a noticeable upturn in mechanical ventilator bed occupancy.

Image
Image
Image
My graphs. Contain public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. : https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/


Julian F. G. W.

jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2562
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1104 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#416645

Postby jfgw » June 1st, 2021, 6:32 pm

England age distribution:
Rate of people with at least one positive COVID-19 test result, either lab-reported or rapid lateral flow test (England only) per 100,000 population in the rolling 7-day period ending on the dates shown, by age. Positive rapid lateral flow test results can be confirmed with PCR tests taken within 72 hours. If the PCR test results are negative, these are not reported as cases. People tested positive more than once are only counted once, on the date of their first positive test.
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/cases?areaType=nation&areaName=England

Image
My graph. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. : https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

Julian F. G. W.

jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2562
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1104 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#456648

Postby jfgw » November 8th, 2021, 8:06 pm

Cases among the 10—14 age group falling rapidly.
Image
My graph. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. : https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

Here is the same graph but with the y-axis scaled up.
For the 40+ age groups, higher age groups correlate with lower case rates.
For the 20—39 age groups, higher age groups correlate with higher case rates.

Image
My graph. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. : https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

Vaccine first dose: 18—24s have caught up with 30—34s (67.3%).
Image
My graph. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. : https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/


Julian F. G. W.

jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2562
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1104 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#457416

Postby jfgw » November 11th, 2021, 8:02 pm

The monthly NHS publication including admissions by age group data was published today. I have plotted these data,
Image
My graph. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. : https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

Data from here, https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/w ... -2021.xlsx

Death rates still rising for 70+ age groups
Image
My graph. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. : https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/


Julian F. G. W.

jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2562
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1104 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#457528

Postby jfgw » November 12th, 2021, 10:30 am

There has been another peak (especially in the South West and in Wales) since I last plotted this but all England regions and Wales rates are now falling.
Image
My graph. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. : https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/


Julian F. G. W.

jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2562
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1104 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: Coronavirus - Numbers and Statistics

#458905

Postby jfgw » November 17th, 2021, 7:46 pm

70+ age group cases are still falling. Lower age groups are now rising again, more so the 5—14 age groups.
Image
My graph. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. : https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/


Julian F. G. W.


Return to “Coronavirus Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests