Lootman wrote:Mike4 wrote:Lootman wrote:Of course, because the vast majority of people have not had the virus.
Only takes say, 0.1%
Very good odds then.
... of spreading the virus!
Thanks to eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva, for Donating to support the site
Lootman wrote:Mike4 wrote:Lootman wrote:Of course, because the vast majority of people have not had the virus.
Only takes say, 0.1%
Very good odds then.
vrdiver wrote:Lootman wrote:Mike4 wrote:Only takes say, 0.1%
Very good odds then.
... of spreading the virus!
Lootman wrote:vrdiver wrote:Lootman wrote:Very good odds then.
... of spreading the virus!
If you think 1 in 1,000 is high odds then we should play poker together.
vrdiver wrote:Lootman wrote:vrdiver wrote:... of spreading the virus!
If you think 1 in 1,000 is high odds then we should play poker together.
You misunderstand. it's not your odds I care about, but those of the virus as it piggybacks on all you travellers.
Care to play poker that way round?
Lootman wrote:vrdiver wrote:Lootman wrote:If you think 1 in 1,000 is high odds then we should play poker together.
You misunderstand. it's not your odds I care about, but those of the virus as it piggybacks on all you travellers.
Care to play poker that way round?
Right now you need a very recent negative test result to fly into the UK.
So if you had a choice of mixing with 1,000 recent air arrivals and 1,000 random people in your neighbourhood, you should choose the former.
Lootman wrote:So if you had a choice of mixing with 1,000 recent air arrivals and 1,000 random people in your neighbourhood, you should choose the former.
Mike4 wrote:Lootman wrote:vrdiver wrote:You misunderstand. it's not your odds I care about, but those of the virus as it piggybacks on all you travellers.
Care to play poker that way round?
Right now you need a very recent negative test result to fly into the UK.
So if you had a choice of mixing with 1,000 recent air arrivals and 1,000 random people in your neighbourhood, you should choose the former.
BBC tonight is reporting tonight a thriving trade in faked negative test result certificates.
Now why would there even be a market for such a thing, other than to incoming infected travellers?
Lootman wrote:...... a valid vaccination certificate should in time become sufficient for travel, and other things.
88V8 wrote:... other things... do you think tarts will be requiring that their customers produce a certificate?
Newroad wrote:Afternoon All.
It's been a while on this one - I hope planning a re-opening counts as a material change.
Australia's Eastern States either have re-opened or are in the process of doing so.
Here is the latest from the West: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-06/wa-covid-19-roadmap-mark-mcgowan-vaccination-plan/100598486
Regards, Newroad
Return to “Coronavirus Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests