Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh,johnstevens77,Bhoddhisatva, for Donating to support the site

Vaccines for under 40s

The home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
Forum rules
This is the home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
redsturgeon
Lemon Half
Posts: 8948
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 3688 times

Vaccines for under 40s

#411946

Postby redsturgeon » May 14th, 2021, 4:40 pm

The government has recommended not giving The AZ vaccine to the under 40s but there is an issue at the moment that most vaccine centres seem to have ample supplies of the AZ vaccine with the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines being less available*. So I wonder what is going to happen when the under 40s turn up for their vaccines to be told that they only have AZ available...will they be given the choice of AZ today or come back when we have Pfizer or Moderna for you?

John

* This was told to me by a two vaccine workers working in different centres.

murraypaul
Lemon Slice
Posts: 785
Joined: April 9th, 2021, 5:54 pm
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 265 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#411959

Postby murraypaul » May 14th, 2021, 5:34 pm

redsturgeon wrote:The government has recommended not giving The AZ vaccine to the under 40s


I don't believe that is correct?
I think that have said that they should be given a choice of vaccines.
That is as much about reducing people's concerns about heath issues, as actual health issues.

murraypaul
Lemon Slice
Posts: 785
Joined: April 9th, 2021, 5:54 pm
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 265 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#411969

Postby murraypaul » May 14th, 2021, 6:27 pm

Halfway between the two:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/jcvi ... d-under-40
the JCVI has advised a preference for adults aged 30 to 39 without underlying health conditions to receive an alternative to the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine – where available and only if this does not cause substantial delays in being vaccinated.

Julian
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1389
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:58 am
Has thanked: 534 times
Been thanked: 677 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#411970

Postby Julian » May 14th, 2021, 6:31 pm

redsturgeon wrote:The government has recommended not giving The AZ vaccine to the under 40s but there is an issue at the moment that most vaccine centres seem to have ample supplies of the AZ vaccine with the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines being less available*. So I wonder what is going to happen when the under 40s turn up for their vaccines to be told that they only have AZ available...will they be given the choice of AZ today or come back when we have Pfizer or Moderna for you?

John

* This was told to me by a two vaccine workers working in different centres.


I wonder when we will see results for the clinical trials on the various AZ/Pfz + AZ/Pfz mixed dosing combos that I think are well underway now. If those results are conclusive & favourable then if there is an AZ surplus it would be quite handy to not have to always give a Pfizer 2nd dose to someone whose 1st dose was Pfizer but instead be able to use an AZ dose. Doubly helpful if the clinical trials actually showed improved efficacy vs a Pfz + Pfz regimen.

- Julian

AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6385
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1882 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#411976

Postby AleisterCrowley » May 14th, 2021, 6:53 pm

If you 'mix your drinks' it makes the side effects worse , apparently!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-57075503

Julian
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 1389
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:58 am
Has thanked: 534 times
Been thanked: 677 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#411981

Postby Julian » May 14th, 2021, 7:28 pm

AleisterCrowley wrote:If you 'mix your drinks' it makes the side effects worse , apparently!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-57075503

Oh. Thank you.

The study, led by the University of Oxford, has recruited 830 volunteers aged over 50.

It is expected to publish its first full results in June.

But preliminary data has now been published in a research letter in the medical journal the Lancet.


Grrrrr. I do wish certain news providers would enter the modern age with all of these new-fangled computer thingies and provide links to cited sources in online news articles. This appears to be the link to the Lancet letter - https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01115-6/fulltext

It looks as if, as per this bit from the Lancet letter, they are only releasing preliminary side effect data at the moment with efficacy to follow in June as mentioned in the BBC article …

Following consultation with the study trial steering committee, here we present the initial reactogenicity and safety data, ahead of the primary immunological outcome, which is projected to be available in June, 2021.


I wonder if the increased incidence of mild systemic side effects might actually be immunologically encouraging if it is because the recipients’ immune systems are being given a bigger kick on the second dose on a mixed regimen maybe resulting in a higher overall immune response. We’ll find out in June I suppose. Even if the info comes too late to inform the timely interventions re the Indian strain it will at least be good to know for the future.

- Julian

AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6385
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1882 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#411987

Postby AleisterCrowley » May 14th, 2021, 7:55 pm

Well, there was a BBC article (no,can't cite the source) that said side effects were not indicator of how well the vaccine has worked.
I felt a bit rough for about 12 hours after my AstraZeneca first jab (onset c 8-10 hours post jab) then really tired for a week
I'd like to think that's because an 'antibody app' was running in the background draining my batteries.. but possibly not.
Would happily have #2 - it was mild, and I have had many worse hangovers

zico
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2145
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:12 pm
Has thanked: 1078 times
Been thanked: 1091 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#412117

Postby zico » May 15th, 2021, 12:12 pm

redsturgeon wrote:The government has recommended not giving The AZ vaccine to the under 40s but there is an issue at the moment that most vaccine centres seem to have ample supplies of the AZ vaccine with the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines being less available*. So I wonder what is going to happen when the under 40s turn up for their vaccines to be told that they only have AZ available...will they be given the choice of AZ today or come back when we have Pfizer or Moderna for you?

John

* This was told to me by a two vaccine workers working in different centres.


This may explain the government's decision to reduce the interval between 1st and 2nd jab from 12 weeks to 8, because most people who've had the first jab already will be having AZ for their second jab.

(There's a more pessimistic explanation, which is that the India variant is expected to circulate across the country, and the government wants to limit the number of deaths amongst the highest-risk age groups)

UncleEbenezer
The full Lemon
Posts: 10783
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:17 pm
Has thanked: 1470 times
Been thanked: 2993 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#412130

Postby UncleEbenezer » May 15th, 2021, 12:46 pm

Had my second jab this morning.

Lots of people on the conveyor belt. Most of them around my age, but some outliers, including those I'd've put at around and probably under 40. Either those underlying health conditions, or they're mixing first and second jabs in a session.

redsturgeon
Lemon Half
Posts: 8948
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 3688 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#412137

Postby redsturgeon » May 15th, 2021, 1:04 pm

UncleEbenezer wrote:Had my second jab this morning.

Lots of people on the conveyor belt. Most of them around my age, but some outliers, including those I'd've put at around and probably under 40. Either those underlying health conditions, or they're mixing first and second jabs in a session.


AZ or other?

John

murraypaul
Lemon Slice
Posts: 785
Joined: April 9th, 2021, 5:54 pm
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 265 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#412141

Postby murraypaul » May 15th, 2021, 1:16 pm

UncleEbenezer wrote:...or they're mixing first and second jabs in a session.


They definitely were when I had my first jab, there were others having their second.

UncleEbenezer
The full Lemon
Posts: 10783
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:17 pm
Has thanked: 1470 times
Been thanked: 2993 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#412147

Postby UncleEbenezer » May 15th, 2021, 1:26 pm

redsturgeon wrote:
UncleEbenezer wrote:Had my second jab this morning.

Lots of people on the conveyor belt. Most of them around my age, but some outliers, including those I'd've put at around and probably under 40. Either those underlying health conditions, or they're mixing first and second jabs in a session.


AZ or other?

John

The Turkish/German/American flavour.

BTW, 'twas when I had the first jab that I posted the straw poll.

murraypaul wrote:They definitely were when I had my first jab, there were others having their second.


Are you going to tell us how long ago that was? Put it in the context of vaccine policy at the time.

For example, whether it was under the no-AZ regime if you're one of those newly-eligible healthy under-40s.

murraypaul
Lemon Slice
Posts: 785
Joined: April 9th, 2021, 5:54 pm
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 265 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#412149

Postby murraypaul » May 15th, 2021, 1:35 pm

UncleEbenezer wrote:Are you going to tell us how long ago that was? Put it in the context of vaccine policy at the time.

For example, whether it was under the no-AZ regime if you're one of those newly-eligible healthy under-40s.


About three weeks ago.
The impression I had was that AZ was the only jab they had.
This was a GP-led centre, rather than a centrally managed NHS one.

Gersemi
Lemon Slice
Posts: 497
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:57 pm
Has thanked: 535 times
Been thanked: 224 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#412259

Postby Gersemi » May 15th, 2021, 7:51 pm

So the latest government wheeze is that they're going to shorten the time between the first & second vaccines for over 50s to 8 weeks. How is that going to work then? I was vaccinated in the 50-54 cohort and my first vaccine was 8 weeks ago. I don't seem to have a message about getting my second vaccination yet . . .

AleisterCrowley
Lemon Half
Posts: 6385
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:35 am
Has thanked: 1882 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#412264

Postby AleisterCrowley » May 15th, 2021, 8:00 pm

Gersemi wrote:So the latest government wheeze is that they're going to shorten the time between the first & second vaccines for over 50s to 8 weeks. How is that going to work then? I was vaccinated in the 50-54 cohort and my first vaccine was 8 weeks ago. I don't seem to have a message about getting my second vaccination yet . . .

No, me neither - 55, vaccinated (AZN) just over 8 weeks ago. GP led , up at Pangbourne

XFool
The full Lemon
Posts: 12636
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
Been thanked: 2608 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#412266

Postby XFool » May 15th, 2021, 8:08 pm

Gersemi wrote:So the latest government wheeze is that they're going to shorten the time between the first & second vaccines for over 50s to 8 weeks.

I heard that too, from the previous "12 weeks". Yet, when I had my second vaccination (AZN - over 70) it was in fact 8 weeks after the first, not twelve weeks.

jfgw
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2562
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1104 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#412331

Postby jfgw » May 15th, 2021, 11:43 pm

I am now due to have my second jab two weeks ago.

Julian F. G. W.

redsturgeon
Lemon Half
Posts: 8948
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 3688 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#412349

Postby redsturgeon » May 16th, 2021, 7:45 am

jfgw wrote:I am now due to have my second jab two weeks ago.

Julian F. G. W.


Are you thinking of doing anything about this?

John

Mike4
Lemon Half
Posts: 7181
Joined: November 24th, 2016, 3:29 am
Has thanked: 1658 times
Been thanked: 3817 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#412406

Postby Mike4 » May 16th, 2021, 11:32 am

Now the under-40s are being invited to be vaccinated a hot new debate has opened up over in "The Combustion Chamber" (forum for gas bods).

Basically someone asked "I had covid six months ago, confirmed by PCR test at the time and subsequently confirmed by antibody test. Why should I have the vaccine, given I now have natural immunity?"

So, should he get vaccinated? And if so, why?

tjh290633
Lemon Half
Posts: 8267
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
Has thanked: 919 times
Been thanked: 4130 times

Re: Vaccines for under 40s

#412409

Postby tjh290633 » May 16th, 2021, 11:36 am

Gersemi wrote:So the latest government wheeze is that they're going to shorten the time between the first & second vaccines for over 50s to 8 weeks. How is that going to work then? I was vaccinated in the 50-54 cohort and my first vaccine was 8 weeks ago. I don't seem to have a message about getting my second vaccination yet . . .

Our Health Centre has said that they have only just received that information, and it will not be immediate, as they need more supplies of vaccine to do it.
Hello everyone.

We wanted to comment on last night's COVID press briefing announcement that the government vaccine committee (the JCVI) is recommending that second dose vaccines for over fifty-year olds is given at eight weeks and not at 10-12 weeks.
It is important to note that we received no advanced warning of this significant change in guidance and are only now able to work out how we can accommodate this change.

In effect we need to generate another two or three weeks’ worth of additional vaccination capacity into our existing programme – this will allow us to vaccinate all those people who have already waited 10 or more weeks to receive their second vaccine as well as to start to bring in everyone else at the 8 week point. This will not be something we will be able to do overnight. Please bear with us.

I hope you feel the that the vaccine programme has gone well so far and as such I hope that you will trust us and allow us time to adapt to the new target times. As such we respectfully ask that you do not contact the surgery to enquire when your vaccination will be. We will get your vaccination done as soon as we can.

Thank you for all of your patience and support.

That says it all.

TJH


Return to “Coronavirus Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests