Donate to Remove ads

Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators

Thanks to jfgw,Rhyd6,eyeball08,Wondergirly,bofh, for Donating to support the site

"Deaths with Covid"

The home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
Forum rules
This is the home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
Clitheroekid
Lemon Quarter
Posts: 2874
Joined: November 6th, 2016, 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 1389 times
Been thanked: 3805 times

"Deaths with Covid"

#433865

Postby Clitheroekid » August 10th, 2021, 11:44 pm

The Guardian had a headline earlier:

Most UK deaths with Covid recorded in day since March

The number of people who died in the UK within 28 days of a positive Covid test, whose death was recorded in the last 24 hours, is at its highest since March.

Official data shows 146 people have been recorded as dying within the past day – the highest since 175 were recorded on 12 March


But it went on to say:

For the week ending 23 July, of 9,100 total deaths over seven days there were 308 fatalities in which Covid was mentioned on the death certificate.

Nobody knows what percentage of the population has had Covid, but in February they were saying that 15% of the population had contracted it - https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-15- ... y-12207328

That's just less than 1 in 6 of the population, and by definition the number must have increased since January. It seems reasonable to assume that it's now at least 20%, or 1 in 5.

So if there were 9,100 deaths in a week, one would have expected at least around 1,800 of them to have tested positive for Covid. In fact, as its concentration is highest in the over 80's, and they are the large majority of the deaths one would have expected the figure to be well over 2,000.

Yet it was only 308. And in that context the latest figure of 146 seems neither here nor there. Even assuming that figure was replicated every day the weekly total would still be well under the 1 in 5 that one would expect from a random selection of people.

It therefore seems to me that the numbers of people dying with Covid, let alone of it, are now so small as to be not worth reporting, let alone reporting with a splashy headline (though admittedly, it was the Guardian!)

In fact, on these figures, it would seem that you're less likely to die if you have got Covid than if you haven't! ;)

Dod101
The full Lemon
Posts: 16629
Joined: October 10th, 2017, 11:33 am
Has thanked: 4343 times
Been thanked: 7536 times

Re: "Deaths with Covid"

#433867

Postby Dod101 » August 10th, 2021, 11:57 pm

I think I agree with you. It is time (as I said a while ago) for these numbers not to be reported any longer as they are pretty meaningless.

Dod

servodude
Lemon Half
Posts: 8411
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
Has thanked: 4486 times
Been thanked: 3619 times

Re: "Deaths with Covid"

#433874

Postby servodude » August 11th, 2021, 12:58 am

Can I agree that "newspapers" need to find something else to talk about.

Reporting the data through the official channels/dashboard is probably still warranted; though the "deaths with 28 days of your first Covid test" is probably well past its sell by data (re-infection rates making it more moot as time goes on)

But....

It's important to pay attention to tenses though lest we fall foul of base rate fallacies
- the 15% of the population mentioned the linked article were mentioned has having had Covid by mid-January (i.e. cumulatively up to that point)
- it's having COVID that's the risk not having had it previously

If you were looking to infer whether a proportion of deaths looked significant you would need to look at the instantaneous prevalence of COVID - which in England is estimated at 1 in 75 presently

So, using the figures provided, if there were 9100 deaths in a week you would expect 121 of them to be COVID deaths if having COVID and dying were completely independent

But yeah, they should find something else to publish; statistics refreshers or grammar perhaps? ;)

- sd

servodude
Lemon Half
Posts: 8411
Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
Has thanked: 4486 times
Been thanked: 3619 times

Re: "Deaths with Covid"

#433883

Postby servodude » August 11th, 2021, 5:12 am

Feckin' Muphrys's Law strikes again ;)
- sd

murraypaul
Lemon Slice
Posts: 785
Joined: April 9th, 2021, 5:54 pm
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 265 times

Re: "Deaths with Covid"

#434062

Postby murraypaul » August 11th, 2021, 1:41 pm

Clitheroekid wrote:So if there were 9,100 deaths in a week, one would have expected at least around 1,800 of them to have tested positive for Covid.


In the last 28 days?
Weekly positive test rate is around ~200k, so ~800k in the last 28 days.
That is around 1.2% of the population.


Return to “Coronavirus Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests