Got a credit card? use our Credit Card & Finance Calculators
Thanks to gpadsa,Steffers0,lansdown,Wasron,jfgw, for Donating to support the site
Darwinian evolution
Forum rules
This is the home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
This is the home for all non-political Coronavirus (Covid-19) discussions on The Lemon Fool
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10846
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:17 pm
- Has thanked: 1476 times
- Been thanked: 3022 times
Darwinian evolution
We (should) know from regular colds more-or-less how infectious bugs spread. Proximity to an infected person, especially the breath. Substantially mitigated but far from entirely de-risked by decent ventilation.
Over the past nine months or so we've had isolation and "social distancing" making it harder for such bugs to propagate. So when a strain is better at dealing with those hurdles, Darwinian natural selection naturally favoured it, and it rapidly became a dominant strain. What could be more natural?
That of course is an untested hypothesis. How would one test it? Would anyone even notice, let alone remark on it, if a more infectious but non-serious strain of common cold had emerged for the same reason? Unlikely, because common colds go "below the radar" for collecting statistics at that kind of level. One doesn't medically test cold sufferers for anything, let alone new strains!
Over the past nine months or so we've had isolation and "social distancing" making it harder for such bugs to propagate. So when a strain is better at dealing with those hurdles, Darwinian natural selection naturally favoured it, and it rapidly became a dominant strain. What could be more natural?
That of course is an untested hypothesis. How would one test it? Would anyone even notice, let alone remark on it, if a more infectious but non-serious strain of common cold had emerged for the same reason? Unlikely, because common colds go "below the radar" for collecting statistics at that kind of level. One doesn't medically test cold sufferers for anything, let alone new strains!
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10846
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:17 pm
- Has thanked: 1476 times
- Been thanked: 3022 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
Darwin part 2: the Vaccines.
We're told the vaccines are unexpectedly much more effective than the ‘flu jab.
Could that be because they’re new, and the coronavirus has not yet adapted to them as flu viruses have? In due course it'll evolve variants that can better-resist the vaccine. The 'flu jab could very well be a guide to a long-term steady-state performance of covid vaccines - until the population itself adapts and the disease becomes just another cold virus.
We're told the vaccines are unexpectedly much more effective than the ‘flu jab.
Could that be because they’re new, and the coronavirus has not yet adapted to them as flu viruses have? In due course it'll evolve variants that can better-resist the vaccine. The 'flu jab could very well be a guide to a long-term steady-state performance of covid vaccines - until the population itself adapts and the disease becomes just another cold virus.
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10846
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:17 pm
- Has thanked: 1476 times
- Been thanked: 3022 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
Darwin Part 3: the Award
Can we offer a Societal Darwin Award for societies that have got the worst of both worlds: both rampant covid and massive disruption to social, cultural and economic life? And that double down on failed policies? There are quite a few contenders!
Can we offer a Societal Darwin Award for societies that have got the worst of both worlds: both rampant covid and massive disruption to social, cultural and economic life? And that double down on failed policies? There are quite a few contenders!
-
- Lemon Quarter
- Posts: 1339
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 123 times
- Been thanked: 848 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
UncleEbenezer wrote:Darwin part 2: the Vaccines.
We're told the vaccines are unexpectedly much more effective than the ‘flu jab.
Could that be because they’re new, and the coronavirus has not yet adapted to them as flu viruses have? In due course it'll evolve variants that can better-resist the vaccine. The 'flu jab could very well be a guide to a long-term steady-state performance of covid vaccines - until the population itself adapts and the disease becomes just another cold virus.
Alternatively it could be the Covid vaccines have been created using new technology, compared to the old technology flu vaccines.
Novavax, who are trialling a new covid vaccine based on the spike protein, have also developed a flu vaccine, using the same technology which seems to be more effective than the standard flu vaccine:
https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/n ... al-phase-3
Disclosure: I have a strong interest in Novavvax, as I am on their covid vaccine clinical trial!
FD
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10846
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:17 pm
- Has thanked: 1476 times
- Been thanked: 3022 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
funduffer wrote:UncleEbenezer wrote:Darwin part 2: the Vaccines.
We're told the vaccines are unexpectedly much more effective than the ‘flu jab.
Could that be because they’re new, and the coronavirus has not yet adapted to them as flu viruses have? In due course it'll evolve variants that can better-resist the vaccine. The 'flu jab could very well be a guide to a long-term steady-state performance of covid vaccines - until the population itself adapts and the disease becomes just another cold virus.
Alternatively it could be the Covid vaccines have been created using new technology, compared to the old technology flu vaccines.
Novavax, who are trialling a new covid vaccine based on the spike protein, have also developed a flu vaccine, using the same technology which seems to be more effective than the standard flu vaccine:
https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/n ... al-phase-3
Disclosure: I have a strong interest in Novavvax, as I am on their covid vaccine clinical trial!
FD
A "new technology" 'flu vaccine would also be novel to the virus it targets. Therefore the same argument would indeed predict that it too be more effective than familiar vaccines. But it won't be novel forever, and the who knows how the virus will react?
-
- Lemon Slice
- Posts: 778
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 7:18 am
- Has thanked: 211 times
- Been thanked: 491 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
We're told the vaccines are unexpectedly much more effective than the ‘flu jab.
Could that be because they’re new, and the coronavirus has not yet adapted to them as flu viruses have? In due course it'll evolve variants that can better-resist the vaccine.
Yes, but influenza works differently from a coronavirus so you can't make a straight comparison.
We need an annual 'flu vaccine because the virus changes rapidly every year. But this isn't a *response* to the vaccine (or mostly not. It could have some effect). It's due just to 'flu biology.
The 'flu virus mutates speedily in any case, and can also infect multiple species. It also has the ability to undergo 're-assortment': where an animal has simultaneous infections of different strains, such as a human and a duck strain co-infecting a pig, genes from the different strains can re-combine in different ways to create a brand new strain, wildly different from previous ones. This is the big source of 'flu pandemic strains. I remember being taught that many 'flu pandemics arise in countries where humans and various domestic animals live in close proximity to each other, making this re-assortment more likely.
Heavyweight academic info here:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5578040/
The 'flu virus lacks a proof-reading function when it replicates its RNA - one reason for its high mutation rate. Animals and plants use proof-reading/error correcting when DNA replicates to reduce the error rate. Coronoaviruses though are a bit unusual in that they do have a proof-reading gene. So Coronaviruses mutate, but it's not in the same league as 'flu. Simply the short generation time, and the untold billions of particles means that there are still plentiful mutations about.
Here's a quote from a paper than explains proof-reading and mutation quite well:
"RNA virus replication typically has a high error rate (or low viral fidelity) that results in the virus existing as diverse populations of genome mutants or ‘‘quasispecies’’ (Denison et al., 2011). While low replicative fidelity allows the RNA viruses to adapt to different replicative environments and selective pressures, it is also associated with an increased chance of error catastrophe leading to viral extinction."
Cribbed from:
https://www.cell.com/molecular-cell/pdf/S1097-2765(20)30518-9.pdf
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6460
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 11:33 pm
- Has thanked: 1569 times
- Been thanked: 980 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
This is an interesting and long article on whether the Covid virus occurred by Darwinian processes or was an escape from a laboratory:
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article ... heory.html
Regards,
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article ... heory.html
Regards,
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6050
- Joined: May 30th, 2021, 6:01 pm
- Has thanked: 1843 times
- Been thanked: 2067 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
not Covid related at all but as the post is caaled Darwinian, this d*ickhead must win a prize
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-58771370
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-58771370
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8170
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 2:30 pm
- Has thanked: 2902 times
- Been thanked: 4001 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
pje16 wrote:not Covid related at all but as the post is caaled Darwinian, this d*ickhead must win a prize
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-58771370
A head case, obviously, but not as unusual as you might think. Known as pica, and quite common in prisons. https://www.menshealth.com/health/a1954 ... -disorder/
Anyway, nobody's going to accuse this guy of having a screw loose. He's got hundreds!
BJ
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6050
- Joined: May 30th, 2021, 6:01 pm
- Has thanked: 1843 times
- Been thanked: 2067 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
must admit I wasn't expecting to find it was a known medical condtion
tempted to call it Pica (mix)
tempted to call it Pica (mix)
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
- Has thanked: 4497 times
- Been thanked: 3627 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
UncleEbenezer wrote:So when a strain is better at dealing with those hurdles, Darwinian natural selection naturally favoured it, and it rapidly became a dominant strain. What could be more natural?
Flip that thinking a bit and I'll agree
Darwinism doesn't favour anything - it works in the other direction, it filters stuff
- it doesn't make things arise or appear; it gets rid of variants
It's a subtle but important difference; not so much for the mechanics thereof but certainly is for understanding stuff
- e.g. social distancing did not cause Alpha/Delta to appear or proliferation, even if it did suppress earlier variants more efficiently
-sd
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8981
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 9:06 am
- Has thanked: 1330 times
- Been thanked: 3711 times
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 5:56 am
- Has thanked: 4497 times
- Been thanked: 3627 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
redsturgeon wrote:Nut bolts washers and screws.
John
I learned it as spectacles, testicles, wallet and watch
- must vary with region
- sd
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8315
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 11:20 am
- Has thanked: 921 times
- Been thanked: 4154 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
servodude wrote:redsturgeon wrote:Nut bolts washers and screws.
John
I learned it as spectacles, testicles, wallet and watch
- must vary with region
- sd
Two different origins, I think. The first is about the lunatic who raped washerwomen then ran away (Nut screws washers bolts).
The second is about a Rabbi crossing himself and was "Teeth, testicles, wallet, watch".
But I digress.
TJH
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 10846
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 8:17 pm
- Has thanked: 1476 times
- Been thanked: 3022 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
bungeejumper wrote:A head case, obviously,
BJ
A nutcase, one might say? Bit screwed up.
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 8170
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 2:30 pm
- Has thanked: 2902 times
- Been thanked: 4001 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
Stompa wrote:An MRI would have sorted him out.....
LOL, wouldn't it just? They ask you whether you've got body piercings or deeply lodged bullets before they put you into the big magnetic machine, but I don't remember being quizzed about a whole Meccano set.
BJ
-
- The full Lemon
- Posts: 12636
- Joined: November 8th, 2016, 7:21 pm
- Been thanked: 2609 times
Re: Darwinian evolution
pje16 wrote:not Covid related at all but as the post is caaled Darwinian, this d*ickhead must win a prize
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-58771370
Perhaps he's evolving into a robot?
-
- Lemon Half
- Posts: 6050
- Joined: May 30th, 2021, 6:01 pm
- Has thanked: 1843 times
- Been thanked: 2067 times
Return to “Coronavirus Discussions”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests