TUK020 wrote:joey wrote:If SMT ever invest in a perpetual motion machine or cold fusion then I’ll consider it to be a “sell” signal
Or a major stake in bitcoin?
RICA?
Thanks to gpadsa,Steffers0,lansdown,Wasron,jfgw, for Donating to support the site
TUK020 wrote:joey wrote:If SMT ever invest in a perpetual motion machine or cold fusion then I’ll consider it to be a “sell” signal
Or a major stake in bitcoin?
ReallyVeryFoolish wrote:SoBo65 wrote:I see both AsleepInYorkshire and ReallyVeryFoolish are quoted in the times today:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/save ... 184454_101
This cannot be true "On The Lemon Fool bulletin board retail investors, 300,000 of whom put their money with Woodford,"?
RVF
ReallyVeryFoolish wrote:This cannot be true "On The Lemon Fool bulletin board retail investors, 300,000 of whom put their money with Woodford,"?
Alaric wrote:ReallyVeryFoolish wrote:This cannot be true "On The Lemon Fool bulletin board retail investors, 300,000 of whom put their money with Woodford,"?
I presume they were trying to say that there were 300,000 retail investors in Woodford funds, some of whom commented on The Lemon Fool.
SoBo65 wrote:I see both AsleepInYorkshire and ReallyVeryFoolish are quoted in the times today:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/save ... 184454_101
The Times wrote:On The Lemon Fool bulletin board retail investors, 300,000 of whom put their money with Woodford,
The Times wrote:On The Lemon Fool bulletin board retail investors, 300,000 of whom put their money with Woodford, said that he “should not be allowed near the investment area again”. One, calling themselves ReallyVeryFoolish, said: “I am annoyed that this charlatan isn’t being locked up. He made millions. Only the little guys lost money. Woodford coming back into the game is appalling.” A posting by AsleepInYorkshire, said: “He hasn’t got any sympathy for those he persuaded to invest with him. He betrayed trust.”
yorkshirelad1 wrote:SoBo65 wrote:I see both AsleepInYorkshire and ReallyVeryFoolish are quoted in the times today:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/save ... 184454_101
To me, that just smacks of lazy journalism: copy/paste something off the web/forum, and the misunderstanding inherent in the Times text says it allThe Times wrote:On The Lemon Fool bulletin board retail investors, 300,000 of whom put their money with Woodford,
For the full quote of where the Times quotes TLF, for those that don't have access through the paywall (register for one free article a day etc):The Times wrote:On The Lemon Fool bulletin board retail investors, 300,000 of whom put their money with Woodford, said that he “should not be allowed near the investment area again”. One, calling themselves ReallyVeryFoolish, said: “I am annoyed that this charlatan isn’t being locked up. He made millions. Only the little guys lost money. Woodford coming back into the game is appalling.” A posting by AsleepInYorkshire, said: “He hasn’t got any sympathy for those he persuaded to invest with him. He betrayed trust.”
(If the Times can quote TLF, then TLF can quote the Times....)
richfool wrote:Yes, what happened to copyright? I'm surprised that the Times is freely accessing and quoting material from TLF, yet I am expected to pay to access articles in the Times.
1) If it is used for the purposes of criticism, review or quotation;
2) Where it is utilised for the purposes of reporting current events (this does not apply to photographs)
richfool wrote:So, AiY and RVF having been quoted by the Times, will no longer be able to use the expression, - "IMHO", - "In My Humble Opinion".
Henceforth, they will have to use the expression: "IMEO", - i.e. "In My Esteemed Opinion"!!
Return to “Investment Trusts and Unit Trusts”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests