GrahamPlatt wrote:I do not see refusing vaccination as a “human right”. You owe a duty of care to others. You want to live in society, then be sociable and get with the program.
So what do you say to the relatives of those who after taking the vax are now dead?
The most prominent being the BBC Radio Newcastle presenter who did so and died a week later.
Now obviously she took it voluntarily - and made the wrong decision, given that at her age of 44 she was unlikely to have suffered severely from covid had she even got it. Now consider what the situation would be if she had been forced to take it. She would still be dead - and someone would be on the end of a mega court case.
Given that there are always going to be a certain number of vax fatalities your suggesting of 100% mandatory vax rule, amounts to government sanctioned execution of those unfortunate to have a genetic makeup that makes them vax sensitive.
Are they all to be written off as collateral damage and we don't care?
Currently deaths following the vax are standing at 406 for Pfzier, 863 for AZ, and 4 for Moderna. not of course that the gov would accept that any of these deaths (which include the blood clot ones HMG spent so much time denying) have anything do do with the vax and are all totally co-incidental. Just like they tried for 10 years to deny that the narcolepsy sufferers has anything to do with the swine flu vax.
And the number of fit healthy people under the age of 60 with no underlying health conditions who have died of the actual virus? Well the only figure seemingly available is that at the end of December 2020 when it stood at a grand total of 388.