mc2fool wrote:absolutezero wrote:Rather a condescending post, don't you think?
Anyone who starts with 'um, ok' and has liberal use of sarky emojis is not trying to be helpful...
My apologies if it came across as such, it wasn't intended to, and the use of 'um, ok' and the confused emojis were meant to reflect my confusion at what seemed to be inconsistencies in your post that I was replying to.
The rest of the happy, smile and wink emojis were meant in a genuine and warm way, as were the I thought constructive hints in that paragraph, and not meant to be sarcastic or condescending at all. Sorry it it all came across otherwise.
Alright. I was probably being a bit over sensitive.
Tone in the mind of the reader after all.
Your comments, though, are food for thought and perhaps I could have expressed my compartmentalised portfolio in my original post.
What are your thoughts on decent ITs to buy?