Bouleversee wrote:Itsallaguess wrote:Bouleversee wrote:
I hope to goodness UK prices do recover as the huge profits I was making on some of my holdings have in most cases all but disappeared, inc. SMT which had shot up in the short time I had held it, Persimmon, Greggs, Next , Victoria, James Fisher, WH Smith, etc. Needless to say, the big losers are still big losers.
I have rather lost confidence in buying anything so have a fair amount of uninvested cash.
I do really mean well B, when I say that having followed your investment-related posts with interest for many years on these boards, I can't think of anyone else at all that would be more suited to
collective investments like Investment Trusts, rather than continuing to pursue the rotten luck you often seem to have with your single-share holdings, and I'd recommend perhaps making 2022 the year that you look at those collective-investment options a lot more seriously...
Cheers,
Itsallaguess
That's what I decided to do last year and bought SMT which rapidly shot up, so I topped up and it continued to rise, plus another one from the same group whose name escapes me a.t.m., and I had Patient Capital Trust, which has proved to be a disaster. I am usually quite good at picking shares to buy; where I fall down, unlike Dodd and TJH and others, is not selling the damn things when they have shot up. Persimmon, for example, had made me a lot of profit and had it not been for events, dear boy, I daresay would have continued to do so. How could I know that Covid would arrive and Putin would declare war and energy prices would rocket? Or that James Fisher, after doing so well for so many years, would go into dramatic reverse? However, I think many of those long term holdings will eventually recover and it's the ones I picked up from these boards which are unlikely to do so. I do have a few other trusts which I have held for some time which have not done any better than my own picks over all and if you look at Citywire's performance table for trusts last year, most of them were unremarkable. It's not long since everyone was piling into Chinese shares and trusts but I'm not sorry I didn't do that. And I can't forget that I had 2 complete wipe outs with trusts or funds many years ago.
My other problem is lack of time and energy to keep up with events and the stupidly large number of holdings I have but I do think luck plays a big part these days, not to mention algorithms and shorters and even with my do little approach, I have more than enough to see me out so I'll just keep my fingers crossed and try to cash in a proportion of any dramatic gains I get in the future. I did use to sell half in years gone by when I had fewer to keep an eye on and a much smaller garden. My Clarkson's are doing well at the moment so I'll keep an eye on them, The housing market will take rather longer, I fear. I just wish companies like Arm, which did very well for me, wouldn't get sold to foreigners. It doesn't thrill me that China has large stakes in so many of our companies. I have never forgotten my father telling me, as a small child, that China would rule the world one day.
Happy New Year to all.
Bouleversee
There is always eggs and baskets to consider; perhaps spreads your IT investments around by geography/sectors , so if you say have SMT re Tec also maybe have one or two North American facing trusts , maybe an Indian focused trust (I do not have) , a Chinese one perhaps, an Asian one, maybe a couple UK FTSE facing or a European Trust etc.
Also maybe try market sector niches (mining/property/renewables etc)
Whilst I do play around with my share individual holdings (currently Bellway, BHP,BAT,HSBC,Imp, L&G,Shell,Smith DS, Springfield, Unilever) I do tend to mainly leave my ITs alone:(Except Polar and a couple of others which displeased me in times past and got heaved)
Ab Asian
BRock Sustain Am Inc
Berkshire (I view as an IT though it is not)
BRock Wrld Mine
Edin Invest
European assets
Fidelity Spec Sit
Hend Far East
Hipgnosis
JPM G&I
Middlefield Canada
Murray Int
North Am IT
Schroeder Oriental
Scottish Mortgage
Vina Capital
Not all ITs are same size re sum invested, the big funds that are broad like Murray get more money (3x) than say Vina(1x) that is more single country targeted (Vietnam), Re ITs I sort of work on three sizes of holdings (3x,2x,1x), most are 2x
I tend to pick up individual shares with odd available funds so these can be anything, so say Shell/Unilever 5 times the size of Springfield, 2.5 times the size Bellway, bigger beasts get more money (though I have been cautious with B Tob and Imp(sector risks) and L &G and HSBC are half Shell/Unilever (because I cannot understand financial sector accounts so am a tad cautious)
I tend to have maybe more Asia/North America facing than most would but that is just my view on longer term world economics (I do not see great UK/Europe growth over next 10-15 years and whilst I might buy something African and something South American these will be smaller investments)
The mix is skewed, 75% of portfolio value is currently in ITs (as I define) and 25% in individual shares.
If you ignore the individual shares (and I probably ought) you can spray the funds around the world in targeted ITs and then sit back and pretty much forget.