Lootman wrote:
Let's assume that Peru took the least precautions.
Let's not.
Clearly facts do not matter to you.
Thanks to bruncher,niord,gvonge,Shelford,GrahamPlatt, for Donating to support the site
Lootman wrote:
Let's assume that Peru took the least precautions.
9873210 wrote:Lootman wrote:Let's assume that Peru took the least precautions.
Let's not. Clearly facts do not matter to you.
Lootman wrote:9873210 wrote:Let's not. Clearly facts do not matter to you.
And what other reason do you have? You gave no "facts" either.
But if your point is that at least some of those "precautions" might have been ineffective, then I might agree.
9873210 wrote:Lootman wrote:And what other reason do you have? You gave no "facts" either.
But if your point is that at least some of those "precautions" might have been ineffective, then I might agree.
My point is that you are just making things up. Not only are you making things up but you are now defending making things up. Further proof that you do not care about facts.
Lootman wrote:9873210 wrote:My point is that you are just making things up. Not only are you making things up but you are now defending making things up. Further proof that you do not care about facts.
I offered more facts than you did. If you want a debate then offer evidence rather than just cheap mindless gainsaying and personal attacks.
9873210 wrote:Lootman wrote:I offered more facts than you did. If you want a debate then offer evidence rather than just cheap mindless gainsaying and personal attacks.
More evidence that you do not care about facts. Pointing out logical flaws is neither mindless gainsaying nor a personal attack. If it seems like a personal attack it is because you are too attached to flawed logic.
XFool wrote:Or indeed, almost anything?
Steveam wrote:From the BBC:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-65204169
Best wishes, Steve
MrFoolish wrote:I'd like to ask what happened to the regular booster jabs?
A year or so back, everyone was told of the vital importance of boosters and people were queuing down the street for them. Now, apart from the highly vulnerable, they don't seem to be important at all.
So what changed?
MrFoolish wrote:I'd like to ask what happened to the regular booster jabs?
A year or so back, everyone was told of the vital importance of boosters and people were queuing down the street for them. Now, apart from the highly vulnerable, they don't seem to be important at all.
So what changed?
Ashfordian wrote:MrFoolish wrote:I'd like to ask what happened to the regular booster jabs?
A year or so back, everyone was told of the vital importance of boosters and people were queuing down the street for them. Now, apart from the highly vulnerable, they don't seem to be important at all.
So what changed?
Lots of reasons, not limited to:
- Covid was never a risk to fit and healthy under 50's, bar a couple of outlier cases
- The vast majority have had the virus so it is no longer a novel virus
- The spike protein of the virus has mutated many times away from the spike protein given in the vaccine
- Giving out unneeded vaccines does more harm than good to overall vaccine uptake
- Can the cost and disruption on the health system justify having healthy people queuing down the street to have a time limiting vaccine against a virus that does not affect them?
servodude wrote:Ashfordian wrote:
Lots of reasons, not limited to:
- Covid was never a risk to fit and healthy under 50's, bar a couple of outlier cases
- The vast majority have had the virus so it is no longer a novel virus
- The spike protein of the virus has mutated many times away from the spike protein given in the vaccine
- Giving out unneeded vaccines does more harm than good to overall vaccine uptake
- Can the cost and disruption on the health system justify having healthy people queuing down the street to have a time limiting vaccine against a virus that does not affect them?
That's mostly true but you've not defined "outlier".
As a novel virus it was batting in the order of "something nasty" even in the under 50 cohort
Now it's not novel I think you're right in that the economic balance has shifted; the cost of advertising and administering vaccines no longer offset by the impact
Return to “Coronavirus Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests